A New Collector Device for the Immediate Use of Particulate Autogenous Bone Grafts
Source abstract
Abstract
Autogenous bone grafts can be harvested from either intraoral or extraoral sources. Intra-oral sources include healing tooth extraction wounds, a bone from edentulous ridges, bone trephined from within the jaw using trephine drills, bone formed in wounds, and bone from the maxillary tuberosity, ramus, and mandibular symphysis. Extra-oral sources are the iliac crest, which provides cancellous bone marrow, and the tibia and calvaria. Autogenous bone grafting aids in probing depth reduction, gaining clinical attachment, the bone filling of osseous defects, and the regeneration of new bone, cementum, and periodontal ligaments in teeth. An innovative biomedical device is presented in the form of an autogenous bone collector that can fill defects of 96.91 mm3 with bone particulates, and may be used in bioengineered scaffolds. Experimental studies on synthetic bone have demonstrated the feasibility and applicability of the amount of bone obtained.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ph.D. Engenharia Biomédica, Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 712, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
Associate Laboratory of Energy, Transports and Aerospace (LAETA), Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (INEGI), Superior Institute of Engineering of Porto (ISEP), Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal
Associate Laboratory of Energy, Transports and Aerospace (LAETA), Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (INEGI), Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 712, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Bone grafting for implant surgery10.1016/j.coms.2021.01.006 ↗
2. Histological comparison of autograft, allograft-DBM, xenograft, and synthetic grafts in a trabecular bone defect: An experimental study in rabbits
3. Bone graft materials for current implant dentistry
4. Gehrke, S.A., Mazón, P., Del Fabbro, M., Tumedei, M., Aramburú Júnior, J., Pérez-Díaz, L., and De Aza, P.N. (2019). Histological and histomorphometric analyses of two bovine bone blocks implanted in rabbit calvaria. Symmetry, 11.10.3390/sym11050641 ↗
5. Bae, E.B., Kim, H.J., Ahn, J.J., Bae, H.Y., Kim, H.J., and Huh, J.B. (2019). Comparison of bone regeneration between porcine-derived and bovine-derived xenografts in rat calvarial defects: A non-inferiority study. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12203412 ↗
6. Janjua, O.S., Qureshi, S.M., Shaikh, M.S., Alnazzawi, A., Rodriguez-Lozano, F.J., Pecci-Lloret, M.P., and Zafar, M.S. (2022). Autogenous Tooth Bone Grafts for Repair and Regeneration of Maxillofacial Defects: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19063690 ↗
7. Proportion of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone affects bone formation in the treatment of calvarial defects in rabbits10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.015 ↗
8. Chang, L.C. (2021). Comparison of Clinical Parameters in Dental Implant Therapy between Implant Site Development Using Porcine-and Bovine-Derived Xenografts. Technologies, 9.10.3390/technologies9040072 ↗
9. The choice between allograft or demineralized bone matrix is not unambiguous in trauma surgery10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.013 ↗
10. Infection in Bone Allograft Transplants
11. Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds as Immunomodulatory Biomaterials10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0538 ↗
12. Biological drilling: Implant site preparation in a conservative manner and obtaining autogenous bone grafts10.2478/bjdm-2018-0017 ↗
13. Biomechanical behaviours of the bone–implant interface: A review10.1098/rsif.2019.0259 ↗
14. Autogenous Bone Harvesting and Grafting: Intraoral Sites and Techniques
15. Bone grafting materials in dentoalveolar reconstruction: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.09.003 ↗
16. Structural analysis of the new Bioactive Kinetic Screw in titanium alloy vs. commercially pure titanium
17. Andreucci, C.A., Alshaya, A., Fonseca, E.M.M., and Jorge, R.N. (2022). Proposal for a New Bioactive Kinetic Screw in an Implant, Using a Numerical Model. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020779 ↗
18. Andreucci, C.A., Fonseca, E.M.M., and Jorge, R.N. (2022). 3D Printing as an Efficient Way to Prototype and Develop Dental Implants. BioMedInformatics, 2.10.3390/biomedinformatics2040044 ↗
19. Andreucci, C.A., Fonseca, E.M.M., and Jorge, R.N. (2022). Increased Material Density within a New Biomechanism. Math. Comput. Appl., 27.10.3390/mca27060090 ↗
20. Three-dimensional dynamic finite element and experimental models for drilling processes
21. Performance of six bone collectors designed for dental implant surgery10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01199.x ↗
22. Mit Knochenkollektor bei dentaler Implantation gewonnenes Knochenmaterial. Mikrobiologische Analyse [Bone collected with a bone collector during dental implant surgery]10.1007/s10006-004-0564-6 ↗
23. A systematic review of the effectiveness of bone collectors
24. Ben Achour, A., Petto, C., Meißner, H., Hipp, D., Nestler, A., Lauer, G., and Teicher, U. (2019). The Influence of Thrust Force on the Vitality of Bone Chips Harvested for Autologous Augmentation during Dental Implantation. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12223695 ↗
25. Greenberg, A.M., and Prein, J. (2002). Autogenous Bone Grafts in Maxillofacial Reconstruction, Springer.
26. Design, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072 ↗
27. Bone graft materials used in dental implants: A review10.18231/j.aprd.2019.014 ↗
28. Bone graft harvesting from regional sites10.1016/j.coms.2010.04.006 ↗
29. Jiménez-Beltrán, M.A., Gómez-Calderón, A.J., Quintanar-Zúñiga, R.E., Santillán-Cortez, D., Téllez-González, M.A., Suárez-Cuenca, J.A., García, S., and Mondragón-Terán, P. (2022). Electrospinning-Generated Nanofiber Scaffolds Suitable for Integration of Primary Human Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14122448 ↗
30. Lim, J.W., Jang, K.-J., Son, H., Park, S., Kim, J.E., Kim, H.B., Seonwoo, H., Choung, Y.-H., Lee, M.C., and Chung, J.H. (2021). Aligned Nanofiber-Guided Bone Regeneration Barrier Incorporated with Equine Bone-Derived Hydroxyapatite for Alveolar Bone Regeneration. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13010060 ↗
31. Hwang, S.-H., Moon, K., Du, W., Cho, W.-T., Huh, J.-B., and Bae, E.-B. (2023). Effect of Porcine- and Bovine-Derived Xenografts with Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose for Bone Formation in Rabbit Calvaria Defects. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16051850 ↗
32. Zhao, R., Yang, R., Cooper, P.R., Khurshid, Z., Shavandi, A., and Ratnayake, J. (2021). Bone grafts and substitutes in dentistry: A review of current trends and developments. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26103007 ↗
33. Fadeeva, I.S., Teterina, A.Y., Minaychev, V.V., Senotov, A.S., Smirnov, I.V., Fadeev, R.S., Smirnova, P.V., Menukhov, V.O., Lomovskaya, Y.V., and Akatov, V.S. (2023). Biomimetic Remineralized Three-Dimensional Collagen Bone Matrices with an Enhanced Osteostimulating Effect. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8010091 ↗
34. Amirazad, H., Dadashpour, M., and Zarghami, N. (2022). Application of decellularized bone matrix as a bioscaffold in bone tissue engineering. J. Biol. Eng., 16.10.1186/s13036-021-00282-5 ↗
35. Use of the novel ANSPACH bone collector for bone autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and cage fusion10.1007/s00701-009-0513-0 ↗