journal article·2022-12-29Open access

Non-Linear Regression Model for Estimating the Efficiency of Heavy Metals Removal by Soil Washing with Chitosan Solution

Valer Micle, Gianina Elena Damian, George Calin Rogozan, Ioana Monica Sur

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 1

Abstract

The process of heavy metals removal by soil washing using chitosan as washing agent is a multivariate problem. According to the experimental data sets obtained during experiments performed at laboratory scale, the main parameters that influenced the efficiency of the soil washing process were the stirring time of the polluted soil with the investigated washing agent, washing solution concentration, and solid/liquid ratio (S/L ratio). This study explores the statistical relationships between the removal efficiency of Cu and Pb from polluted soil by washing with chitosan and factors influencing the soil washing process by use of a non-linear regression model. The non-linear regression model contains a non-linear component and a component of interaction among the two parameters (S/L ratio “X1”, the stirring time “X2”) which influences the efficiency of the Cu and Pb removal from soil by soil washing with the investigated washing agent. The proposed model is useful for predicting and estimating the effectiveness of the soil decontamination process by washing with chitosan. A comparison between the data calculated using the proposed mathematical model and the experimental data was also performed in order to determine the integrity and conformity of the mathematical model obtained. The results showed a good fit of the obtained model to the experimental data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heavy metals in environment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Environment Engineering and Entrepreneurship of Sustainable Development, Faculty of Materials and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Avenue, 400 641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Department of Cadastre, Civil and Environmental Engineering, “1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, 510 009 Alba Iulia, Romania

