journal article·2022-10-20Open access

Quantifying Privacy Risks for Continuous Trait Data

Muqing He, Deqing Zou, Weizhong Qiang, Shouhuai Xu, Wenbo Wu, Hai Jin

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 20

Abstract

In the context of life sciences, the rapid biotechnical development leads to the creation of huge amounts of biological data. The use of such data naturally brings concerns on human genetic privacy breaches, which also discourage biological data sharing. Prior studies have investigated the possibility of the privacy issues associated with individuals’ trait data. However, there are few studies on quantitatively analyzing the probability of the privacy risk. In this paper, we fill this void by proposing a scheme for systematically breaching genomic privacy, which is centered on quantifying the probability of the privacy risk of continuous trait data. With well-designed synthetic datasets, our theoretical analysis and experiments lead to several important findings, such as: (i) The size of genetic signatures and the sensitivity (true positive rate) significantly affect the accuracy of re-identification attack. (ii) Both the size of genetic signatures and the minor allele frequency have a significant impact on distinguishing true positive and false positive matching between traits and genetic profiles. (iii) The size of the matching quantitative trait locus dataset has a large impact on the confidence of the privacy risk assessment. Validation with a real dataset shows that our findings can effectively estimate the privacy risks of the continuous trait dataset.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Genetic Associations and Epidemiology · Forensic and Genetic Research · Ethics in Clinical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Engineering Research Center for Big Data Technology and System, Services Computing Technology and System Lab, Hubei Key Laboratory of Distributed System Security, Hubei Engineering Research Center on Big Data Security, School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA

