journal article·2024-01-11Open access

Computational Assessment of the Deposited Power and the Temperature Increase around Two Coupled Implanted Leads Inside a 1.5 T MRI Scanner

George Tsanidis, Theodoros Samaras

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 2

Abstract

A specific method for the estimation of the induced power at the tip by an active implantable medical device (AIMD) during an MRI scan is not defined in ISO/TS 10974:2018 for the cases of devices with multiple leads or the presence of abandoned and retained leads, where coupling between two leads could take place. Therefore, the aim of this work is to evaluate a numerical method, similar to Tier 3 of ISO/TS 10974:2018, for the estimation of the deposited power at the tips of two coupled implanted leads. Specifically, the proposed methodology applies the same parameters as the standard Tier 3 process. However, these parameters are calculated for each implant in the presence of its neighbors in order to include the coupling between them. Numerical electromagnetic simulations were performed, in which a pair of generic implant leads was excited and placed at various positions relative to each other. The deposited power at the tips of the pair was analyzed based on the standard Tier 3 approach, and the results show that this could overestimate the induced power by more than 6 dB. Therefore, a modified Tier 3 numerical method for the estimation of the deposited power at their tips is proposed, which can produce a reliable calculation. This method was confirmed by evaluating various configurations of the two leads excited by orthogonal electrical fields, and also its uncertainty budget was developed. Finally, the method was repeated for different properties of the generic implants and the surrounding tissue, as well as for a pair of realistic implants and in vivo implantation trajectories.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Neurological disorders and treatments · Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

Thessaloniki Software Solutions (THESS) S.A., Technopolis ICT Business Park, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece

