Deep Machine Learning for Path Length Characterization Using Acoustic Diffraction
Source abstract
Abstract
Many fields now perform non-destructive testing using acoustic signals for the detection of objects or features of interest. This detection requires the decision of an experienced technician, which varies from technician to technician. This evaluation becomes even more challenging as the object decreases in size. In this paper, we assess the use of both traditional signal-processing machine learning algorithms, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), as well as Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures to approximate acoustic anomalies with an eye toward micro-scale applications such as application to biofilms. The probing signal is generated using a continuous sound wave emitted at controlled frequencies of 1 and 5 MHz through metallic specimens of varying heights each containing an anomaly in the form of a hole. Data are collected as the transmitted signal is sampled at several locations as the wave travels through the specimen. We have developed both a CNN and an LSTM architecture for frequency-domain feature detection and approximation. The CNN models, one for phase and one for amplitude data, take short-distance Fourier transforms (SDFTs) representing the change in the signal over multiple observation points as input. The LSTM model takes the change in phase or amplitude points at each lateral location as a comma-separated value (CSV) input. The models analyze the frequency and spatial changes experienced by each specimen and produce an estimation of the acoustic path length of the anomaly in radians. The models are evaluated using mean-square error and the R-square statistic. All models perform with a fairly high R-square score, the amplitude CNN and LSTM models achieving upwards of a 99% fit and the phase CNN achieving a 97% fit on average for the predicted values. With the performance of these models, we demonstrate that utilizing the transfer function phase and amplitude data to analyze acoustic diffraction patterns leads to the ability to extract, with great precision, features in the input signal that describe the nature of the anomaly.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, Bay St. Louis, MS 39529, USA
Department of Chemistry and Physics, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA 70402, USA
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Graff, K.F. (1975). Wave Motion in Elastic Solids, Oxford University Press.
2. Krautkrämer, J., and Krautkrämer, H. (1990). Ultrasonic Testing of Materials, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-10680-8 ↗
3. Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: A review10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.03.006 ↗
4. Ultrasonic Testing for Mechanical Engineering Domain: Present and Future Perspective
5. Kundu, T. (2012). Ultrasonic and Electromagnetic NDE for Structure and Material Characterization, CRC Press. [1st ed.]. Chapter 11.
6. Biofilms 2003: Emerging Themes and Challenges in Studies of Surface-Associated Microbial Life10.1128/JB.186.14.4427-4440.2004 ↗
7. Microbial biofilm: Current challenges in health care industry
8. Overview of Recent Advancement in Ultrasonic Imaging for Biomedical Applications10.2174/1874440001812010133 ↗
9. Deep Machine Learning for Acoustic Inspection of Metallic Medium10.3390/vibration5030030 ↗
10. Acoustic microscopy of living cells10.1073/pnas.78.3.1656 ↗
11. Biofilm Surface Density Determines Biocide Effectiveness10.3389/fmicb.2017.02443 ↗
12. Bacterial Density and Biofilm Structure Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography10.1038/s41598-019-46196-7 ↗
13. Acoustic and electrical property changes due to microbial growth and biofilm formation in porous media10.1029/2009JG001143 ↗
14. Detection and quantification of bacterial biofilms combining high-frequency acoustic microscopy and targeted lipid microparticles10.1186/1477-3155-12-24 ↗
15. Miura, K. (2016). Application of scanning acoustic microscopy to pathological diagnosis. Microsc. Anal., 381–403.10.5772/63405 ↗
16. Yoshida, S. (2017). Waves: Fundamentals and Dynamics, IOP Science.10.1088/978-1-6817-4573-2 ↗
17. Acoustic shadowing due to refractive and reflective effects10.2214/ajr.132.6.973 ↗
18. Guenther, B.D., and Steel, D. (2018). Encyclopedia of Modern Optics, Academic Press.
19. Examination of the two-dimensional pupil function in coherent scanning microscopes using spherical particles10.1121/1.423268 ↗
20. Soskind, Y.G. (2011). Field Guide to Diffractive Optics, SPIE.10.1117/3.895041 ↗
21. X-ray Coherent diffraction interpreted through the fractional Fourier transform10.1140/epjb/e2011-20123-1 ↗
22. Smith, D.G. (2013). Field Guide to Physical Optics, SPIE.10.1117/3.883971 ↗
23. Goodman, J.W. (2005). McGraw-Hill Physical and Quantum Electronics Series, Roberts & Company Publishers.
24. O’Shea, K., and Nash, R. (2015). An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv.
25. Sharma, A., and Kumar, D. (2020). Classification with 2-D Convolutional Neural Networks for breast cancer diagnosis. arXiv.
26. Conceptual understanding of convolutional neural network-a deep learning approach10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.069 ↗
27. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
28. Adaptive Subgradient Methods for Online Learning and Stochastic Optimization
29. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., and Swersky, K. (2023, February 04). Neural Networks for Machine Learning Lecture 6a Overview of Mini-Batch Gradient Descent. College of Computer Science, University of Toronto. Available online: https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~bonner/courses/2016s/csc321/lectures/lec6.pdf.
30. Recurrent neural networks
31. Graves, A. (2012). Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks, Springer. Studies in Computational Intelligence.10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2 ↗