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Strawn, D.G. (2021). Sorption Mechanisms of Chemicals in Soils. Soil Syst., 5.10.3390/soilsystems5010013 ↗
2. Removal of heavy metal by screening followed by soil washing from contaminated soil
3. Humic substances-enhanced electroremediation of heavy metals contaminated soil10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.038 ↗
4. Washing as a remediation technology applicable in soils heavily polluted by mining metallurgical activities10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.10.015 ↗
5. Assessment of the influence of copper and zinc on the microstructural parameters and hydraulic conductivity of bentonites on the basis of SEM tests10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02142 ↗
6. Wu, S., Li, R., Peng, S., Liu, Q., and Zhu, X. (2017). Effect of humic acid on transformation of soil heavy metals. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing.10.1088/1757-899X/207/1/012089 ↗
7. Effect of heavy metals on soil microbial community and mung beans seed germination
8. Fractionation and bioavailability of Pb in municipal solid waste compost and Pb uptake by rice straw and grain under submerged condition in amended soil10.1007/s12303-008-0006-9 ↗
9. Angelaki, A., Dionysidis, A., Sihag, P., and Golia, E.E. (2022). Assessment of Contamination Management Caused by Copper and Zinc Cations Leaching and Their Impact on the Hydraulic Properties of a Sandy and a Loamy Clay Soil. Land, 11.10.3390/land11020290 ↗
10. Chromium removal from Polluted Water and its influence on biochemical and physiological parameters in algal cells used for phytoremediation10.24193/subbchem.2017.3.19 ↗
11. Solubility of Heavy Metals/Metalloid on Multi-Metal Contaminated Soil Samples from a Gold Ore Processing Area: Effects of Humic Substances10.1590/18069657rbcs20150383 ↗
12. Using Risk Assessment and Management Approaches to Develop Cost-Effective and Sustainable Mine Waste Management Strategies10.3390/recycling1030328 ↗
13. Simultaneous removal of multiple heavy metals from soil by washing with citric acid and ferric chloride10.1039/C9RA09999A ↗
14. Zheng, X.-J., Li, Q., Peng, H., Zhang, J.-X., Chen, W.-J., Zhou, B.-C., and Chen, M. (2022). Remediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils with SoilWashing: A Review. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142013058 ↗
15. Abandoned mine sites as a source of contamination by heavy metals: A case study in a semi-arid zone10.1016/j.gexplo.2007.04.011 ↗
16. Remediation of a Heavy Metals Contaminated Site with a Botanical Garden: Monitoring Results of the Application of an Advanced S/S Technique
17. Contribution of heavy metals to toxicity of coal combustion related fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Caenorhabditis elegans with wild-type or susceptible genetic background10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.028 ↗
18. Comparative Evaluation of Metal Phytoremediation Potential of Trees, Grasses, and Flowering Plants from Tannery-Wastewater-Contaminated Soil in Relation with Physicochemical Properties10.1080/15320383.2013.770437 ↗
19. Evaluation of soil properties, irrigation and solid waste application levels on Cu and Zn uptake by industrial hemp
20. Comparison of Natural Humic Substances and Synthetic Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid and Nitrilotriacetic Acid as Washing Agents of a Heavy Metal–Polluted Soil10.2134/jeq2009.0292 ↗
21. The use of chelating agents in the remediation of metal-contaminated soils: A review10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.015 ↗
22. Novel and Eco-Friendly Washing Agents to Remove Heavy Metals from Soil by Soil Washing
23. Kim, M.-S., Koo, N., Kim, J.-G., and Lee, S.-H. (2021). Effects of Washing Solution, Washing Time, and Solid-Solution Rate on the Maximum Heavy Metals Removal Efficiency. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11146398 ↗
24. Humic substances as a washing agent for Cd-contaminated soils10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.127 ↗
25. Investigating the use of synthetic humic-like acid as a soil washing treatment for metal contaminated soil10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.457 ↗
26. Gusiatin, Z.M., Kulikowsk, D., and Klik, B. (2020). New-GenerationWashing Agents in Remediation of Metal-Polluted Soils and Methods for Washing efuent Treatment: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17176220 ↗
27. Soil Washing Technology for Removing Heavy Metals from a Contaminated Soil: A Case Study10.15244/pjoes/104655 ↗
28. Efficiency of Washing Techniques for Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Sludge
29. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan from Shrimp shell waste
30. Kamari, A., Pulford, I.D., and Hargreaves, J.S.J. (2010, January 19–23). Chitosan-assisted Phytoextraction of Heavy Metal from Lead/Zinc Tailings Using Lolium Perenne—A Preliminary Study. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment, Gdańsk, Poland.
31. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: A comprehensive and critical review10.1038/s41545-021-00127-0 ↗
32. Machine learning for the prediction of heavy metal removal by chitosan-based flocculants10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119240 ↗
33. Flocculation of different types of combined contaminants of antibiotics and heavy metals by thermo-responsive flocculants with various architectures10.1016/j.seppur.2019.04.068 ↗
34. Heavy metal removal from wastewater using various adsorbents: A review10.2166/wrd.2016.104 ↗
35. Cadmium and Copper Removal From Aqueous Solutions Using Chitosan-Coated Gasifier Biochar10.3389/fenvs.2020.541203 ↗
36. Copper adsorption through chitosan immobilized on sand to demonstrate the feasibility for in situ soil decontamination10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.09.009 ↗
37. A comparative investigation on removal performances of commercial activated carbon, chitosan biosorbent and chitosan/activated carbon composite for cadmium10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.057 ↗
38. Removal of heavy metal from contaminated soil with chelating agents10.4236/ojss.2011.12010 ↗
39. Laboratory Investigation of Heavy Metal Removal by Soil Washing10.1080/10473289.1996.10467512 ↗
40. Multiple linear regression analysis for prediction of boiler losses and boiler efficiency
41. Damian, G.E., Micle, V., and Sur, I.M. (2021). Study regarding the pedological properties of the soil in the “Larga de Sus” mining area in order to establish the appropriate soil remediation technology. Pangeea, 52–61.
42. Mobilisation of Cu and Pb from multi-metal contaminated soils by dissolved humic substances extracted from Leonardite and factors affecting the process10.1007/s11368-019-02291-w ↗
43. Heavy metals removal by bioleaching using Thiobacillus ferrooxidans
44. Rogozan, G.C. (2013). Contributions Related to the Use of Mathematical Modeling to Emphasize Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Soil and Drawing Vulnerability Maps. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca]. (In Romanian).
45. Taloi, D. (1987). Optimization of Technological Processes, Academia Publishing House.
46. Optimized EDTA washing procedure to decontaminate heavymetals from soils in iron and steel works sites10.14233/ajchem.2013.12229 ↗
47. Comparison of artificial neural network and regression pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity10.1016/j.still.2005.08.011 ↗
48. Estimating the water retention curve from soil properties: Comparison of linear, nonlinear and concomitant variable methods10.1016/j.still.2004.07.003 ↗
49. Feasibility of using humic substances from compost to remove heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) from contaminated soil aged for different periods of time10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.08.022 ↗
50. Humic substances from sewage sludge compost as washing agent e_ectively remove Cu and Cd from soil10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.083 ↗
51. A laboratory test of NOM-assisted remediation of arsenic and copper contaminated soils10.1016/j.jece.2015.04.029 ↗
52. Remediation of lead-contaminated soil using dissolved organic carbon solutions prepared by wine-processing waste sludge10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.07.004 ↗