journal article·2023-10-10Open access

Seismogram Rearrangement as a Perspective Basis for Defining New Attributes

Ranko Babić, Lidija Babić

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 20

Abstract

Proper regulative in earthquake risk reduction, hazard assessment, earthquake resistant design and construction of structures, should be under perpetual improvement. They are mainly the result of earthquake study and analysis of post-seismic effects. In this context, a new frame for seismogram analysis is proposed, based on its decomposition into elementary and single (positive and negative) fluctuations (EF/SF). Decomposition enables rearrangement, both providing the frame for defining new attributes, where several main ones are proposed and elaborated in the paper: fan diagram of EFs structural axes; R- or RQ-envelope, formed over positive and over negative peaks of ordered SFs; two forms of difference functions of positive and negative R/RQ-envelopes, as a measure of seismogram’s (a)symmetry, in respect to t-axis; distributions of SFs durations. Several others are in perspective. Analogy between R-envelope and seismogram’s spectrum is considered from the aspects of arranged elements, and asymptotic behavior of these two functional attributes. More objective definition of seismogram duration is proposed, determined by linear regression across the scatter plot of SFs peaks. R-envelope showed itself as an invariant in the seismogram population, and the distribution of SFs durations as well. Results are presented through extensive graphics, backed with mathematical description. Thorough discussion of the concept and results is given.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Earthquake Detection and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Priština in Kosovska Mitrovica, Knjaza Miloša 7, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Priština in Kosovska Mitrovica, Knjaza Miloša 7, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Dowrick, D. (2009). Earthquake Resistant Design and Risk Reduction, Wiley. [2nd ed.].10.1002/9780470747018 ↗
2. (2023, September 06). GFZ, Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, Seismic Hazard Assessment for the D-A-CH Countries. Available online: https://www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/section/seismic-hazard-and-risk-dynamics/projects/previous-projects/probabilistic-seismic-hazard-assessments/d-a-ch-seismic-hazard-for-the-d-a-ch-countries-germany-austria-switzerland.
3. (2023, October 07). A Matter of Development: How to Reduce Vulnerability in the Face of Natural Disasters, UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, March 2000. Available online: https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/11209/matter-development-how-reduce-vulnerability-face-natural-disasters.
4. Duggal, S.K. (2013). Earthquake-Resistant Design of Structures, Oxford University Press India. [2nd ed.]. Available online: https://www.technicalbookspdf.com/earthquake-resistant-design-of-structures-2nd-edition/.
5. (2023, September 02). FEMA Earthquake-Resistant Design Concepts, An Introduction to the NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA P-749/December 2010, Available online: https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_earthquake-resistant-design-concepts_p-749.pdf.
6. Sucuoğlu, H., and Akkar, S. (2014). Basic Earthquake Engineering-From Seismology to Analysis and Design, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-01026-7 ↗
7. Schubert, G. (2007). Treatise on Geophysics, Elsevier. [1st ed.]. Available online: https://www.geokniga.org/bookfiles/geokniga-treatise-geophysics.pdf.
8. Bormann, P. (2012). IASPEI New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences.
9. Lindup, G., Sharpe, R., Holm, S., Jarman, S., Sinclair, R., Bloomer, A., Tsamandakis, E., and Smart, C. (2019). Practice Note 19 Seismic Resistance of Pressure Equipment and Its Supports, Engineering New Zealand. Available online: https://d2rjvl4n5h2b61.cloudfront.net/media/documents/PN19-SeismicResistancePressureEquipment_V5-2019.pdf.
