journal article·2023-12-28Open access

The Effects of Different Drivers’ Steering Inputs on the Response of Heavy Ground Vehicles to Crosswind Disturbances

Tural Tunay, Lars Drugge, Ciarán J. O’Reilly

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

The general approach in the previous studies was to ignore the driver’s steering contribution to a vehicle while investigating the interactions between crosswind and vehicle. Therefore, the goal of this study is to find out how steering inputs by drivers affect a heavy-ground vehicle’s dynamic reaction to crosswinds. In the investigation, a two-way interaction between vehicle dynamics and aerodynamic simulations was employed. The steering inputs of drivers were modelled using a driver model taken from the previous literature that is able to reproduce the steering responses of a human driver. The study’s findings demonstrated that the steering inputs made by drivers significantly impacted how the vehicle responded to crosswinds. For instance, the greatest lateral displacement of the least skilled driver (Driver 1) was around 1.53 times the greatest lateral displacement of the most skilled driver (Driver 3) at the delay time of tδ,delay = 0.5 s in the steering input. Additionally, the maximum lateral displacement results of Driver 1 and Driver 3 at tδ,delay = 1.0 s became 1.39 and 1.56 times greater than their maximum lateral displacement results at tδ,delay = 0.5 s. Similarly, the total steering inputs of Driver 1 and Driver 3 at tδ,delay = 1.0 s were 1.4 and 2.2 times greater than their total steering inputs at tδ,delay = 0.5 s, respectively. In general, the results of a driver who is more skilled than Driver 1 (Driver 2) fall in between the respective results of Driver 1 and Driver 3. On the other hand, each driver’s total steering inputs at tδ,delay = 0.5 s were roughly the same as their total steering inputs at tδ,delay = 0 s. In all delay scenarios for the start of the driver’s steering inputs, the drivers’ steering inputs amplified the yaw moment applied to the vehicle. Meanwhile, they diminished the lateral force and roll moment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Fire dynamics and safety research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, Adana 01250, Turkey

Department of Engineering Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 8, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

The Centre for ECO2 Vehicle Design, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 8, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Funding

Swedish Innovation Agency Vinnova · Centre for ECO2 Vehicle Design at KTH · Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at the PDC Centre for High-Performance Computing (PDC-HPC)

