Energy Bidding Quadratic Model and the Use of the B-Loss Matrix for Determining Consumer Energy Price
Source abstract
Abstract
The liberalization trend has led to electric restructuring in market industries. At the start of the 1990s, it was recommended to shift the electricity business from a monopoly to a competitive system. The electric power problem becomes more complex from competition because competitors must be ready to win or lose. The method that has succeeded in determining energy prices in competition is the locational marginal price method implemented by the New York Service Operator. In general, the characteristic of the supplier offers are in step function forms, so optimizing prices and allocating transmission losses are a problem. This paper proposes a method for determining electrical energy prices on the consumer side in each location. The method uses a quadratic approach to perform direct method optimization. The transmission losses are calculated through the B-loss matrix approach, and then allocations of the transmission losses are separated with the proportional method. Simulation results for three locations with six suppliers, as well as on a larger scale (118 buses, 54 generators) were obtained.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electric Power System Optimization · Smart Grid Energy Management · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia
Energy Conversion Engineering Department, State of Polytechnic of Bandung, Bandung 40559, Indonesia
Funding
Directorate of Research and Community Service, Telkom University
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Lo, K.L., and Yuen, Y.S. (2001). Deregulation of Electric Utilities. Power System Restructuring and Deregulation, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Wiley.10.1002/0470846119.ch2 ↗
2. Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M., and Svento, R. (2012). Real-Time Pricing; An Application to the Nordic Power Markets. Modern Energy Markets, Green Energy and Technology, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-2972-1 ↗
3. A demand side approach for congestion management in competitive environment10.1002/etep.330 ↗
4. Transmission management in the deregulated environment10.1109/5.823997 ↗
5. Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy (2021). Competition in UK Electricity Markets.
6. Lambert, J.D. (2001). Creating Competitive Power Markets: The PJM Model, PennWell.
7. Tierney, S.F. (2010). The New York Independent System Operator: A Ten-Year Review, Analysis Group.
8. Energy and Ancillary Service Dispatch for the Interim ISO New England Electricity Market10.1109/59.871720 ↗
9. Huang, J., Yalla, P., and Yong, T. (2004, January 10–13). Greg Ford and Mark Rothleder, New real time market applications at the California independent system operator (CAISO). Proceedings of the IEEE PES Power System Conference and Exposition, New York, NY, USA.
10. A study of recent changes in Southwest Power Pool and Electric Reliability Council of Texas and its impact on the U.S wind industry10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.074 ↗
11. The impact of wind generation on wholesale electricity market prices in the midcontinent independent system operator energy market: An empirical investigation10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.028 ↗
12. Locational marginal price share: A new structural market power index10.1007/s40565-019-0532-7 ↗
13. Hogan, W.W. (1998). Independent System Operator (ISO) for a Competitive Electricity Market, Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
14. Schweppe, F.C., Caramanis, M.C., Tabors, R.D., and Bohn, R.E. (1998). Spot Pricing of Electricity, Kluwer.
15. Generator’s bidding behavior in the NYISO day-ahead wholesale electricity market10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.001 ↗
16. Qussous, R., Harder, N., and Weidlich, A. (2022). Understanding Power Market Dynamics by Reflecting Market Interrelations and Flexibility-Oriented Bidding Strategis. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15020494 ↗
17. Chen, Y., Ye, L., Zhou, Q., Jiang, Y., Qiang, W., and Zhang, Y. (November, January 30). Bidding Strategis for Thermal Units Considering the Randomness of Renewable Energy Sources in A Unified Power market. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy Integration, Wuhan, China.
18. Kang, I.O., You, H., Choi, K., Jeon, S.K., Lee, J., and Lee, D. (2022). Modeling and Economic Operation of Energy Hub Considering Energy Market Price and Demand. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14042004 ↗
19. Bidding Strategy of Virtual Plant with Energy Storage Power Station and Photovoltaic and Wind Power
20. Strategic bidding via interplay of minimum income condition orders in day-ahead power exchanges10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105126 ↗
21. Csercsik, D. (2020, January 14–17). A Two-Sided Piece-Decoupled Pay=As-Bid Auction Approach for the Clearing of Day-Ahead Electricity Markets. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Power, Energy and Mechanical Engineering (ICPEME 2020), Budapest, Hungary.
22. A Learning-Based Bidding Approach for PV-Attached BESS Power Plants10.3389/fenrg.2021.750796 ↗
23. Introduction of Flexible Production Bids and Combined Package-Price Bids in a Framework of Integrated Power-Reserve Market Coupling10.12700/APH.17.6.2020.6.8 ↗
24. Restructuring and deregulation of Power System—A Review
25. Lakić, E., Medved, T., Zupančič, J., and Gubina, A.F. (2017, January 17). The review of market power detection tools in organised electricity markets. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), Dresden, Germany.10.1109/EEM.2017.7982010 ↗
26. Investigating the Ability of Demand Shifting to Mitigate Electricity Producers’ Market Power10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2782703 ↗
27. Inefficiencies and Market Power in Financial Arbitrage: A Study on California’s Electricity Markets10.1111/j.1467-6451.2008.00344.x ↗
28. Hirsh, R.F. (2001). Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the America Electric Utility System, The MIT Press.
29. Electricity restructuring and the relationship between fuel cost and electricity prices for industrial and residential customers10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111559 ↗
30. On Transmission Congestion and Pricing10.1109/59.744539 ↗
31. A review on Locational Marginal Price (LMP) for deregulated industry
32. New Indices of Market Power in Transmission-Constrained Electricity Markets10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2060738 ↗
33. Locational Marginal Pricing of GENCOs in a Deregulated Energy Market10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i44/101942 ↗
34. Two-Stage-Stochastic Electricity Market Clearing Considering Mobile Energy Storage in Rail Transportation10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3005294 ↗
35. Locational Marginal Pricing Approach for A Deregulated Electricity Market
36. Determining LBMP through Optimal Power Flow in the Electric Power Business
37. Implementation of Electricity Competition Framework with Economic Dispatch Direct Method
38. A Multiagent-Based Consensus Algorithm for Distributed Coordinated Control of Distributed Generators in the Energy Internet10.1109/TSG.2015.2412779 ↗
39. Electric power bidding model for practical utility system10.1016/j.aej.2016.12.002 ↗
40. Optimal Economic Load Dispatch with Prohibited Operating Zones Using Large to Small Area Technique10.15866/irecon.v9i1.19548 ↗