An In-Silico Study on the Therapeutic Effect of Low Back Belts: Biomechanical Correlation between Belt Design and Patient Morphology
Source abstract
Abstract
A comparative study of eight different lumbar belts, which are representative of the French market, was carried out on four typical morphologies of patients to assess their therapeutic effects and identify the correlation between the therapeutic parameters and mechanical ones. Four typical morphologies were chosen among 15 patients that had been chosen for the clinical study: tall-large, small-large, tall-thin, and small-thin. Simplified 3D finite elements (FE) models of the trunk according to each patient’s morphology were used for numerical analyses using Abaqus SimuliaTM. The same material properties of the body structures and boundary conditions were taken for all models to only focus on morphological variations. The material properties of eight lumbar belts were obtained by mechanical testing. The pressure applied by the belt to the trunk was modelled by Laplace’s law. The influences of belt types on typical morphologies were analyzed and synthetized to show which parameters are significant for biomechanical efficacy and attendance to the therapeutic effects. Finally, we found the following belt effects: (i) the lumbar belt is more efficient on the thin morphology than the large one, (ii) all mechanical values checked on the vertebral disks and vertebrae have a strong correlation with the correction of lordosis angle, and (iii) the belt’s global stiffness is an important parameter for generating the pressure applied to the trunk.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Medical Imaging and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mines Saint-Etienne, Insititut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, University Jean Monnet, U 1059 Sainbiose, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
Thuasne, F-42100 Saint-Etienne, France
Funding
Thuasne Co.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Lumbar Supports for Prevention and Treatment of Low Back Pain, A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group10.1097/00007632-200102150-00014 ↗
2. Effectiveness of a Lumbar Belt in Subacute Low Back Pain: An Open, Multicentric, and Randomized Clinical Study10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819577dc ↗
3. Kaplan, W., Wirtz VJ: Mantel-Teeuwisse, A., Stolk, P., Duthey, B., and Laing, R. (2013). Priority Medicines for Europe and the World, Update 2013 Report.
4. Relationships between strap tension, interface pressures and spine correction in brace treatment of scoliosis
5. New non-invasive and patient-specific method allowing intradiscal pressure change measurement induced by lumbar conservative or surgical treatments10.1016/j.rehab.2012.07.707 ↗
6. The effects of a back-belt on lumbar disc deformation during stoop type lifting
7. Lombacross belt is more effective than medication: Results of a multicentric randomized study with three months follow-up
8. Mal de dos et ceinture lombo abdomino pelvienne: Résultats d’une enquête auprès de 108 personnes
9. The effect of two lumbar belt designs on trunk repositioning sense in people with and without low back pain10.1016/j.rehab.2017.03.002 ↗
10. Mechanical characterization of lumbar belts by measuring strain and interface pressure10.1016/j.rehab.2014.03.431 ↗
11. Low-back pain, its origin and risk indicators10.5271/sjweh.1728 ↗
12. Discogenic low back pain10.1016/j.pmr.2014.01.006 ↗
13. The effect of extensible and non-extensible lumbar belts on trunk postural balance in sujects with low back pain and healthy controls10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.06.013 ↗
14. Im, S.-C., Cho, H.-Y., Lee, J.-H., and Kim, K. (2021). Analysis of the effect of wearing extensible and non-extensible lumbar belts on biomechanical factors of the sit-to-stand movement and pain-related psychological factors affecting office workers with low back pain. Healthcare, 9.10.3390/healthcare9111601 ↗
15. The effect of extensible and non-extensible lumbar belts on trunk muscle activity and lumbar stiffness in subjects with and without low-back pain10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.04.019 ↗
16. Anders, C., and Hübner, A. (2019). Influence of elastic lumbar support belts on trunk muscle function in patients with non-specific acute lumbar back pain. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0211042 ↗
17. Nash, M.P., Nielsen, P.M.F., Wittek, A., Miller, K., and Joldes, G.R. (2020). Parametric study of lumbar belts in the case of low back pain: Effect of patients’ specific characteristics. Computational Biomechanics for Medicine, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-15923-8 ↗
18. Molimard, J., Bonnaire, R., Han, W.S., Convert, R., and Calmels, P. (2019). In-silico pre-clinical trials are made possible by a new simple and comprehensive lumbar belt mechanical model based on the Law of Laplace including support deformation and adhesion effects. PLoS ONE, 14, Available online: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212681.10.1371/journal.pone.0212681 ↗
19. Bonnaire, R. (2015). Caractérisation Mécanique des Orthèses: Application aux Ceintures de Soutien Lombaire dans le Cadre de la Lombalgie. [Ph.D. Thesis, École Nationale des Mines de Saint-Étienne].
20. Biomechanical influence of disk properties on the load transfer of healthy and degenerated disks using a poroelastic finite element model10.1115/1.4002550 ↗
21. (2021, December 31). Liste des Produits et Prestations Remboursables, Version 5 June 2017. (In French).