Research on Bidirectional Reservation Method for Anti-Permeation Geomembrane Slack
Source abstract
Abstract
Geomembrane relaxation can effectively prevent the geomembrane from being damaged by tensile stresses caused by temperature changes and uneven settlement of the foundation. Existing and commonly used reservation methods, such as wave-shaped, groove-shaped, and Z-shaped techniques, are unidirectional and cannot resist multidirectional tensile stresses in geomembranes. Therefore, we propose three methods for reserving bidirectional geomembranes, including the cross-groove-shaped, cross-Z-shaped, and combined Z- and groove-shaped techniques. Additionally, we investigate the key issues of these methods and their practicality through field tests and theoretical analyses. The results of the study show that the cross-groove-shaped technique is prone to geomembrane folding at the corners of the cross-intersection, and it is necessary to set a wiping angle of approximately 35° to solve the problem. The cross-Z-shaped technique does not require grooving and reduces the amount of civil construction performed. However, the neoprene rods cannot be folded 180° or restored after being separated once. The combined Z- and groove-shaped technique has no folding phenomenon and does not require 180° of folding. With a lack of folding, including 180° folding, the number of grooves can be reduced by half, but the cross-Z-shaped specimen cannot be restored after separation. In practical applications, it is recommended to use the cross-groove-shaped method or to choose a suitable bidirectional reservation method according to the actual requirements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250000, China
Water Resources Research Institute of Shandong Province, Jinan 250000, China
Shandong Survey and Design Institute of Water Conservancy Co., Ltd., Jinan 250013, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Sharma, H.D., and Reddy, K.R. (2004). Geoenvironmental Engineering: Site Remediation, Waste Containment and Emerging Waste Management Technologies, John Wiley & Sons.
2. Field Experimental of Eliminating Geomembrane Air Expansion by Vacuumizing for Plain Reservoir10.1520/GTJ20160276 ↗
3. Experimental Study on Air Expansion Deformation of Composite Geomembrane under Ring-Restrained Condition10.1520/GTJ20180381 ↗
4. Lavoie, F.L., Valentin, C.A., Kobelnik, M., Lins da Silva, J., and Lopes, M.D.L. (2020). HDPE Geomembranes for Environmental Protection: Two Case Studies. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12208682 ↗
5. Advances in calculating thermally induced stresses in nonlinear viscoelastic materials10.1002/pen.11465 ↗
6. Imaizumi, S., Kawamata, K., and Tsuboi, M. (1999, January 4–8). Study on thermal stress within the geomembrane liner induced by temperature decrease. Proceedings of the 7th International Landfill Symposium, Cagliari, Italy.
7. Analysis of ductile and brittle failures from creep rupture testing of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes10.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.084 ↗
8. Axisymmetric temperature- and stress-dependent creep response of ‘new’ and ‘old’ HDPE geomembranes10.1680/gein.2005.12.3.156 ↗
9. Zhang, X., Ma, Z., Wu, Y., and Liu, J. (2021). Response of Mechanical Properties of Polyvinyl Chloride Geomembrane to Ambient Temperature in Axial Tension. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112210864 ↗
10. Development and application of multi-functional biaxial tensile testing machine for geosynthetics
11. Shear-induced changes in smooth geomembrane surface topography at different ambient temperatures10.1680/jgein.15.00036 ↗
12. Comparison of Geomembranes Subjected to Differential Settlement10.1680/gein.2.0043 ↗
13. Wu, H., Feng, L., Teng, Z., and Shu, Y. (2021). Model Test on Mechanical and Deformation Property of a Geomembrane Surface Barrier for a High Rockfill Dam. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311505 ↗
14. Evaluation of temperature stress and stress relaxation properties of HDPE sheet
15. Study on temperature stress of HDPE geomembrane
16. Mechanism and analytic model of wrinkled geomembranes around circular structures subjected to differential settlement
17. (1998). Brief Introduction of Technical Specification for Application of Synthetic Materials to Soil Engineering GB (Standard No. GB50290-98).
18. (2016). Code for Construction of Geosynthetics for Hydropower and Water Conservancy Projects (Standard No. DL/T 5743-2016).
19. (1998). Standard for Applications of Geosynthetics in Hydraulic and Hydro-Power Engineering (Standard No. SL/T225-98).
20. Talk about evaporation pond laying geomembrane construction requirements
21. Design Difficulties and Solutions for Water Supply Project in Tangshan Leting New District
22. (2023, May 01). Available online: https://www.docin.com/p-2699715481.html.
23. Behavior of waves in high density polyethylene geomembranes: A laboratory study10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00023-5 ↗
24. A comparison of geomembrane wrinkles for nine field cases10.1680/gein.12.00030 ↗
25. Thermal Expansion and Contraction of Geomembrane Liners Subjected to Solar Exposure and Backfilling10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000694 ↗
26. Numerical simulation of geomembrane wrinkle formation10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.001 ↗
27. Analytical model for anisotropic geomembrane composites10.1016/0266-1144(90)90057-J ↗
28. Duvall, D.E. Proceedings of the Geosynthetics, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 30 March–1 April 1993.
29. Mixed numerical–experimental technique for orthotropic parameter identification using biaxial tensile tests on cruciform specimens10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.050 ↗
30. Development of geomembrane strains in waste containment facility liners with waste settlement10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.11.004 ↗
31. Experimental Study on the Influence of Aging on Mechanical Properties of Geogrids and Bearing Capacity of Reinforced Sand Cushion
32. (2019). Standard Test Method for Measuring the Nominal Thickness of Geosynthetics (Standard No. ASTM D5199-12).
33. (2020). Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Nonreinforced Polyethylene and Nonreinforced Flexible Polypropylene Geomembranes (Standard No. ASTM D6693M-20).
34. (2020). Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement (Standard No. ASTM D792-20).
35. (2020). Standard Test Method for Tear Strength of Conventional Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomers (Standard No. ASTM D624).
36. (2019). Standard Test Methods for Carbon Black Evaluation in NR (Natural Rubber) (Standard No. ASTM D3192-09).
37. (2020). Standard Test Method for Index Puncture Resistance of Geomembranes and Related Products (Standard No. ASTM D4833M-07).