Marginal Fit Evaluation of Zirconia Substructure Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) by Scanning Electron Microscope
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose. This in vitro study compared the vertical marginal discrepancy (MD) and absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) between the zirconia substructure and titanium (Ti)-base abutment before and after cementation. Material and methods. An intraoral scanner (CEREC Omnicam scanner; Dentsply Sirona) was used to scan the dental model of missing tooth 36 and obtain a three-dimensional virtual model. It was designed and milled for 25 zirconia superstructures (inCoris ZI meso F2 L, Dentsply Sirona). The samples were cemented to Ti bases. The MD and AMD were measured for each sample by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) before and after cementation. Results. The overall mean values of MD measurements before and after cementation were 14.12 μm and 20.28 μm, respectively. The overall mean values of AMD measurements prior to and after substructure cementation on the Ti base were 54.85 μm and 116.0 μm, respectively. ANOVA revealed significant differences in MD (p = 0.001) and AMD (p < 0.001) before and after cementation. Conclusions. Significant differences were observed in MD and AMD values before and after cementation. The MD and AMD values were significantly lower before cementation than after cementation. The mean MD and AMD values were clinically acceptable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Oral Rehabilitation. School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv P.O. Box 3904, Israel
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Al-Quran, F.A., Al-Ghalayini, R.F., and Al-Zu’bi, B.N. (2011). Single-tooth replacement: Factors affecting different prosthetic treatment modalities. BMC Oral Health, 11.10.1186/1472-6831-11-34 ↗
2. Evaluation of marginal fit of single implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns prepared by using presintered metal blocks10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.015 ↗
3. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4 ↗
4. Meirowitz, A., Bitterman, Y., Levy, S., Mijiritsky, E., and Dolev, E. (2019). An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center. BMC Oral Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0810-9 ↗
5. Hao, Y., Huang, X., Zhou, X., Li, M., Ren, B., Peng, X., and Cheng, L. (2018). Influence of dental prosthesis and restorative materials interface on oral biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19103157 ↗
6. Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model10.1902/jop.2010.100415 ↗
7. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00095.x ↗
8. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60047-0 ↗
9. In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in five ceramic restoration fabricating techniques
10. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60128-X ↗
11. CAD/CAM vs conventional technique for fabrication of implant-supported frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies10.11607/ijp.5616 ↗
12. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.002 ↗
13. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00103 ↗
14. CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.3 ↗
15. Abutment misfit in implant-supported prostheses manufactured by casting technique: An integrative review10.4103/ejd.ejd_162_17 ↗
16. Scaminaci Russo, D., Cinelli, F., Sarti, C., and Giachetti, L. (2019). Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Current Conditioning Methods and Bonding Materials. Dent. J., 7.10.3390/dj7030074 ↗
17. Titanium Base Abutments in Implant Prosthodontics: A Literature Review10.1055/s-0041-1735423 ↗
18. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: A scanning electron microscopy analysis10.11607/jomi.2759 ↗
19. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: A literature review10.1111/jopr.12006 ↗
20. Fracture load and marginal fit of shrinkage-free ZrSiO4 all-ceramic crowns after chewing simulation10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01637.x ↗
21. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems before and after cementation10.2341/11-012-L ↗
22. Marginal Fit Metal-Ceramic and In-Ceram Single Crown Cement retained in Implant-supported Abutments10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1965 ↗
23. Marginal accuracy of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses after in vitro stress simulation10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01593.x ↗
24. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708 ↗
25. Digital evaluation of absolute marginal discrepancy: A comparison of ceramic crowns fabricated with conventional and digital techniques10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.014 ↗
26. Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60009-7 ↗
27. Three-dimensional accuracy of CAD/CAM titanium and ceramic superstructures for implant abutments using spiral scan microtomography10.11607/ijp.3302 ↗
28. Clinical, technical, and radiologic outcomes of 182 implant-supported zirconia single crowns using titanium-base abutments: A retrospective study10.11607/ijp.7796 ↗
29. The influence of titanium base abutments on peri-implant soft tissue inflammatory parameters and marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial10.1111/cid.12900 ↗
30. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns10.11607/jomi.7431 ↗
31. Long-term effects of titanium-base abutments on peri-implant health: A 5-year randomised controlled trial
32. Titanium-base abutments may have similar long-term peri-implant effects as non-bonded one-piece abutments10.1038/s41432-022-0835-9 ↗
33. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60198-0 ↗
34. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.003 ↗
35. Digital Technologies for Restorative Dentistry10.1016/j.cden.2022.05.006 ↗
36. Marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM zirconia-based crown during fabrication steps10.1016/j.tdj.2014.12.002 ↗
37. Abutment on Titanium-Base Hybrid Implant: A Literature Review10.1055/s-0042-1750801 ↗
38. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns10.1016/0022-3913(91)90408-O ↗