Optimized Unconventional Geometric Gates in Superconducting Circuits
Source abstract
Abstract
Nonadiabatic Abelian geometric quantum computation has been extensively studied, due to its fast manipulation and inherent noise resistance. However, to obtain the pure geometric phase, the quantum state is required to evolve along some special paths to eliminate the dynamical phase. This leads to increasing evolution time and weakened gate robustness. The unconventional geometric quantum computation is an effective way to solve the above problems. Here, we propose a general approach to realize the unconventional geometric computation. Then, we discuss the effect of the ratio of geometric phase to dynamic phase on the performance of quantum gates. The results show that the selection of ratio corresponds to different quantum gate robustness. Therefore, we can optimize the ratio to get higher-fidelity quantum gates. At last, we construct the ratio-optimized quantum gates in a superconducting circuit and test its robustness. The fidelities of the T-gate, Hadamard H-gate, and controlled phase gate can be obtained as 99.98%, 99.95%, and 99.85%, respectively. Therefore, our scheme provides a promising way to realize large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computation in superconducting circuits.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Engineering and Quantum Materials, School of Physics and Telecommunication Engineering, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong province
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer10.1137/S0097539795293172 ↗
2. Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.325 ↗
3. Almost Any Quantum Logic Gate is Universal10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.346 ↗
4. Elementary gates for quantum computation10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3457 ↗
5. Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes
6. Holonomy, the Quantum Adiabatic Theorem, and Berry’s Phase10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.2167 ↗
7. Geometric quantum computation using nuclear magnetic resonance10.1038/35002528 ↗
8. Geometric phase gates with adiabatic control in electron spin resonance10.1103/PhysRevA.87.032326 ↗
9. Experimental Realization of Robust Geometric Quantum Gates with Solid-State Spins10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.010503 ↗
10. Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1593 ↗
11. Implementation of Universal Quantum Gates Based on Nonadiabatic Geometric Phases10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.097902 ↗
12. Rydberg-atom-based scheme of nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation10.1103/PhysRevA.96.052316 ↗
13. Plug-and-Play Approach to Nonadiabatic Geometric Quantum Gates10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.100501 ↗
14. Universal nonadiabatic geometric gates protected by dynamical decoupling10.1103/PhysRevA.102.032627 ↗
15. Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate10.1038/nature01492 ↗
16. Experimental Realization of Nonadiabatic Holonomic Single-Qubit Quantum Gates with Optimal Control in a Trapped Ion10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.054062 ↗
17. Experimental realization of nonadiabatic holonomic single-qubit quantum gates with two dark paths in a trapped ion10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.031 ↗
18. Non-adiabatic non-abelian geometric phase10.1016/0375-9601(88)91010-9 ↗
19. Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation
20. Nonadiabatic Holonomic Quantum Computation in Decoherence-Free Subspaces10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.170501 ↗
21. Experimental Realization of Nonadiabatic Shortcut to Non-Abelian Geometric Gates10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080501 ↗
22. Experimental Realization of Nonadiabatic Holonomic Quantum Computation10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.190501 ↗
23. Dynamical-decoupling-protected nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation10.1103/PhysRevA.103.012205 ↗
24. Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation using a single-loop scenario10.1103/PhysRevA.71.014302 ↗
25. Composite pulses in NMR as nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates10.1103/PhysRevA.80.024302 ↗
26. Robustness of single-qubit geometric gate against systematic error10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042335 ↗
27. Unconventional Geometric Quantum Computation10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.187902 ↗
28. Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces based on unconventional geometric phases10.1103/PhysRevA.94.062327 ↗
29. Approach to realizing nonadiabatic geometric gates with prescribed evolution paths10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023295 ↗
30. General approach for constructing Hamiltonians for nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation10.1103/PhysRevA.101.062306 ↗
31. Andersson, O. (2019). Holonomy in Quantum Information Geometry. arXiv.
32. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups10.1007/BF01608499 ↗
33. Noncyclic Geometric Quantum Gates with Smooth Paths via Invariant-Based Shortcuts10.1002/qute.202100019 ↗
34. Complete Characterization of a Quantum Process: The Two-Bit Quantum Gate10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.390 ↗
35. Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation with shortened path on superconducting circuits10.1063/5.0071569 ↗
36. Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance10.1038/nature13171 ↗
37. A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits10.1063/1.5089550 ↗
38. The experimental realization of high-fidelity ‘shortcut-to-adiabaticity’ quantum gates in a superconducting Xmon qubit10.1088/1367-2630/aac9e7 ↗
39. Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605 ↗
40. Realization of Superadiabatic Two-Qubit Gates Using Parametric Modulation in Superconducting Circuits10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.064012 ↗