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Crosswinds and transients: Reality, simulation and effects10.4271/2011-01-0172 ↗
2. Method to Correlate Vehicular Behaviour and Driver’s Judgement Under Side Wind Disturbances10.1080/00423118808969292 ↗
3. Lee, S., Kasahara, M., and Mori, Y. (2013, January 4–7). Roll Damping control of a heavy vehicle under the strong crosswind. Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Automotive Control, The International Federation of Automatic Control, Tokyo, Japan.
4. Advanced Vehicle Dynamics of Heavy Trucks with the Perspective of Road Safety10.1080/00423114.2017.1319964 ↗
5. Juhlin, M., and Eriksson, P.A. (2004, January 26–28). Vehicle parameter study on crosswind sensitivity of buses. Proceedings of the SAE Commercial Vehicle Engineering Congress and Exhibition, Chicago, IL, USA.10.4271/2004-01-2612 ↗
6. Two-way coupled aerodynamics and vehicle dynamics simulations of a heavy ground vehicle subjected to crosswind of various frequencies10.1177/09544070221088070 ↗
7. Assessment of a Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Model in Crosswind Simulation of a Heavy Ground Vehicle10.4271/02-15-01-0002 ↗
8. Klomp, M., Bruzelius, F., Nielsen, J., and Hillemyr, A. (2020). Advances in Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, IAVSD 2019, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-38077-9 ↗
9. On coupling methods used to simulate the dynamic characteristics of heavy ground vehicles subjected to crosswind10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104194 ↗
10. Orlova, A., and Cole, D. (2021). Advances in Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks II, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, IAVSD 2021, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-07305-2 ↗
11. High speed driving stability of road vehicles under crosswinds: An aerodynamic and vehicle dynamic parametric sensitivity analysis10.1080/00423114.2021.1903516 ↗
12. Effects of wind loads and floating bridge motion on intercity bus lateral stability10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104589 ↗
13. Zhang, Q., Su, C., Zhou, Y., Zhang, C., Ding, J., and Wang, Y. (2020). Numerical Investigation on Handling Stability of a Heavy Tractor Semi-Trailer under Crosswind. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10113672 ↗
14. Du, X., and Wang, G. (2022). Analysis of Operating Safety of Tractor-Trailer under Crosswind in Cold Mountainous Areas. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122412755 ↗
15. Liu, H., Liu, C., Hao, L., and Zhang, D. (2023). Stability Analysis of Lane-Keeping Assistance System for Trucks under Crosswind Conditions. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13179891 ↗
16. Theissen, P. (2012). Unsteady Vehicle Aerodynamics in Gusty Crosswind. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universitat München].
17. Wanner, D., Drugge, L., Edren, J., and Stensson Trigell, A. (2015, January 9–11). Modelling and experimental evaluation of driver behaviour during single wheel hub motor failures. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Future Active Safety Technology Towards Zero Traffic Accidents (FASTzero’15), Gothenburg, Sweden.
18. Aerodynamic loads on buses due to crosswind gusts: Extended analysis10.1080/00423111003739814 ↗
19. Wagner, A., and Wiedemann, J. (2002, January 4–7). Crosswind behavior in the driver’s perspective. Proceedings of the SAE 2002 World Congress, Detroit, MI, USA.10.4271/2002-01-0086 ↗
20. Driving simulator experiment on the moving stability of an automobile under strong crosswind10.1016/j.jweia.2005.12.006 ↗
21. Coupling aerodynamics to vehicle dynamics in transient crosswinds including a driver model10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.08.006 ↗
22. Gutierrez, W.T., Hassan, B., Croll, R.H., and Rutledge, W.H. (1996, January 26–29). Aerodynamics overview of the ground transportation systems (GTS) project for heavy vehicle drag reduction. Proceedings of the SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, USA.10.4271/960906 ↗
23. Evaluation of CFD methodologies for prediction of flows around simplified and complex automotive models10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105297 ↗
24. Investigating the aerodynamic drag and noise characteristics of a standard squareback vehicle with inclined side-view mirror configurations using a hybrid computational aeroacoustics (CAA) approach10.1063/5.0156111 ↗
25. An IDDES study of the near-wake flow topology of a simplified heavy vehicle
26. Saini, R., Karimi, N., Duan, L., Sadiki, A., and Mehdizadeh, A. (2018). Effects of NearWall Modeling in the Improved-Delayed-Detached-Eddy-Simulation (IDDES) Methodology. Entropy, 20.10.3390/e20100771 ↗
27. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001 ↗
28. Croll, R.H., Gutierrez, W.T., Hassan, B., Suazo, J.E., and Riggins, A.J. (1996, January 26–29). Experimental investigation of the ground transportation systems (gts) project for heavy vehicle drag reduction. Proceedings of the SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, USA.10.4271/960907 ↗
29. Storms, B.L., Ross, J.C., Heineck, J.T., Walker, S.M., Driver, D.M., and Zilliac, G.G. (2001). An Experimental Study of the Ground Transportation System (GTS) Model in the NASA Ames 7-by 10-ft Wind Tunnel. (NASA TM-2001-209621).
30. Unaune, S.V., Sovani, S.D., and Kim, S.E. (2005, January 11–14). Aerodynamics of a Generic Ground Transportation System: Detached Eddy Simulation. Proceedings of the 2005 SAE World Congress, Detroit, MI, USA.10.4271/2005-01-0548 ↗
31. Ghuge, H. (2007). Detached Eddy Simulations of a simplified Tractor-Trailer Geometry. [Master’s Thesis, Auburn University].10.2514/6.2006-3858 ↗
32. CD-Adapco Inc. (2016). STAR-CCM+ 11.0 User Guide, CD-Adapco Inc.
33. Influence of unsteady aerodynamics on driving dynamics of passenger cars10.1080/00423114.2014.944191 ↗
34. Heavy-Vehicle Response to Crosswind: Evaluation of Driver Reactions Using a Dynamic Driving Simulator10.3390/vehicles5010020 ↗
35. Blundell, M., and Harty, D. (2015). The Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].
36. Wang, H. (2013). Robust Control for Steer-by-Wire Systems in Road Vehicles. [Ph.D. Thesis, Swinburne University of Technology].