journal article·2024-03-21Open access

Proactive Braking Control System for Collision Avoidance during Right Turns with Occluded Vision at an Intersection

Sota Aoki, Yohei Fujinami, Pongsathorn Raksincharoensak, Roman Henze

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

This paper describes the development of an Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) which will allow drivers to avoid collisions with an oncoming vehicle from an occluded area when turning right at intersections in left-hand traffic. Connected vehicles, in coordination with infrastructure, represent one of the commercialized ADAS technologies for collision avoidance. However, the coverage of the ADAS will be limited to designated intersections only, as communication equipment needs to be installed in both the vehicle and infrastructure to enable the assistance. This paper proposes an ADAS using on-board sensors, independent of infrastructure facilities, to control the vehicle velocity to avoid collisions. Most current intersection assistance, by using an Autonomous Emergency Braking System (AEBS), allows the driver to avoid a collision with oncoming vehicles when there is clear vision without occlusion. However, many accidents occur when the vehicle detects the oncoming vehicle too late because of occlusion in the intersection, such as a vehicle in the opposite lane. This system calculates the hazardous speed criteria of the ego vehicle, which might result in a high risk of collision when darting out occurs, and provides speed control assistance to allow the driver to escape from the hazardous speed region. The simulation results reveal that the proposed system effectively reduces the possibility of collisions compared to conventional AEBS.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Naka-cho, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan

Institute of Automotive Engineering, Technical University of Braunschweig, Hans-Sommer Strasse 4, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany

Funding

JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C) · Promotion of Joint International Research

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. National Police Agency Traffic Bureau (2023). Status of Traffic Fatal Accident Occurrence and Status of Violation Control of Road Traffic Act in 2022.10.1093/law/9780198902195.003.0010 ↗
2. Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis (ITARDA) (2012). Right turn traffic accidents in signalized Intersection. ITARDA Inf., 95, 4.
3. Opportunities and Limitations for Intersection Collision Intervention—A Study of Real World, Left Turn Across Path, Accidents10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.011 ↗
4. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes10.1080/15389588.2019.1602728 ↗
5. A multilevel collision mitigation approach -its situation assessment, decision making, and performance tradeoffs10.1109/TITS.2006.883115 ↗
6. Model-based threat assessment for avoiding arbitrary vehicle collisions10.1109/TITS.2010.2048314 ↗
7. A Real-time Implementation of an Intersection Collision Avoidance System
8. Nobukawa, K., Gordon, T.J., Barnes, M.A., and Goodsell, R.J. (July, January 29). A comprehensive speed control model for human drivers with application to intersection left turns. Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/ACC.2011.5991415 ↗
9. A probabilistic framework for decision-making in collision avoidance systems10.1109/TITS.2012.2227474 ↗
10. Yoshihira, M., Watanabe, S., Nishira, H., and Kishi, N. (2016). Developing an Autonomous Vehicle Control System for Intersections Using Obstacle/Blind Spot Detection Frames. SAE Tech. Pap.10.4271/2016-01-0143 ↗
11. Optimal motion control for collision avoidance at Left Turn Across Path/Opposite Direction intersection scenarios using electric propulsion10.1080/00423114.2018.1478107 ↗
12. Fors, V., Olofsson, B., and Nielsen, L. (2019, January 23–27). Yaw-Moment Control At-the-Limit of Friction Using Individual Front-Wheel Steering and Four-Wheel Braking. Proceedings of the 9th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Automotive Control, Orléans, France.10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.09.073 ↗
13. Pierowicz, J.A. (2024, February 08). Intersection Collision Avoidance Using ITS Countermeasures. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015075257181.
14. Misener, J.A. (2010). Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance System (CICAS): Signalized Left Turn Assist and Traffic Signal Adaptation, University of California. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=919887.
15. Cooperative collision avoidance at intersections: Algorithms and experiments10.1109/TITS.2013.2252901 ↗
16. Effect Evaluation of Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative Right-Turn Collision Prevention System
17. Hirose, T., Ohtsuka, Y., and Gokan, M. (2017). Activation Timing of a Collision Avoidance System with V2V Communication, SAE. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0039.10.4271/2017-01-0039 ↗
18. Accident analysis on intersection right turning by using driving simulator10.1504/IJVS.2014.058239 ↗
19. Quantifying drivers’ comfort-zone and dread-zone boundaries in left turn across path/opposite direction (LTAP/OD) scenarios10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.003 ↗
20. Wang, X., Zhao, D., Peng, H., and LeBlanc, D.J. (2017, January 11–14). Analysis of unprotected intersection left-turn conflicts based on naturalistic driving data. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/IVS.2017.7995723 ↗
21. Left turn crash risk analysis: Development of a microsimulation modeling approach10.1016/j.aap.2020.105591 ↗
22. Kusakari, Y., Oikawa, S., Matsui, Y., and Kubota, N. (2021, January 17–20). Effect of Human–Machine Interface of a Vehicle on Right-Turn Maneuver at Intersections using a Driving Simulator. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/SMC52423.2021.9659015 ↗
23. Using SHRP2 NDS data to examine infrastructure and other factors contributing to older driver crashes during left turns at signalized intersections10.1016/j.aap.2021.106141 ↗
24. Risk Predictive Driver Assistance System for Collision Avoidance in Intersection Right Turns10.20965/jrm.2018.p0015 ↗
25. Fujinami, Y., Raksincharoensak, P., Arita, S., and Kato, R. (2021). Experimental Validation on Intersection Turning Trajectory Prediction Method for Advanced Driver Assistance System Based on Triclothoidal Curves. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11135900 ↗
26. The problem of the amber signal light in traffic flow10.1287/opre.8.1.112 ↗
27. Analysis of traffic conflicts and collisions
28. Perri, G., and Vaiana, R. (2022). Road Safety Management of Uncontrolled Access Points: Design Criteria and Insights into Risk Factors. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122412661 ↗
29. Earliest Sensor Detection Opportunity for Left Turn across Path Opposite Direction Crashes10.1109/TIV.2017.2708611 ↗
30. Saito, Y., Raksincharoensak, P., Inoue, H., EI-Haji, M., and Freudenmann, T. (2018, January 16–20). Context-Sensitive Hazard Anticipation Based on Driver Behavior Analysis and Cause-and-Effect Chain Study. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control (AVEC’18), Beijing, China.
31. Thal, S., Wallis, P., Henze, R., Hasegawa, R., Teranishi, S., Nakamura, H., Kitajima, S., and Abe, G. (2023, January 8–11). Comparison of German and Japanese Urban Intersection Data for Internationally Harmonized Test Procedures. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Future Active Safety Technology towards zero-traffic-accidents (FAST-zero’23), Kanazawa, Japan.