10. Babić, R., and Babić, L. (2023). A New Type of Bipartite Random Graph as a Transform of Seismogram and Its Potential for Organizing Seismic Databases. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131810303 ↗
11. Turhan Taner, M. (2023, September 25). Attributes Revisited, Rock Solid Images (RSI), Houston, Texas, May 2003. Available online: https://pdfslide.net/documents/attributes-revisited-rsi.html?page=2.
12. Subrahmanyam, D., and Rao, P.H. (2023, October 01). Seismic Attributes—A Review, 7th International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, Hyderabad 2008, P-398. Available online: https://spgindia.org/2008/398.pdf.
13. Seismic attributes—A historical perspective10.1190/1.2098670 ↗
14. Seismic Attributes and Their Applications in Seismic Geomorphology
15. Using seismic attributes in seismotectonic research: An application to the Norcia Mw = 6.5 earthquake (30 October 2016) in central Italy10.5194/se-11-329-2020 ↗
16. Kushwaha, P.K., Maurya, S., Rai, P., and Singh, N. (2021). Basics of Computational Geophysics, Elsevier.
17. Helal, A., Farag, K., and Shihata, M. (2023, September 20). Unconventional Seismic Interpretation Workflow to Enhance Seismic Attributes Results and Extract Geobodiesat Gulf of Mexico Case Study, Project: North Sea f3, January 2015. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316343080_UNCONVENTIONAL_SEISMIC_INTERPRETATION_WORKFLOW_TO_ENHANCE_SEISMIC_ATTRIBUTES_RESULTS_AND_EXTRACT_GEOBODIESAT_GULF_OF_MEXICO_CASE_STUDY/figures?lo=1.
18. Artificial intelligence in seismology: Advent, performance and future trends10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.004 ↗
19. Too Many Seismic Attributes?
20. Lee, J., and Green, T. (, January October). Predictive Relations for Significant Durations in Stable Continental Regions. Proceedings of the 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (14WCEE), Beijing, China. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266175405_PREDICTIVE_RELATIONS_FOR_SIGNIFICANT_DURATIONS_IN_STABLE_CONTINENTAL_REGIONS/figures?lo=1.
21. Lee, J. (2015, January 1–4). Strong Ground Motion Durations of Directivity Motions. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand. Available online: https://www.issmge.org/uploads/publications/59/60/174.00_Lee.pdf.
22. Empirical models for the prediction of ground motion duration for intraplate earthquakes10.1007/s10950-017-9648-2 ↗
23. Physically Parameterized Prediction Equations for Significant Duration in Active Crustal Regions10.1193/063015EQS106M ↗
24. Simplified approaches for Arias Intensity correction of synthetic accelerograms10.1007/s10518-017-0126-6 ↗
25. Mansukhani, S. (2023, October 09). The Hurst Exponent: Predictability of Time Series. Available online: https://pubsonline.informs.org/do/10.1287/LYTX.2012.04.05/full/.
26. Estimation of Hurst exponent of seismic signal10.30730/2541-8912.2017.1.2.050-061 ↗
27. Galluzzo, D., Manzo, R., La Rocca, M., Nardone, L., and Di Maio, R. (2023). Detection of Low Frequency Seismicity at Mt. Vesuvius Based on Coherence and Statistical Moments of Seismic Signals. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010194 ↗
28. (2023, October 07). Weisang. Available online: https://www.weisang.com/en/documentation/envelopeanalysis_en/#.
29. Scattering Behaviour at Merapi Volcano (Java) Revealed from an Active Seismic Experiment10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.01390.x ↗
30. Synthesis of Vector-Wave Envelopes in Random Elastic Media on the Basis of the Markov Approximation10.1016/S0065-2687(08)00003-4 ↗
31. Combined Effects of Deterministic and Statistical Structure on High-Frequency Regional Seismograms10.1093/gji/ggx219 ↗
32. (2023, October 07). KRSC Kola Regional Seismological Centre May 2018, Generalized Envelopes. Available online: https://www.krsc.ru/?q=en/Envelop.
