journal article·2022-09-21Open access

Robotics and Vibration Mechanics

Alessandro Gasparetto, Lorenzo Scalera, Ilaria Palomba

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 19

Abstract

Robotics and vibration mechanics are among the main research areas in mechanical engineering [...]
Only a short abstract or summary was supplied by the source.
Source: crossref · Quality: short

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems · Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polytechnic Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Optimum design of high-speed flexible mechanisms10.1016/0094-114X(81)90013-6 ↗
2. Flexible multibody dynamics: Review of past and recent developments10.1023/A:1009773505418 ↗
3. The absolute coordinate formulation with elasto-plastic deformations10.1007/s11044-004-2522-3 ↗
4. Shabana, A.A. (1996). An Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for the Large Rotation and Deformation Analysis of Flexible Bodies, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago. Technical Report.
5. Design and implementation of an ERLS-based 3-D dynamic formulation for flexible-link robots10.1016/j.rcim.2012.07.008 ↗
6. Boscariol, P., Gallina, P., Gasparetto, A., Giovagnoni, M., Scalera, L., and Vidoni, R. (2017). Evolution of a dynamic model for flexible multibody systems. Advances in Italian Mechanism Science, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-48375-7_57 ↗
7. 3-D ERLS based dynamic formulation for flexible-link robots: Theoretical and numerical comparison between the finite element method and the component mode synthesis approaches
8. Howell, L.L. (2013). Compliant mechanisms. 21st Century Kinematics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-4510-3_7 ↗
9. Modal modification of vibrating systems: Some problems and their solutions10.1006/mssp.2000.1354 ↗
10. Belotti, R., Palomba, I., Wehrle, E., and Vidoni, R. (2021). An Approximation-Based Design Optimization Approach to Eigenfrequency Assignment for Flexible Multibody Systems. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311558 ↗
11. Richiedei, D., and Tamellin, I. (2021). Active approaches to vibration absorption through antiresonance assignment: A comparative study. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11031091 ↗
12. Barreto, J.P., Schöler, F.F., and Corves, B. (2017). The concept of natural motion for pick and place operations. New Advances in Mechanisms, Mechanical Transmissions and Robotics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-45450-4_9 ↗
13. Scalera, L., Palomba, I., Wehrle, E., Gasparetto, A., and Vidoni, R. (2019). Natural motion for energy saving in robotic and mechatronic systems. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9173516 ↗
14. An energy-efficient approach for 3D printing with a Linear Delta Robot equipped with optimal springs10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102045 ↗
15. Kashiri, N., Spyrakos-Papastavridis, E., Caldwell, D.G., and Tsagarakis, N.G. (2017, January 28–31). Exploiting the natural dynamics of compliant joint robots for cyclic motions. Proceedings of the 2017 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), Miedzyzdroje, Poland.10.1109/MMAR.2017.8046909 ↗
16. Control of flexible manipulators: A survey10.1017/S0263574703005642 ↗
17. Luca, A.D. (1998). Trajectory control of flexible manipulators. Control Problems in Robotics and Automation, Springer.10.1007/BFb0015078 ↗
18. Rosyid, A., and El-Khasawneh, B. (2020). Multibody Dynamics of Nonsymmetric Planar 3PRR Parallel Manipulator with Fully Flexible Links. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10144816 ↗
19. Rojas, R.A., Wehrle, E., and Vidoni, R. (2020). A multicriteria motion planning approach for combining smoothness and speed in collaborative assembly systems. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10155086 ↗
20. Fehr, J., Schmid, P., Schneider, G., and Eberhard, P. (2020). Modeling, simulation, and vision-/MPC-based control of a PowerCube serial robot. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10207270 ↗
21. Vocetka, M., Huňady, R., Hagara, M., Bobovskỳ, Z., Kot, T., and Krys, V. (2020). Influence of the Approach Direction on the Repeatability of an Industrial Robot. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10238714 ↗
22. Tommasino, D., Cipriani, G., Doria, A., and Rosati, G. (2020). Effect of end-effector compliance on collisions in robotic teleoperation. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10249077 ↗
23. Boscariol, P., Scalera, L., and Gasparetto, A. (2021). Nonlinear control of multibody flexible mechanisms: A model-free approach. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11031082 ↗
24. Cocuzza, S., Doria, A., and Reis, M. (2021). Vibration-based locomotion of an amphibious robot. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052212 ↗
25. Pridie, A.C., and Antonya, C. (2021). The theoretical study of an interconnected suspension system for a formula student car. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11125507 ↗
26. Essomba, T., Sandoval, J., Laribi, M.A., Wu, C.T., Breque, C., Zeghloul, S., and Richer, J.P. (2021). Torque reduction of a reconfigurable spherical parallel mechanism based on craniotomy experimental data. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11146534 ↗