journal article·2023-08-24Open access

Fuzzy Multivariate Regression Models for Seismic Assessment of Rocking Structures

Fani I. Gkountakou, Kosmas E. Bantilas, Ioannis E. Kavvadias, Anaxagoras Elenas, Basil K. Papadopoulos

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 17

Abstract

The assessment of rocking response is a challenging task due to its high nonlinearity. The present study investigates two methodologies to evaluate finite rocking rotations and overturn of three typical rocking systems. In particular, fuzzy linear regression (FLR) with triangular fuzzy numbers and a hybrid model combining logistic regression and fuzzy logic were adopted. To this end, three typical rocking structures were considered, and nonlinear time history analyses were performed to obtain their maximum response. Eighteen seismic intensity measures (IMs) extracted from recorded seismic accelerograms were considered to predict the responses. In the absence of rocking overturn, the finite rocking rotations and similarity ratios were calculated by adopting the FLR method. Moreover, extensive analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of each IM on the model’s predictions. On the other hand, rocking overturn was evaluated by logistic regression to compute the probability of collapse, followed by the FLR method to estimate the similarity between the different rocking-based structural systems. The root mean square error (RMSE) parameter and the log loss function were determined for every model to assess the predictions that emerged from the two fuzzy methods. As indicated, both methods demonstrated satisfactory results, presenting minimal deviations from the observed values. Finally, in the case of finite rocking rotation predictive models, remarkably high similarity ratios were observed among the various structures, with a median value of 0.96.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100 Xanthi, Greece

Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Structural Statics and Dynamics, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100 Xanthi, Greece

