Show source-provided references
3. Swine models, genomic tools and services to enhance our understanding of human health and diseases
10.1038/laban.1215 ↗7. Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning
10.1038/ng1973 ↗10. Advances in porcine genomics and proteomicsc-a toolbox for developing the pig as a model organism for molecular biomedical research
10.1093/bfgp/elq004 ↗12. Advancing swine models for human health and diseases
20. Kurome, M., Geistlinger, L., Kessler, B., Zakhartchenko, V., Klymiuk, N., Wuensch, A., Richter, A., Baehr, A., Kraehe, K., and Burkhardt, K. (2013). Factors influencing the efficiency of generating genetically engineered pigs by nuclear transfer: Multi-factorial analysis of a large data set. BMC Biotechnol., 13.
10.1186/1472-6750-13-43 ↗21. Swindle, M.M. (2009, January 5–9). Swine as Surgical Models in Biomedical Research. Proceedings of the 2009 ACVP/ASVCP Annual Meetings, Monterey, CA, USA.
25. DNA methylation landscapes: Provocative insights from epigenomics
10.1038/nrg2341 ↗27. Genomic analyses identify distinct patterns of selection in domesticated pigs and Tibetan wild boars
10.1038/ng.2811 ↗29. Bioinformatics, B. (2022, March 12). Trim Galore!. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/.
31. (2022, March 09). National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI BioProject, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/.
33. Bioinformatics, B. (2022, May 27). Bismark. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/bismark/.
37. Srirattana, K., Kaneda, M., and Parnpai, R. (2022). Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.
10.3390/ijms23041969 ↗38. TDG is a pig-specific epigenetic regulator with insensitivity to H3K9 and H3K27 demethylation in nuclear transfer embryos
10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.09.012 ↗41. Application of interspecific Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (iSCNT) in sturgeons and an unexpectedly produced gynogenetic sterlet with homozygous quadruple haploid
10.1038/s41598-018-24376-1 ↗42. Schachtschneider, K.M., Madsen, O., Park, C., Rund, L.A., Groenen, M.A.M., and Schook, L.B. (2015). Adult porcine genome-wide DNA methylation patterns support pigs as a biomedical model. BMC Genom., 16.
10.1186/s12864-015-1938-x ↗43. Ziller, M.J., Müller, F., Liao, J., Zhang, Y., Gu, H., Bock, C., Boyle, P., Epstein, C.B., Bernstein, B.E., and Lengauer, T. (2011). Genomic Distribution and Inter-Sample Variation of Non-CpG Methylation across Human Cell Types. PLoS Genet., 7.
10.1371/journal.pgen.1002389 ↗44. Shirane, K., Toh, H., Kobayashi, H., Miura, F., Chiba, H., Ito, T., Kono, T., and Sasaki, H. (2013). Mouse Oocyte Methylomes at Base Resolution Reveal Genome-Wide Accumulation of Non-CpG Methylation and Role of DNA Methyltransferases. PLoS Genet., 9.
10.1371/journal.pgen.1003439 ↗45. Developmentally linked human DNA hypermethylation is associated with down-modulation, repression, and upregulation of transcription
10.1080/15592294.2018.1445900 ↗46. Differential DNA methylation and gene expression in reciprocal hybrids between Solanum lycopersicum and S. pimpinellifolium
10.1093/dnares/dsx028 ↗48. The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores
10.1038/ng.298 ↗49. Genome-wide DNA methylation profile of prepubertal porcine testis
10.1071/RD17067 ↗50. Profiling the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern of porcine ovaries using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing
10.1038/srep22138 ↗