journal article·2024-03-12Open access

Triple Time Interval Hybridization Strategy for Rapidly Calculating Regional Target–Visible Time Window of Earth Observation Payloads on Space Station

Yadong Shan, Changshuai Du, Yue Li, Zhipeng Li, Xin Jin, Hanxun Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

Earth observation payloads deployed outside the space station play a pivotal role in remote sensing and atmospheric monitoring. Calculating the visible time window (VTW) for regional targets is a fundamental aspect of payload observation and operational mission planning. Aiming to address the challenge of rapidly calculating the VTW for regional targets, this paper introduces the Triple Time Interval Hybridization Strategy (TTIHS). By integrating orbit filtering, large-step angle calculation, and a short interval binary search, the TTIHS adapts different strategies within global, coarse search, and precise search time intervals, effectively reducing computational workload and improving speed. Simultaneously, optimization analysis is conducted on the time step in the coarse search, achieving a balance between computation speed and accuracy. Simulation results, based on real data from the China Space Station, highlight a significant improvement in computational speed while ensuring accuracy. Specifically, the proposed rapid algorithm exhibits a 2.73-fold enhancement in speed compared to the existing rapid algorithm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Satellite Communication Systems · Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry · Infrared Target Detection Methodologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. The China Space Station: A new opportunity for space science10.1093/nsr/nwab219 ↗
2. The benefits of very low earth orbit for earth observation missions10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100619 ↗
3. Reward factor-based multiple agile satellites scheduling with energy and memory constraints10.1109/TAES.2022.3146115 ↗
4. Mission planning problem for optical video satellite imaging with variable image duration: A greedy algorithm based on heuristic knowledge10.1016/j.asr.2020.09.002 ↗
5. Chien, S., Johnston, M., Frank, J., Giuliano, M., Kavelaars, A., Lenzen, C., and Policella, N. (2012, January 11–15). A generalized timeline representation, services, and interface for automating space mission operations. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Space Operations, Stockholm, Sweden.10.2514/6.2012-1275459 ↗
6. Dynamic scheduling for emergency tasks on distributed imaging satellites with task merging10.1109/TPDS.2013.156 ↗
7. Optimal Mission Planning for Multiple Agile Satellites Using Modified Dynamic Programming
8. Numerical method for rapidly determining satellite-satellite and satellite-ground station in-view periods10.2514/3.20177 ↗
9. Rise and set time of a satellite about an oblate planet10.2514/3.2057 ↗
10. Rapid determination of satellite visibility periods
11. Coverage area determination for conical fields of view considering an oblate earth10.2514/1.G004156 ↗
12. Katona, Z., and Donner, A. (2008, January 1–3). On mean visibility time of non-repeating satellite orbits. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Satellite and Space Communications, Toulouse, France.10.1109/IWSSC.2008.4656802 ↗
13. Predicting the visibility of LEO satellites10.1109/7.805436 ↗
14. Satellite orbit design and maintenance for terrestrial coverage10.2514/1.44120 ↗
15. Sun, X.C., Cui, H.Z., Han, C., and Geshi, T. (February, January 29). APCHI technique for rapidly and accurately predicting multi-restriction satellite visibility. Proceedings of the 22nd AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Charleston, CA, USA.
16. Rapid satellite-to-site visibility determination based on self-adaptive interpolation technique10.1007/s11431-016-0513-8 ↗
17. Onboard satellite visibility prediction using meta modeling based framework10.1016/j.ast.2019.105377 ↗
18. Palmer, P., and Mai, Y. (2000, January 21–24). A fast prediction algorithm of satellite passes. Proceedings of the 14th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellite, Utah State University, Logna, UT, USA.
19. Fast prediction algorithms of satellite imaging opportunities with attitude controls10.2514/2.4948 ↗
20. Feuerstein, P., Eric, P.H., Matthew, L.G., Kevin, G.C., Kirk, C.F., and Frank, L.G. (2004, January 18–22). Generalized representation of space-based platforms for various orbit types. Proceedings of the Advanced Simulation Technologies Conference, Arlington, TX, USA.
21. Geometric analysis and design method for discontinuous coverage satellite constellations10.2514/1.60756 ↗
22. Multi-satellites imaging scheduling using individual reconfiguration based integer coding genetic algorithm10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.041 ↗
23. Novel method to calculate satellite visibility for an arbitrary sensor field10.1016/j.ast.2021.106668 ↗
24. Coverage analysis for elliptical-orbit satellites based on 2D map10.1109/TAES.2023.3240675 ↗
25. Fast simulation algorithm for area target visibility using remote sensing satellites
26. A novel grid point approach for efficiently solving the constellation-to-ground regional coverage problem10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2864181 ↗
27. Visible time window calculation based on map segmentation for task planning
28. Imaging-duration embedded dynamic scheduling of Earth observation satellites for emergent events
29. Mukundan, A., and Wang, H.C. (2021). Simplified approach to detect satellite maneuvers using TLE data and simplified perturbation model utilizing orbital element variation. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110181 ↗
30. Riesing, K. (2015, January 10–13). Orbit determination from two line element sets of ISS-deployed cubesats. Proceedings of the AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA.
31. Coverage analysis of remote sensing satellites in Concurrent Design Facility10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001397 ↗
32. Geometric analysis of ground-target coverage from a satellite by field-mapping method10.2514/1.G005719 ↗
33. A Fast Algorithm for Imaging Time Window Prediction of Optical Satellites Considering J_2 Perturbation for Imaging Mission Scheduling
34. Space physics coordinate transformations: A user guide10.1016/0032-0633(92)90012-D ↗
35. Observation mission planning for maneuverable satellite constellation towards multiple area targets
36. Ian, C., and Sleightholme, J. (2015). Introduction to Programming with Fortran, Springer.
37. An accurate and automated approach to georectification of HDF-EOS swath data10.14358/PERS.70.4.397 ↗
38. Spherical linear interpolation and Bézier curves
39. Binary search algorithm
40. (2023, December 23). Celestrak Homepage. Available online: http://celestrak.com/.