Department of Physics, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe for Patients with Neurostimulation Systems Used for Deep Brain Stimulation?10.1227/01.NEU.0000186935.87971.2a ↗
2. Trends in permanent pacemaker implantation in The United States 1993–2009: Increasing complexity of patients and procedures10.1016/S0735-1097(12)60704-9 ↗
3. Evaluation of Cumulative Effects of MR Imaging on Pacemaker Systems at 1.5 Tesla10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02570.x ↗
4. Neuroimaging and Deep Brain Stimulation10.3174/ajnr.A1644 ↗
5. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes10.1016/S0002-8703(97)70083-8 ↗
6. Cardiac pacemaker: In vitro assessment at 1.5 T10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.015 ↗
7. MR Imaging and Cardiac Pacemakers: In Vitro Evaluation and in Vivo Studies in 51 Patients at 0.5 T10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn08869 ↗
8. Mattei, E., Triventi, M., Calcagnini, G., Censi, F., Kainz, W., Mendoza, G., Bassen, H.I., and Bartolini, P. (2008). Complexity of MRI induced heating on metallic leads: Experimental measurements of 374 configurations. Biomed. Eng. Online, 7.10.1186/1475-925X-7-11 ↗
9. In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging10.1093/eurheartj/ehi009 ↗
10. Modern Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Systems Can Be Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe10.1161/01.CIR.0000137121.28722.33 ↗
11. In vitro investigation of pacemaker lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging: Role of implant geometry10.1002/jmri.21536 ↗
12. Reducing RF-related heating of cardiac pacemaker leads in MRI: Implementation and experimental verification of practical design changes10.1002/mrm.24197 ↗
13. The dependence of radiofrequency induced pacemaker lead tip heating on the electrical conductivity of the medium at the lead tip10.1002/mrm.23235 ↗
14. Measuring RF-induced currents inside implants: Impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads10.1002/mrm.21881 ↗
15. Power deposition inside a phantom for testing of MRI heating10.1109/TMAG.2005.854840 ↗
16. Impact of imaging landmark on the risk of MRI-related heating near implanted medical devices like cardiac pacemaker leads10.1002/mrm.22592 ↗
17. Variability in RF-induced heating of a deep brain stimulation implant across MR systems10.1002/jmri.20769 ↗
18. (2018). Assessment of the Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with an Active Implantable Medical Device (Standard No. ISO/TS 10974:2018).
19. Calculation of MRI-induced heating of an implanted medical lead wire with an electric field transfer function10.1002/jmri.21159 ↗
20. Yu, C.M., Hayes, D.L., and Auricchio, A. (2014). Cases in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Elsevier Saunders.
21. Jiang, Z., Pajic, M., Moarref, S., Alur, R., and Mangharam, R. (2012). Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems: 18th International Conference, TACAS 2012, Proceedings of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2012, Springer. Proceedings 18.
22. RF-induced heating in tissue near bilateral DBS implants during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T: The role of surgical lead management10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.034 ↗
23. Neural and connective tissue response to long-term implantation of multiple contact nerve cuff electrodes10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200005)50:2<215::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
24. Pre-MRI procedure screening: Recommendations and safety considerations for biomedical implants and devices10.1002/1522-2586(200009)12:3<510::AID-JMRI19>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
25. Changes in the specific absorption rate (SAR) of radiofrequency energy in patients with retained cardiac leads during MRI at 1.5T and 3T10.1002/mrm.27350 ↗
26. Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker-attached leads at 1.5 tesla MRI10.1002/jmri.22463 ↗
27. Stijnman, P., Tokaya, J., van den Berg, C., and Raaijmakers, A. (2018, January 16–21). The Transfer Function for Implanted Wires When a Second Wire Is Near. Proceedings of the Joint Annual Meeting of ISMRM-ESMRMB, Paris, France.
28. Impact of capped and uncapped abandoned leads on the heating of an MR-conditional pacemaker implant10.1002/mrm.25106 ↗
29. Radiofrequency-induced heating of broken and abandoned implant leads during magnetic resonance examinations10.1002/mrm.28836 ↗
30. A Novel Implant Electrode Design Safe in the RF Field of MRI Scanners10.1109/TMTT.2017.2669977 ↗
31. Coupled transfer function model for the evaluation of implanted cables safety in MRI10.1002/mrm.28146 ↗
32. A Technique to Evaluate MRI-Induced Electric Fields at the Ends of Practical Implanted Lead10.1109/TMTT.2014.2376523 ↗
33. Tsanidis, G., and Samaras, T. (2020). Numerical calculation of the radiofrequency transfer function of cochlear implants for assessing deposited power in MRI. Phys. Med. Biol., 65.10.1088/1361-6560/ab9fc7 ↗
34. A single setup approach for the MRI based measurement and validation of the transfer function of elongated medical implants10.1002/mrm.28840 ↗
35. Yao, A., Zastrow, E., and Kuster, N. (2017, January 22–24). Test field diversification method forthe safety assessment of RF-induced heating of AIMDs during 1.5-T MRI. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Honolulu, HI, USA.
36. An Efficient Methodology for the Analysis of Dielectric Shimming Materials in Magnetic Resonance Imaging10.1109/TMI.2016.2624507 ↗
37. Construction and modeling of a reconfigurable MRI coil for lowering SAR in patients with deep brain stimulation implants10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.056 ↗
38. McElcheran, C.E., Yang, B., Anderson, K.J.T., Golenstani-Rad, L., and Graham, S.J. (2015). Investigation of Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission for the Reduction of Heating in Long Conductive Leads in 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0134379 ↗
39. A Novel Device Model Validation Strategy for 1.5- and 3-T MRI Heating Safety Assessment10.1109/TIM.2020.2971292 ↗
40. Modeling radiofrequency responses of realistic multi-electrode leads containing helical and straight wires10.1007/s10334-019-00793-9 ↗
41. Development of a new generation of high-resolution anatomical models for medical device evaluation: The Virtual Population 3.010.1088/0031-9155/59/18/5287 ↗
42. Analysis of the Role of Lead Resistivity in Specific Absorption Rate for Deep Brain Stimulator Leads at 3T MRI10.1109/TMI.2010.2040624 ↗
43. Evaluation of the RF Heating of a Generic Deep Brain Stimulator Exposed in 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Scanners10.1002/bem.21745 ↗
44. Hu, W., Wang, Y., Wang, Q., Islam, M.Z., Tsang, J., Kainz, W., and Chen, J. (2021, January 4–10). RF-Induced Heating for Active Implantable Medical Device with Dual Parallel Leads under, MRI. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (APS/URSI), Singapore.10.1109/APS/URSI47566.2021.9704099 ↗
45. Kabil, J., Missoffe, A., Vuissoz, P., Pasquier, C., and Felblinger, J. (2017, January 22–27). Quantification and impact of lead coupling on RF-induced heating in MRI. Proceedings of the ISMRM 25th Annual Meeting, Honolulu, HI, USA.