Using a Pair of Different-Sized Spheres to Calibrate Radar Data in the Microwave Anechoic Chamber
Source abstract
Abstract
Traditional radar calibration methods often use one standard sphere as the standard calibration object, but researchers seldom discuss the size and the material content of the calibration sphere. We propose using a pair of different-sized spheres to verify the standard method. In a microwave anechoic chamber, the simulated and measured results show that the radar cross-section (RCS) values of two spheres with radii of 0.15 m and 0.05 m in the Mie region differ from their physical cross-sections in the optic region, and only in the optic region, their difference of RCS value (i.e., 9.5424 dB) can be approximately equal to the theoretical one (i.e., 9.6803 dB). Thus, radar calibration should be conducted in the same scattering region for both the calibration object and the calibrated target. The use of two different-sized spheres can aid in three applications: (1) verifying the scattering regions, (2) searching the pure area in the microwave anechoic chamber, and (3) locating the positions of the targets in the range profiles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques · Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques · Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
Wuhan Geomatics Institute, Wuhan 430022, China
School of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. An Investigation of Bistatic Calibration Techniques10.1109/TGRS.2005.855130 ↗
2. Muth, L.A. (1999, January 22). Calibration Standards and Uncertainties in Radar Cross Section Measurements. Proceedings of the IEEE National Radar Conference, Waltham, MA, USA.
3. Characteristics of Ultra-Wideband Radar Echoes from a Drone10.1587/comex.2017XBL0079 ↗
4. Kent, B.M. (2001, January 8–13). Comparative Measurements of Precision Radar Cross Section (RCS) Calibration Targets. Proceedings of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society, AP-S International Symposium (Digest), Boston, MA, USA.
5. Quantitative Ornithology with a Commercial Marine Radar: Standard-Target Calibration, Target Detection and Tracking, and Measurement of Echoes from Individuals and Flocks10.1111/2041-210X.12699 ↗
6. Knott, E.F., Shaeffer, J.F., and Tuley, M.T. (2004). Radar Cross Section, SciTech Publishing.10.1049/SBRA026E ↗
7. Hess, D.W. (2008, January 17–18). Introduction to RCS Measurements. Proceedings of the 2008 Loughborough Antennas and Propagation Conference, LAPC, Loughborough, UK.10.1109/LAPC.2008.4516860 ↗
8. Electromagnetic Model Reliably Predicts Radar Scattering Characteristics of Airborne Organisms10.1038/srep35637 ↗
9. Skolnik, M. (2008). Radar Handbook, McGraw-Hill Education. [3rd ed.].
10. Mahafza, B.R. (2013). Radar Systems Analysis and Design Using MATLAB, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. [3rd ed.].
11. Resonance Effects within S-Band in Echoes from Birds10.1109/LGRS.2011.2169933 ↗
12. Moon, J.R. (2002, January 15–17). Effects of Birds on Radar Tracking Systems. Proceedings of the IEE Conference Publication, Edinburgh, UK.10.1049/cp:20020296 ↗