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. A half-century of rocking isolation10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1187 ↗
2. Rocking response of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:5(473) ↗
3. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes10.1785/BSSA0530020403 ↗
4. Large displacement behaviour of a structural model with foundation uplift under impulsive and earthquake excitations10.1002/eqe.229 ↗
5. The interaction of elasticity and rocking in flexible structures allowed to uplift10.1002/eqe.2181 ↗
6. An analytical model of a deformable cantilever structure rocking on a rigid surface: Development and verification10.1002/eqe.2608 ↗
7. Rocking isolation of low-rise frame structures founded on isolated footings10.1002/eqe.1182 ↗
8. Comparative assessment of two rocking isolation techniques for a motorway overpass bridge10.3389/fbuil.2017.00047 ↗
9. Planar rocking response and stability analysis of an array of free-standing columns capped with a freely supported rigid beam10.1002/eqe.2222 ↗
10. Seismic response analysis of the planar rocking frame10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000939 ↗
11. Seismic performance of rocking frames with flag-shaped hysteretic behavior10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001206 ↗
12. The dynamics of an elastic structure coupled with a rocking wall10.1002/eqe.2838 ↗
13. Seismic response of a yielding structure coupled with a rocking wall
14. Performance analysis of seismic-insulating kinematic foundations on support elements with negative stiffness10.1007/s11204-009-9052-1 ↗
15. Dynamics of rocking podium structures10.1002/eqe.2915 ↗
16. Bachmann, J.A., Jost, C., Studemann, Q., Vassiliou, M.F., and Stojadinović, B. (2016, January 5–10). An Analytical Model for the Dynamic Response of an Elastic SDOF System Fixed on Top of a Rocking Single-Storey Frame Structure: Experimental Validation. Proceedings of the 7th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Crete Island, Greece.10.7712/100016.2164.10112 ↗
17. New rocking column with control of negative stiffness displacement range and its application to RC frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110133 ↗
18. Seismic response of elastic multidegree of freedom oscillators placed on the top of rocking storey10.1002/eqe.3400 ↗
19. Analytical investigation of the seismic response of elastic oscillators placed on the top of rocking storey10.1007/s10518-020-01019-3 ↗
20. Finite element analysis of the seismic response of ancient columns10.1002/eqe.3207 ↗
21. Seismic response distribution expressions for rocking building contents under ordinary ground motions10.1007/s10518-022-01424-w ↗
22. Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes10.1002/eqe.4290080606 ↗
23. Efficiency of alternative intensity measures for the seismic assessment of monolithic free-standing columns10.1007/s10518-016-0035-0 ↗
24. Seismic response parametric study of ancient rocking columns10.1080/15583058.2017.1298009 ↗
25. Dimensionless fragility curves for rocking response to near-fault excitations10.1002/eqe.2571 ↗
26. Fragility and risk assessment of freestanding building contents10.1002/eqe.3276 ↗
27. Fragility curves and seismic demand hazard analysis of rocking walls restrained with elasto-plastic ties10.1002/eqe.3524 ↗
28. Seismic overturning fragility analysis for freestanding building contents subjected to horizontal bidirectional floor motions10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107414 ↗
29. Rocking spectrum intensity measures for seismic assessment of rocking rigid blocks10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.07.021 ↗
30. Is rocking motion predictable?10.1002/eqe.2978 ↗
31. Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning10.1177/8755293019878137 ↗
32. Physics-guided convolutional neural network (PhyCNN) for data-driven seismic response modeling10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110704 ↗
33. Damage prediction for regular reinforced concrete buildings using the decision tree algorithm10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.10.006 ↗
34. Seismic parameters’ combinations for the optimum prediction of the damage state of R/C buildings using neural networks10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.001 ↗
35. Hybrid data-driven hazard-consistent drift models for SMRF10.1002/eqe.3807 ↗
36. Interpretable machine learning models for the estimation of seismic drifts in CLT buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106365 ↗
37. Intelligent systems for structural damage assessment
38. Lazaridis, P.C., Kavvadias, I.E., Demertzis, K., Iliadis, L., and Vasiliadis, L.K. (2022). Structural Damage Prediction of a Reinforced Concrete Frame under Single and Multiple Seismic Events Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 12.10.20944/preprints202203.0188.v1 ↗
39. Lazaridis, P.C., Kavvadias, I.E., Demertzis, K., Iliadis, L., and Vasiliadis, L.K. (2023). Interpretable Machine Learning for Assessing the Cumulative Damage of a Reinforced Concrete Frame Induced by Seismic Sequences. Sustainability, 15.10.20944/preprints202305.0737.v1 ↗
40. Achmet, Z., Diamantopoulos, S., and Fragiadakis, M. (2023). Rapid seismic response prediction of rocking blocks using machine learning. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1–19.10.1007/s10518-023-01680-4 ↗
41. Multiple linear regression and fuzzy linear regression based assessment of postseismic structural damage indices
42. Classification of seismic damages in buildings using fuzzy logic procedures
43. Similarities in fuzzy regression models10.1023/A:1021784524897 ↗
44. Size versus slenderness: Two competing parameters in the seismic stability of free-standing rocking columns10.1785/0120150138 ↗
45. Experimental and analytical studies on the response of freestanding laboratory equipment to earthquake shaking10.1002/eqe.871 ↗
46. Meskouris, K. (2000). Structural Dynamics: Models, Methods, Examples, Ernst & Sohn.
47. Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:2(150) ↗
48. Kramer, S.L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall.
49. Rocking amplification and strong-motion duration10.1002/eqe.3058 ↗
50. Seismic intensity measures optimized for low-rise reinforced concrete frame structures10.1080/13632469.2021.1964650 ↗
51. Dimensional analysis of yielding and pounding structures for records without distinct pulses10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.02.006 ↗
52. Arias, A. (1970). A Measure of Earthquake Intensity, MIT Press.
53. Ang, A.H.S. (1990, January 20–24). Reliability bases for seismic safety assessment and design. Proceedings of the 4th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
54. A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures10.1016/S0267-7261(05)80002-8 ↗
55. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion
56. An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199701)26:1<79::AID-EQE624>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
57. A basic review of fuzzy logic applications in hydrology and water resources10.1007/s13201-020-01276-2 ↗
58. Fuzzy logic approach for seismic fragility analysis of RC frames with applications to earthquake-induced damage and construction quality10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.047 ↗
59. Fuzzy Regression Analysis with a proposed model
60. Optimization of cold-formed lipped C-section under bending using prediction equations as objective functions10.1186/s44147-022-00106-3 ↗
61. Prediction of new active cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic using multiple linear regression model10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.045 ↗
62. Decision Making for Hotel Selection using Rough Set Theory: A case study of Indian Hotels
63. Regression Analysis for Predicting Soil Strength in Bangladesh
64. Linear Regression Analysis with Fuzzy Model10.1109/TSMC.1982.4308925 ↗
65. The Use of Fuzzy Linear Regression with Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers to Predict the Compressive Strength of Lightweight Foamed Concrete10.18280/mmep.090101 ↗
66. Sultan, A., Sałabun, W., Faizi, S., and Ismail, M. (2021). Hesitant Fuzzy linear regression model for decision making. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13101846 ↗
67. Similarities and distances in fuzzy regression modeling10.1007/s00500-003-0314-y ↗
68. Fuzzy linear regression models with fuzzy entropy
69. Fuzzy Data Analysis by Possibilistic Linear Models10.1016/0165-0114(87)90033-9 ↗
70. Possibilistic linear systems and their application to the linear regression model10.1016/0165-0114(88)90054-1 ↗
71. Gkountakou, F., and Papadopoulos, B. (2020). The use of fuzzy linear regression and ANFIS methods to predict the compressive strength of cement. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12081295 ↗
72. Understanding logistic regression analysis10.11613/BM.2014.003 ↗
73. Fritz, M., and Berger, P.D. (2015). Improving the User Experience through Practical Data Analytics: Gain Meaningful Insight and Increase Your Bottom Line, Morgan Kaufmann.10.1016/B978-0-12-800635-1.09001-7 ↗
74. Exploring physical wetland vulnerability of Atreyee river basin in India and Bangladesh using logistic regression and fuzzy logic approaches10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.009 ↗
75. Logistic regression: A brief primer10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01185.x ↗
76. An Integrated approach for fuzzy logistic regression
77. Zou, X., Hu, Y., Tian, Z., and Shen, K. (2019, January 19–20). Logistic regression model optimization and case analysis. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT), Dalian, China.10.1109/ICCSNT47585.2019.8962457 ↗
78. Traffic management using logistic regression with fuzzy logic10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.159 ↗
79. GIS-based gully erosion susceptibility evaluation using frequency ratio, cosine amplitude and logistic regression ensembled with fuzzy logic in Hinglo River Basin, India
80. Fuzzy logistic regression based on the least squares approach with application in clinical studies10.1016/j.camwa.2011.08.050 ↗
81. The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: Key components and results10.1007/s10518-015-9795-1 ↗