journal article·2018-09

Investigation of the stress rupture behavior of GTD-111 superalloy melted by VIM/VAR

Ainaz Agh, Alireza Amini

Publisher page

Abstract

The effects of vacuum induction melting (VIM) and vacuum arc remelting (VAR) processes on the microstructure and stress rupture properties of Ni-based GTD-111 superalloy were investigated. Samples of GTD-111 master alloy were melted in VIM and VAR furnaces and then poured into a preheated ceramic mold for VIM melt or into a water-cooled copper mold for VAR melt. The as-cast samples were examined radiographically to ensure that no casting defects were present in the final castings; the samples were then heat-treated using a standard heat-treatment cycle. The microstructure of the samples was investigated using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy in conjunction with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy for microanalysis. On the basis of standard ASTM-E139, stress rupture tests were carried out at 1000°C under a stress of 300 MPa. The results showed that a γ matrix, fine γ′ precipitates, a γ–γ′ eutectic structure, carbide particles, and some harmful phases such as σ and η phases were present in the as-cast samples. The γ′ precipitates with cubic morphology appeared in the matrix after the standard heat-treatment process. The extent of segregation and the amount of γ–γ′ eutectic structure formed in the VAR-prepared sample were less than in the VIM-prepared sample. The results of stress rupture tests showed that the rupture time for the VAR sample was 43% longer than that for the VIM sample.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. S.A. Sajjadi, S. Nategh, and R.I.L. Guthrie, Study of microstructure and mechanical properties of high performance Ni-base superalloy GTD-111, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 325(2002), No. 1–2, p. 484.10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01709-9 ↗
2. B.G. Choi, I.S. Kim, D.H. Kim, and C.Y. Jo, Temperature dependence of MC decomposition behavior in Ni-base superalloy GTD 111, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 478(2008), No. 1–2, p. 329.10.1016/j.msea.2007.06.010 ↗
3. H.I. Kim, H.S. Park, J.M. Koo, C.S. Seok, S.H. Yang, and M. Y. Kim, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 26(2012). No. 7, p. 2019.
4. S.A. Sajjadi, S.M. Zebarjad, R.I. L. Guthrie, and M. Isac, Microstructure evolution of high-performance Ni-base superalloy GTD-111 with heat treatment parameters, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 175(2006), No. 1–3, p. 376.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.021 ↗
5. C.X. Yang, Y.L. Xu, Z.X. Zhang, H. Nie, X.S. Xiao, G.Q. Jia, and Z. Shen, Improvement of stress-rupture life of GTD-111 by second solution heat treatment, Mater. Des., 45(2013), p. 308.10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.011 ↗
6. S.A. Sajjadi and S. Nategh, A high temperature deformation mechanism map for the high performance Ni-base superalloy GTD-111, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 307(2001), No. 1–2, p. 158.10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01822-0 ↗
7. S. Sathian, Metallurgical and Mechanical Properties of Ni-Based Superalloy Friction Welds [Dissertation], University of Toronto, Toronto, 1999.
8. S.A. Sajjadi, S. Nategh, M. Isac, and S.M. Zebarjad, Tensile deformation mechanisms at different temperatures in the Ni-base superalloy GTD-111, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 155(2004), p. 1900.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.273 ↗
9. S. Nategh and S.A. Sajjadi, Dislocation network formation during creep in Ni-base superalloy GTD-111, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 339(2003), No. 1–2, p. 103.10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00125-9 ↗
10. J.J. Yu, X.F. Sun, T. Jin, N.R. Zhao, H.R. Guan, and Z.Q. Hu, High temperature creep and low cycle fatigue of a nickel-base superalloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527(2010), No. 9, p. 2379.10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.001 ↗
11. ASTM, E139-11, Standard Test Method for Conducting Creep, Creep-Rupture and Stress-Rupture Tests of Metallic Materials, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 2011.
12. J. Ding, S. Jiang, Y.M. Li, Y.T. Wu, J. Wu, Y.Y. Peng, X. He, X.C. Xia, C. Li, and Y.C. Liu, Microstructure evolution behavior of Ni3Al (γ′) phase in eutectic γ-γ′ of Ni3Al-based alloy, Intermetallics, 98(2018), p. 28.10.1016/j.intermet.2018.04.010 ↗
13. R. Kakitani, R.V. Reyes, A. Garcia, J.E. Spinelli, and N. Cheung, Relationship between spacing of eutectic colonies and tensile properties of transient directionally solidified Al−Ni eutectic alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 733(2018), p. 59.10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.288 ↗
14. W.F. Smith, Structure and Properties of Engineering Alloys, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987.
15. J.L. Liu, T. Jin, J.J. Yu, X.F. Sun, H.R. Guan, and Z.Q. Hu, Effect of thermal exposure on stress rupture properties of a Re bearing Ni base single crystal superalloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527(2010), No. 4–5, p. 890.10.1016/j.msea.2009.10.001 ↗
16. G.S. Ansell and J.W. Weertman, Creep of Dispersion-Hardened Aluminum Alloy, Naval Research Lab., Washington DC, 1958.
17. H.J. Chang, M.C. Fivel, and J.L. Strudel, Micromechanics of primary creep in Ni base superalloys. Int. J. Plast., 108(2018), p. 21.10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.04.009 ↗