Feature Optimization-Based Machine Learning Approach for Czech Land Cover Classification Using Sentinel-2 Images
Source abstract
Abstract
The Czech Republic is one of the countries along the Belt and Road Initiative, and classifying land cover in the Czech Republic helps to understand the distribution of its forest resources, laying the foundation for forestry cooperation between China and the Czech Republic. This study aims to develop a practical approach for land cover classification in the Czech Republic, with the goal of efficiently acquiring spatial distribution information regarding its forest resources. This approach is based on multi-level feature extraction and selection, integrated with advanced machine learning or deep learning models. To accomplish this goal, the study concentrated on two typical experimental regions in the Czech Republic and conducted a series of classification experiments, using Sentinel-2 and DEM data in 2018 as the main data sources. Initially, this study extracted various features, including spectral, vegetation, and terrain features, from the study area, then assessed and selected key features based on their importance. Additionally, this study also explored multi-level spatial contextual features to improve classification performance. The extracted features include texture and morphological features, as well as deep semantic information learned by utilizing a deep learning model, 3D CNN. Finally, an AdaBoost ensemble learning model with the random forest as the base classifier is designed to produce land cover classification maps, thus obtaining the spatial distribution of forest resources. The experimental results demonstrate that feature optimization significantly enhances the extraction of high-quality features of surface objects, thereby improving classification performance. Specifically, morphological and texture features can effectively enhance the discriminability between different features of surface objects, thereby improving classification accuracy. Utilizing deep learning networks enables more efficient extraction of deep feature information, further enhancing classification accuracy. Moreover, employing an ensemble learning model effectively boosts the accuracy of the original classification results from different individual classifiers. Ultimately, the classification accuracy of the two experimental areas reaches 92.84% and 93.83%, respectively. The user accuracies for forests are 92.24% and 93.14%, while the producer accuracies are 97.71% and 97.02%. This study applies the proposed approach for nationwide classification in the Czech Republic, resulting in an overall classification accuracy of 90.98%, with forest user accuracy at 91.97% and producer accuracy at 96.2%. The results in this study demonstrate the feasibility of combining feature optimization with the 3D Convolutional Neural Network (3DCNN) model for land cover classification. This study can serve as a reference for research methods in deep learning for land cover classification, utilizing optimized features.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote Sensing in Agriculture · Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Remote Sensing and Land Use
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Engineering Research Center for Forestry-Oriented Intelligent Information Processing of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100083, China
School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
Funding
National Key R&D Program of China · Emergency Open Competition Project of National Forestry and Grassland Administration · Outstanding Youth Team Project of Central Universities
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Review and Prospect of China-CEEC Forestry Cooperation
2. Wang, Y., Chen, J., and Gu, Y. (2017). Forestry Development in Central and Eastern European Countries and Analysis on Future 16+1 Forestry Cooperation. For. Resour. Wanagement, 153–159.
3. Forest Cover Change Detection based on GF-1 PMS Data
4. Dynamic Analysis on Vegetation Coverage Changes of Minqin Oasis Based on GF-1 Remote Sensing Image from 2013 to 2015
5. Research Progress of Remote Sensing Classification and Change Monitoring on Forest Types
6. The significance of border training patterns in classification by a feedforward neural network using back propagation learning10.1080/014311699211192 ↗
7. Comparison on Forest Type Classification Methods Based on TM Images
8. Integrating Sentinel Active and Passive Remote Sensing Data to Land Cover Classification in a National Park from GEE Platform
9. Spatial Resolution Image: Pixel Versus Object Classification Comparison
10. An improved land cover classification method using multiple features and a support vector machine
11. Processing and assessment of spectrometric, stereoscopic imagery collected using a lightweight UAV spectral camera for precision agriculture
12. Object based image analysis for remote sensing10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004 ↗
13. Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources10.1109/MGRS.2017.2762307 ↗
14. Advanced Spectral Classifiers for Hyperspectral Images: A Review10.1109/MGRS.2016.2616418 ↗
15. He, M., Li, B., and Chen, H. (2017, January 17–20). Multi-scale 3D deep convolutional neural network for hyperspectral image classification. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICIP.2017.8297014 ↗
16. Spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral image using three-dimensional convolution network
17. Multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion using a 3-D-convolutional neural network10.1109/LGRS.2017.2668299 ↗
18. Unsupervised spatial–spectral feature learning by 3D convolutional autoencoder for hyperspectral classification10.1109/TGRS.2019.2908756 ↗
19. Hyperspectral imagery classification based on semi-supervised 3-D deep neural network and adaptive band selection10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.006 ↗
20. HybridSN: Exploring 3-D–2-D CNN feature hierarchy for hyperspectral image classification10.1109/LGRS.2019.2918719 ↗
21. Deep learning classifiers for hyperspectral imaging: A review10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.09.006 ↗
22. Random forest ensembles and extended multi-extinction profiles for hyperspectral image classification10.1109/TGRS.2017.2744662 ↗
23. Deep Learning Ensemble for Hyperspectral Image Classification10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2915259 ↗
24. Classification and boosting with multiple collaborative representations10.1109/TPAMI.2013.236 ↗
25. Global land cover mapping at 30m resolution: A POK-based operational approach10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.09.002 ↗
26. GLC_FCS30: Global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30m using time-series Landsat imagery10.5194/essd-13-2753-2021 ↗
27. Mapping pan-European land cover using Landsat spectral-temporal metrics and the European LUCAS survey10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.001 ↗
28. Venter, Z.S., and Sydenham, M.A. (2021). Continental-scale land cover mapping at 10 m resolution over Europe (ELC10). Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13122301 ↗
29. Forest coverage monitoring in the Natural Forest Protection Project area of China
30. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0 ↗
31. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X ↗
32. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features10.1080/01431169608948714 ↗
33. Using thematic mapper data to identify contrasting soil plains and tillage practices
34. Rikimaru, A. (August, January 30). Landsat TM data processing guide for forest canopy density mapping and monitoring model. Proceedings of the ITTO Workshop on Utilization of Remote Sensing in Site Assessment and Planning for Rehabilitation of Logged-Over Forest, Bangkok, Thailand.
35. Image recognition analysis and mapping of urban land based on NDBI index method
36. Textural features for image classification10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 ↗
37. Li, X., Chen, W., Cheng, X., and Wang, L. (2016). A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Mapping of Complex Surface-Mined and Agricultural Landscapes Using ZiYuan-3 Stereo Satellite Imagery. Remote Sens., 8.10.3390/rs8060514 ↗
38. On the Importance of Training Data Sample Selection in Random Forest Image Classification: A Case Study in Peatland Ecosystem Mapping10.3390/rs70708489 ↗
39. Modification of the random forest algorithm to avoid statistical dependence problems when classifying remote sensing imagery10.1016/j.cageo.2017.02.012 ↗
40. Maxwell, A.E., Strager, M.P., Warner, T.A., Ramezan, C.A., Morgan, A.N., and Pauley, C.E. (2019). Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11121409 ↗
41. Kelley, L.C., Pitcher, L., and Bacon, C. (2018). Using Google Earth Engine to Map Complex Shade-Grown Coffee Landscapes in Northern Nicaragua. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10060952 ↗
42. A 30-m landsat-derived cropland extent product of Australia and China using random forest machine learning algorithm on Google Earth Engine cloud computing platform10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.07.017 ↗