College of Business, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA

National Engineering Research Center for Big Data Technology and System, Services Computing Technology and System Lab, Cluster and Grid Computing Lab, School of Computer Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. The International HapMap Consortium (2003). The international HapMap project. Nature, 426, 789.10.1038/nature02168 ↗
2. Publisher Correction: Amplification-free single-cell whole-genome sequencing gets a makeover10.1038/s41592-020-0739-6 ↗
3. Genomic analysis in the age of human genome sequencing10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.032 ↗
4. Single-cell genome sequencing: Current state of the science10.1038/nrg.2015.16 ↗
5. Bush, W.S., and Moore, J.H. (2012). Genome-wide association studies. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002822 ↗
6. Overview of available methods for diverse RNA-Seq data analyses10.1007/s11427-011-4255-x ↗
7. (2020, January 01). Genome-Wide Association Studies. Available online: https://www.mgi-tech.com/applications/info/8/.
8. (2020, January 01). 23 and Me Research Innovation Collaborations Program. Available online: https://research.23andme.com/research-innovation-collaborations/.
9. GWAS identifies a common breast cancer risk allele among BRCA1 carriers10.1038/ng1010-819 ↗
10. From candidate gene studies to GWAS and post-GWAS analyses in breast cancer10.1016/j.gde.2015.01.004 ↗
11. Imputing DNA Methylation by Transferred Learning Based Neural Network10.1007/s11390-021-1174-6 ↗
12. Error exponent for concatenated codes in DNA data storage under substitution errors10.1007/s11432-021-3394-2 ↗
13. Correlated genotypes in friendship networks10.1073/pnas.1011687108 ↗
14. Humbert, M., Ayday, E., Hubaux, J.P., and Telenti, A. (2013, January 4–8). Addressing the concerns of the lacks family: Quantification of kin genomic privacy. Proceedings of the ACM Sigsac Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Berlin, Germany.10.1145/2508859.2516707 ↗
15. (2018, January 01). DNA Profiles from Ancestry Websites Helped Identify the Golden State Killer Suspect. Available online: https://www.vox.com/2018/4/27/17290288/golden-state-killer-joseph-james-deangelo-dna-profile-match.
16. Greshake, B., Bayer, P.E., Rausch, H., and Reda, J. (2014). openSNP—A crowdsourced web resource for personal genomics. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0089204 ↗
17. Harvard Personal Genome Project: Lessons from participatory public research10.1186/gm527 ↗
18. Complying with HIPAA: A guide for the university and its counsel
19. (2021, January 01). GenomePrivacy. Available online: https://genomeprivacy.org/.
20. Bayesian method to predict individual SNP genotypes from gene expression data10.1038/ng.2248 ↗
21. Backes, M., Berrang, P., Bieg, M., Eils, R., Herrmann, C., Humbert, M., and Lehmann, I. (2017, January 22–26). Identifying personal DNA methylation profiles by genotype inference. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Jose, CA, USA.10.1109/SP.2017.21 ↗
22. Facial recognition from DNA using face-to-DNA classifiers10.1038/s41467-019-10617-y ↗
23. Identification of individuals by trait prediction using whole-genome sequencing data10.1073/pnas.1711125114 ↗
24. An introduction to factor analysis of information risk (fair)
25. SNP genotyping: Technologies and biomedical applications10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.152037 ↗
26. Johnson, A.D., and O’Donnell, C.J. (2009). An Open Access Database of Genome-wide Association Results. BMC Med. Genet., 10.10.1186/1471-2350-10-6 ↗
27. Liu, B.H. (2017). Statistical Genomics: Linkage, Mapping, and QTL Analysis, CRC Press.10.1201/9780203738658 ↗
28. Pharmacological enrichment of polygenic risk for precision medicine in complex disorders10.1038/s41598-020-57795-0 ↗
29. An xQTL map integrates the genetic architecture of the human brain’s transcriptome and epigenome10.1038/nn.4632 ↗
30. Gillespie, J.H. (2004). Population Genetics: A Concise Guide, JHU Press.10.56021/9780801880087 ↗
31. Ultrarare variants drive substantial cis heritability of human gene expression10.1038/s41588-019-0487-7 ↗
32. Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy10.1038/nrg3723 ↗
33. SNPs for a universal individual identification panel10.1007/s00439-009-0771-1 ↗
34. Genomic research and human subject privacy10.1126/science.1095019 ↗
35. (2018, January 01). Beacon Network. Available online: https://beacon-network.org/.
36. Privacy risks from genomic data-sharing beacons10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.09.010 ↗
37. Hagestedt, I., Zhang, Y., Humbert, M., Berrang, P., Tang, H., Wang, X., and Backes, M. (2019, January 24–27). MBeacon: Privacy-Preserving Beacons for DNA Methylation Data. Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, USA.10.14722/ndss.2019.23064 ↗
38. Homer, N., Szelinger, S., Redman, M., Duggan, D., Tembe, W., Muehling, J., Pearson, J.V., Stephan, D.A., Nelson, S.F., and Craig, D.W. (2008). Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genet., 4.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167 ↗
39. A new statistic and its power to infer membership in a genome-wide association study using genotype frequencies10.1038/ng.455 ↗
40. Visscher, P.M., and Hill, W.G. (2009). The limits of individual identification from sample allele frequencies: Theory and statistical analysis. PLoS Genet., 5.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000628 ↗
41. Genomic privacy and limits of individual detection in a pool10.1038/ng.436 ↗
42. Methylation array data can simultaneously identify individuals and convey protected health information: An unrecognized ethical concern10.1186/1868-7083-6-28 ↗
43. Epigenome data release: A participant-centered approach to privacy protection10.1186/s13059-015-0723-0 ↗
44. Venkatesaramani, R., Malin, B.A., and Vorobeychik, Y. (2021). Re-identification of Individuals in Genomic Datasets Using Public Face Images. arXiv.10.1126/sciadv.abg3296 ↗
45. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference10.1126/science.1229566 ↗
46. Simulating the large-scale erosion of genomic privacy over time10.1109/TCBB.2018.2859380 ↗
47. Berrang, P., Humbert, M., Zhang, Y., Lehmann, I., Eils, R., and Backes, M. (2018, January 24–26). Dissecting privacy risks in biomedical data. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P), London, UK.10.1109/EuroSP.2018.00013 ↗
48. Genome-wide quantitative trait loci mapping of the human cerebrospinal fluid proteome
49. De-anonymizing genomic databases using phenotypic traits10.1515/popets-2015-0020 ↗
50. (2018, January 01). Deciphering the Map of RNA Modifications from Epitranscriptome Sequencing Data. Available online: https://rna.sysu.edu.cn/rmbase/.
51. (2018, January 01). dbSNP, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/.
52. A mechanism for controlled access to GWAS data: Experience of the GAIN Data Access Committee10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.034 ↗
53. Utility-Prioritized Differential Privacy for Quantitative Biomedical Data10.1142/S021812662250236X ↗
54. Fienberg, S.E., Slavkovic, A., and Uhler, C. (2011, January 11). Privacy preserving GWAS data sharing. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICDMW.2011.140 ↗