journal article·2024-03-25Open access

Learning-Based Proof of the State-of-the-Art Geometric Hypothesis on Depth-of-Field Scaling and Shifting Influence on Image Sharpness

Siamak Khatibi, Wei Wen, Sayyed Mohammad Emam

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 7

Abstract

Today, we capture and store images in a way that has never been possible. However, huge numbers of degraded and blurred images are captured unintentionally or by mistake. In this paper, we propose a geometrical hypothesis stating that blurring occurs by shifting or scaling the depth of field (DOF). The validity of the hypothesis is proved by an independent method based on depth estimation from a single image. The image depth is modeled regarding its edges to extract amplitude comparison ratios between the generated blurred images and the sharp/blurred images. Blurred images are generated by a stepwise variation in the standard deviation of the Gaussian filter estimate in the improved model. This process acts as virtual image recording used to mimic the recording of several image instances. A historical documentation database is used to validate the hypothesis and classify sharp images from blurred ones and different blur types. The experimental results show that distinguishing unintentionally blurred images from non-blurred ones by a comparison of their depth of field is applicable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Image Processing Techniques and Applications · Advanced Image Processing Techniques · Advanced Vision and Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Technology and Aesthetics, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 371 79 Karlskrona, Sweden

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ardakan University, Ardakan P.O. Box 184, Iran

Funding

Knowledge Foundation

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Blur classification using ridgelet transform and feed forward neural network10.5815/ijigsp.2014.09.06 ↗
2. Su, B., Lu, S., and Tan, C.L. (December, January 28). Blurred image region detection and classification. Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
3. Liu, R., Li, Z., and Jia, J. (2008, January 23–28). Image partial blur detection and classification. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Anchorage, AK, USA.
4. Marziliano, P., Dufaux, F., Winkler, S., and Ebrahimi, T. (2002, January 22–25). A no-reference perceptual blur metric. Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Rochester, NY, USA.
5. Chung, Y.C., Wang, J.M., Bailey, R.R., Chen, S.W., and Chang, S.L. (2004, January 1–3). A non-parametric blur measure based on edge analysis for image processing applications. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, Singapore.
6. Defocus Blur detection via transformer encoder and edge guidance10.1007/s10489-022-03303-y ↗
7. Improving defocus blur detection via adaptive supervision prior-tokens10.1016/j.imavis.2023.104842 ↗
8. Almustofa, A.N., Nugraha, Y., Sulasikin, A., Bhaswara, I.D., and Kanggrawan, J.I. (2022, January 2–3). Exploration of image blur detection methods on globally blur images. Proceedings of the 2022 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), Bandung, Indonesia.10.1109/ICoICT55009.2022.9914850 ↗
9. Single image blind deblurring based on salient edge-structures and elastic-net regularization10.1007/s10851-020-00949-6 ↗
10. Single image motion deblurring with reduced ringing effects using variational Bayesian estimation10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.02.015 ↗
11. Zeng, T., and Diao, C. (2020, January 23–25). Single Image Motion Deblurring Based on Modified DenseNet. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data and Business Intelligence, Taiyuan, China.10.1109/MLBDBI51377.2020.00109 ↗
12. Defocus map estimation from a single image via spectrum contrast10.1364/OL.38.001706 ↗
13. A unified optimization perspective to single/multi-observation blur-kernel estimation with applications to camera-shake deblurring and nonparametric blind super-resolution10.1007/s10851-015-0598-4 ↗
14. Purohit, K., Shah, A.B., and Rajagopalan, A.N. (2018, January 7–10). Learning based single image blur detection and segmentation. Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Athens, Greece.10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451765 ↗
15. Focus area extraction by blind deconvolution for defining regions of interest10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1079 ↗
16. Region-of-interest extraction in low depth of field images using ensemble clustering and difference of Gaussian approaches10.1016/j.patcog.2013.03.006 ↗
17. Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J., and Wang, J.Z. (2006, January 7–13). Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Graz, Austria.10.1007/11744078_23 ↗
18. Joint learning of motion deblurring and defocus deblurring networks with a real-world dataset10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126996 ↗
19. Depth perception in single camera system using focus blur and aperture number
20. Nazir, S., Vaquero, L., Mucientes, M., Brea, V.M., and Coltuc, D. (2023). Depth estimation and image restoration by deep learning from defocused images. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging. arXiv.10.1109/TCI.2023.3288335 ↗
21. Depth map estimation using defocus and motion cues10.1109/TCSVT.2018.2832086 ↗
22. Deblur and deep depth from single defocus image10.1007/s00138-020-01162-6 ↗
23. Hecht, E. (2001). Optics, Addison Wesley. [4th ed.].
24. Blanchet, G., Moisan, L., and Rougé, B. (2008, January 12–15). Measuring the global phase coherence of an image. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/ICIP.2008.4711970 ↗
25. Digital photography with flash and no-flash image pairs10.1145/1015706.1015777 ↗
26. A closed-form solution to natural image matting10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1177 ↗
27. RUSBoost: A hybrid approach to alleviating class imbalance10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2029559 ↗
28. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R.E. (1996, January 3–6). Schapire R: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bari, Italy.
29. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods