Predicting Task Planning Ability for Learners Engaged in Searching as Learning Based on Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
The growing utilization of web-based search engines for learning purposes has led to increased studies on searching as learning (SAL). In order to achieve the desired learning outcomes, web learners have to carefully plan their learning objectives. Previous SAL research has proposed the significant influence of task planning quality on learning outcomes. Therefore, accurately predicting web-based learners’ task planning abilities, particularly in the context of SAL, is of paramount importance for both web-based search engines and recommendation systems. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a method for predicting the ability of task planning for web learners. Specifically, we first introduced a tree-based representation method to capture how learners plan their learning tasks. Subsequently, we proposed a method based on the deep learning technique to accurately predict the SAL task planning ability for web learners. Experimental results indicate that, compared to baseline approaches, our proposed method can provide a more effective representation of learners’ task planning and deliver more accurate predictions of learners’ task planning abilities in SAL.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Online Learning and Analytics · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China
School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China
Software College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China
Funding
national natural science foundation of China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. A Personalized Group-Based Recommendation Approach for Web Search in E-Learning10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2850376 ↗
2. The Search as Learning Spaceship: Toward a Comprehensive Model of Psychological and Technological Facets of Search as Learning10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827748 ↗
3. Process patterns and conceptual changes in knowledge representations during information seeking and sensemaking: A qualitative user study10.1177/0165551515615834 ↗
4. Examining the Effects of MOOCs Learners’ Social Searching Results on Learning Behaviors and Learning Outcomes10.12973/eurasia.2016.1282a ↗
5. Editorial: Recent advances on searching as learning: An introduction to the special issue10.1177/0165551515614473 ↗
6. Towards searching as a learning process: A review of current perspectives and future directions10.1177/0165551515615841 ↗
7. Piech, C., Sahami, M., Koller, D., Cooper, S., and Blikstein, P. (March, January 29). Modeling how students learn to program. Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘12), Raleigh, NC, USA.
8. Li, P., Zhang, B., and Zhang, Y. (2022). Extracting Searching as Learning Tasks Based on IBRT Approach. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12125879 ↗
9. Searching as learning: A systematization based on literature10.1177/0165551515615833 ↗
10. Bhattacharya, N. (2023, January 23–28). LongSAL: A Longitudinal Search as Learning Study with University Students. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘23), Hamburg, Germany.10.1145/3544549.3583948 ↗
11. Deconstructing search tasks in interactive information retrieval: A systematic review of task dimensions and predictors10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102522 ↗
12. Relationships among tasks, collaborative inquiry processes, inquiry resolutions, and knowledge outcomes in adolescents during guided discovery-based game design in school10.1177/0165551515614537 ↗
13. Santos, O.C., and Boticario, J.G. (2012). Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies: Practices and Challenges, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-61350-489-5 ↗
14. Predicting School Failure and Dropout by Using Data Mining Techniques
15. Navathe, S., Wu, W., Shekhar, S., Du, X., Wang, S., and Xiong, H. (2016). Database Systems for Advanced Applications, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference, DASFAA 2016, Dallas, TX, USA, 16–19 April 2016, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-32049-6 ↗
16. Agrawal, R., Golshan, B., and Terzi, E. (2014, January 24–27). Grouping students in educational settings. Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ‘14), New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2623330.2623748 ↗
17. Bockmon, R., Cooper, S., Gratch, J., Zhang, J., and Dorodchi, M. (2020, January 15–19). Can Students’ Spatial Skills Predict Their Programming Abilities?. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘20), Trondheim, Norway.10.1145/3341525.3387380 ↗
18. Pardi, G., von Hoyer, J., Holtz, P., and Kammerer, Y. (2020, January 14–18). The Role of Cognitive Abilities and Time Spent on Texts and Videos in a Multimodal Searching as Learning Task. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ‘20), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/3343413.3378001 ↗
19. Ghosh, S., Rath, M., and Shah, C. (2018, January 11–15). Searching as Learning: Exploring Search Behavior and Learning Outcomes in Learning-related Tasks. Proceedings of the CHIIR ‘18: Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.10.1145/3176349.3176386 ↗
20. Demaree, D., Jarodzka, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., and Kammerer, Y. (2020, January 14–18). The Influence of Device Type on Querying Behavior and Learning Outcomes in a Searching as Learning Task with a Laptop or Smartphone. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ‘20), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/3343413.3378000 ↗
21. Syed, R., and Collins-Thompson, K. (201, January 7–11). Retrieval Algorithms Optimized for Human Learning. Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ‘17), Tokyo, Japan.
22. Syed, R., Collins-Thompson, K., Bennett, P.N., Teng, M., Williams, S., Tay, W.W., and Iqbal, S. (2020, January 20–24). Improving Learning Outcomes with Gaze Tracking and Automatic Question Generation. Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020 (WWW ‘20), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1145/3366423.3380240 ↗
23. Roy, N., Torre, M.V., Gadiraju, U., Maxwell, D., and Hauff, C. (202, January 14–19). Note the Highlight: Incorporating Active Reading Tools in a Search as Learning Environment. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ‘21), Canberra, Australia.10.1145/3406522.3446025 ↗
24. How Does Domain Expertise Affect Users’ Search Interaction and Outcome in Exploratory Search?10.1145/3223045 ↗
25. El Zein, D., Câmara, A., Da Costa Pereira, C., and Tettamanzi, A. (2023, January 19–23). RULKNE: Representing User Knowledge State in Search-as-Learning with Named Entities. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ‘23), Austin, TX, USA.10.1145/3576840.3578330 ↗
26. Liu, J., and Jung, Y.J. (2021, January 14–19). Interest Development, Knowledge Learning, and Interactive IR: Toward a State-based Approach to Search as Learning. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ‘21), Canberra, Australia.10.1145/3406522.3446015 ↗
27. Collins-Thompson, K., Rieh, S.Y., Haynes, C.C., and Syed, R. (2021, January 14–19). Assessing Learning Outcomes in Web Search: A Comparison of Tasks and Query Strategies. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ‘16), Canberra, Australia.10.1145/2854946.2854972 ↗
28. A multi-constraint learning path recommendation algorithm based on knowledge map10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.011 ↗
29. Wang, J.F., and Lau, R. (2013). Advances in Web-Based Learning—ICWL 2013, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Kenting, Taiwan, 6–9 October 2013, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-41175-5 ↗
30. Mehrotra, R., and Yilmaz, E. (2017, January 7–11). Extracting Hierarchies of Search Tasks & Subtasks via a Bayesian Nonparametric Approach. Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ‘17), Tokyo, Japan.10.1145/3077136.3080823 ↗
31. Q-Learning for Shift-Reduce Parsing in Indonesian Tree-LSTM-Based Text Generation10.1145/3490501 ↗
32. Lin, J.-L., Kuo, J.-C., and Chuang, H.-W. (2020). Improving Density Peak Clustering by Automatic Peak Selection and Single Linkage Clustering. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12071168 ↗
33. Automatic Determination of Clustering Centers for “Clustering by Fast Search and Find of Density Peaks”10.1155/2020/4724150 ↗
34. HCDC: A novel hierarchical clustering algorithm based on density-distance cores for data sets with varying density10.1016/j.is.2022.102159 ↗
35. Ahmed, M., Samee, M., and Mercer, R. (February, January 30). Improving Tree-LSTM with Tree Attention. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Newport Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/ICOSC.2019.8665673 ↗
36. Shido, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Yamamoto, A., Miyamoto, A., and Matsumura, T. (2019, January 14–19). Automatic Source Code Summarization with Extended Tree-LSTM. Proceedings of the 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851751 ↗
37. Yu, X., Li, G., Chai, C., and Tang, N. (2020, January 20–24). Reinforcement Learning with Tree-LSTM for Join Order Selection. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/ICDE48307.2020.00116 ↗
38. A Review of Recurrent Neural Networks: LSTM Cells and Network Architectures10.1162/neco_a_01199 ↗
39. Neural machine translation with Gumbel Tree-LSTM based encoder10.1016/j.jvcir.2020.102811 ↗
40. A survey on long short-term memory networks for time series prediction10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.088 ↗
41. Tai, K.S., Socher, R., and Manning, C.D. (2015, January 26–31). Improved Semantic Representations From Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networks. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Beijing, China.10.3115/v1/P15-1150 ↗
42. Bayesian hierarchical community discovery
43. MMR: An algorithm for clustering categorical data using Rough Set Theory10.1016/j.datak.2007.05.005 ↗
44. Jin, W. Graph Mining with Graph Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM ‘21).
45. An Attention-based Rumor Detection Model with Tree-structured Recursive Neural Networks10.1145/3391250 ↗