A Citizen-Sensing System for Measuring Urban Environmental Quality: A Case Study Carried out in Taiwan
Source abstract
Abstract
Urban planning is usually dependent on urban analysis and tends to use data from sensor networks collected over a long period time. However, in recent years, due to increased urbanization and the rapid growth of transport, a gap has developed between urban environments and citizen feelings. Rebuilding urban infrastructure or making urban planning changes require a lot of time and resource costs. The hardware in a city cannot be easily changed, but citizen activities change all the time. Distributing city space according to a software-based recommendation, such as arranging different locations for citizen activities or traffic, is a method that can be implemented to improve city environments and to avoid resource waste. In this paper, citizens were used as sensors to extract environmental information collected using a social network service (SNS), and the information was analyzed to turn subjective feelings into objective environmental phenomena. The research focused on how to collect citizens’ feelings regarding urban environments and to develop a citizen-sensing system to bridge the gap between citizen feelings and sensor networks. The results prove that citizens who sense the city environment create small-sized data that are suitable for small-scaled, high-density cities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architecture, Collage of Planning and Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
Funding
Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Hamilton, E. (2015, January 28). Tools and Methods for Global Urban Analysis. Proceedings of the European Commission Joint Research Centre 1st Urbanization Workshop, Luxembourg.
2. Collective sensing: Integrating geospatial technologies to understand urban systems—An overview10.3390/rs3081743 ↗
3. Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city10.1068/d16812 ↗
4. PortoLivingLab: An IoT-based sensing platform for smart cities10.1109/JIOT.2018.2791522 ↗
5. Dutta, J., Chowdhury, C., Roy, S., Middya, A.I., and Gazi, F. (2017, January 5–7). Towards smart city: Sensing air quality in city based on opportunistic crowd-sensing. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, Hyderabad, India.10.1145/3007748.3018286 ↗
6. Crowdsourcing-based application to solve the problem of insufficient training data in deep learning-based classification of satellite images10.1080/10106049.2021.1917006 ↗
7. Lynch, K. (1964). The Image of the City, MIT Press.
8. Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy City: Transforming Our Lives through Urban Design, Penguin UK.
9. Sui, D., Goodchild, M., and Elwood, S. (2013). Volunteered geographic information, the exaflood, and the growing digital divide. Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2 ↗
10. Creating smart buildings and cities10.1109/MPRV.2017.23 ↗
11. Making air (quality) visible: Exploiting new technology to dramatically improve atmospheric monitoring10.1109/MPRV.2018.03367741 ↗
12. Involving people in the building up of smart and sustainable cities: How to influence commuters’ behaviors through a mobile app game10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.021 ↗
13. Crowdsourcing in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions10.1109/MGRS.2020.2975132 ↗
14. Evolving planning systems in Madrid, Rome, and Athens10.1007/BF00189030 ↗
15. Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9 ↗
16. Wiggins, A., and Crowston, K. (2011, January 4–7). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.2011.207 ↗
17. Offenhuber, D., and Ratti, C. (2014). Decoding the city. Decoding the City, Birkhäuser.10.1515/9783038213925 ↗
18. Mit Senseable City Lab (2017, October 01). Senseable City Project. MIT Senseable City Lab. Available online: https://senseable.mit.edu/.
19. Shepard, M. (2011). Sentient City: Ubiquitous Computing, Architecture, and the Future of Urban Space, The MIT Press.
20. Evaluating the services and facilities of European cities using crowdsourced place data10.1177/0265813516686070 ↗
21. Urban thermal risk reduction: Developing and implementing spatially explicit services for resilient cities10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.006 ↗
22. A greener urban environment: Designing green infrastructure interventions to promote citizens’ subjective wellbeing10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103618 ↗
23. Incorporating social media in travel and activity choice models: Conceptual framework and exploratory analysis10.1080/12265934.2017.1331749 ↗
24. Cranshaw, J., Toch, E., Hong, J., Kittur, A., and Sadeh, N. (2010, January 26–29). Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/1864349.1864380 ↗
25. Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: A case study of Syracuse, NY10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.012 ↗
26. Berntzen, L., Johannessen, M.R., and Florea, A. (2016, January 26–30). Sensors and the smart city: Creating a research design for sensor-based smart city projects. Proceedings of the ThinkMind//SMART 2016, The Fifth International Conference on Smart Cities, Systems, Devices and Technologies, Porto, Portugal.
27. Using open access observational data for conservation action: A case study for birds10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.031 ↗
28. Insights into human-wildlife interactions in cities from bird sightings recorded online10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103742 ↗
29. Hsu, Y.-C., Dille, P., Cross, J., Dias, B., Sargent, R., and Nourbakhsh, I. (2017, January 6–11). Community-empowered air quality monitoring system. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, USA.10.1145/3025453.3025853 ↗