33. (2023, September 20). PEER, PEER Ground Motion Database. Available online: https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/spectras/new?sourceDb_flag=1.
34. Havskov, J., and Ottemoller, L. (2023, September 23). Processing Earthquake Data. Available online: https://www.geo.uib.no/seismo/SOFTWARE/DOCUMENTATION/processing_earthquake_data.pdf.
35. Upadhyaya, S., and Yeganeh, S.M. (2015). Seasonal Adjustment of National Indices of Industrial Production at International Level, UNIDO.
36. The IASPEI Standard Seismic Phase List10.1785/gssrl.74.6.761 ↗
37. Sandwell, D., Anderson, D.L., and Wessel, P. (2023, October 07). Global tectonic maps, Special Paper 388, Geological Society of America. Available online: https://topex.ucsd.edu/sandwell/publications/108.pdf.
38. Anderson Don, L. (2007). New Theory of the Earth, Cambridge University Press. Available online: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK:2007.001.10.1017/CBO9781139167291 ↗
39. Pischiutta, M., Rovelli, A., Salvini, F., Fletcher, J.B., and Savage, M.K. (2023). Directional Amplification at Rock Sites in Fault Damage Zones. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13106060 ↗
40. Xiao, M., Xie, J., Wang, W., Liu, W., Sun, J., Jin, B., Zhang, T., Zhao, Y., and Wang, Y. (2023). Application of Iterative Virtual Events Internal Multiple Suppression Technique: A Case of Southwest Depression Area of Tarim, China. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13158832 ↗
41. Chelyabinsk: Portrait of an asteroid airburst10.1063/PT.3.2515 ↗
42. (2023, October 07). Space-Chelyabinsk. Available online: https://www.space.com/33623-chelyabinsk-meteor-wake-up-call-for-earth.html.
43. Peter Bormann, P., Wendt, S., and Di Giacomo, D. (2013). New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice (NMSOP-2), IASPEI, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences.
44. Seismic Characterization of the Chelyabinsk Meteor’s Terminal Explosion10.1785/0220130042 ↗
45. Seismoacoustic coupling induced by the breakup of the 15 February 2013 Chelyabinsk meteor10.1002/grl.50683 ↗
46. Malone, S. (2023, October 01). Seismology in the Air, PNSN. Available online: https://pnsn.org/blog/2018/03/22/seismology-in-the-air.
47. A meteor shockwave event recorded at seismic and infrasound stations in northern Taiwan10.1186/s40562-017-0079-2 ↗
48. Bolide Airbursts as a Seismic Source for the 2018 Mars InSight Mission10.1007/s11214-016-0327-3 ↗
49. Seismic detections of the 15 February 2013 Chelyabinsk meteor from the dense ChinArray10.1007/s11589-016-0159-y ↗
50. (2023, October 01). SAGE, Special Event: Chelyabinsk, Russia Bolide (Meteor), Last Updated: 2013-02-28. Available online: https://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/specialevents/2013/02/19/chelyabinsk-russia-bolide-meteor/.
51. Moshou, A., Konstantaras, A., Argyrakis, P., Petrakis, N.S., Kapetanakis, T.N., and Vardiambasis, I.O. (2022). Data Management and Processing in Seismology: An Application of Big Data Analysis for the Doublet Earthquake of 2021, 03 March, Elassona, Central Greece. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12157446 ↗
52. A novel technique for automatic seismic data processing using both integral and local feature of seismograms10.1007/s11589-014-0084-x ↗
53. Gerhard, D. (2023, October 07). Pitch Extraction and Fundamental Frequency: History and Current Techniques, Technical Report TR-CS 2003-06 November 2003. Available online: https://www.cs.uregina.ca/Research/Techreports/2003-06.pdf.
54. Brad Osgood, B. (2023, October 07). The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, Lecture Notes for EE 261, Electrical Engineering Department Stanford University. Available online: https://see.stanford.edu/materials/lsoftaee261/book-fall-07.pdf.
55. Babić, R. (2000). Signal Analysis I, Academic Mind.
56. New Aspect of Transition between Line and Continuous Spectrum and Its Relation to Seismic Influence on Structures
57. Frequent observations of identical onsets of large and small earthquakes10.1038/s41586-019-1508-5 ↗