Uncertainty Quantification for Infrasound Propagation in the Atmospheric Environment
Source abstract
Abstract
The propagation of infrasound in the atmosphere is influenced by atmospheric environmental parameters, which affect the precise localization of the infrasound source. Therefore, it has become crucial to quantify the influence of atmospheric environmental parameters on infrasound propagation. First, in this paper, the tau-p model is chosen as the physical model of infrasound propagation in a non-uniform moving medium. The atmospheric environmental parameters affecting infrasound propagation are determined. Secondly, the atmospheric environmental parameter distribution data are generated using the Sobol sampling method. Third, the generated atmospheric data are incorporated into the physical model of infrasound propagation to solve the output. Finally, Sobol sensitivity analysis is performed for each parameter, and the atmospheric parameter with the largest Sobol index is identified as the one with the most significant influence on infrasound propagation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Waves and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Image and Signal Denoising Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Institute of Vibration, Shock and Noise, State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
College of Logistics Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, China
Funding
Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions of Chongqing University · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai · Open Fund of the Key Laboratory of Aerodynamic Noise Control · Oceanic Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Raspet, R., Hickey, C.J., and Koirala, B. (2022). Corrected Tilt Calculation for Atmospheric Pressure-Induced Seismic Noise. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031247 ↗
2. Lu, J., Wang, Y., and Chen, J. (2018). Noise Attenuation Based on Wave Vector Characteristics. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8050672 ↗
3. Gonzalez, A., and Calderon, J. (2022). An Overview of the Seismic Elastic Response Spectra and Their Application According to Mexican, U.S., and International Building Codes. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12073472 ↗
4. Li, J., He, M., Cui, G., Wang, X., Wang, W., and Wang, J. (2020). A Novel Method of Seismic Signal Detection Using Waveform Features. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10082919 ↗
5. Infrasound from earthquakes10.1029/2004JD005067 ↗
6. Freret-Lorgeril, V., Bonadonna, C., Corradini, S., Donnadieu, F., Guerrieri, L., Lacanna, G., Marzano, F.S., Mereu, L., Merucci, L., and Ripepe, M. (2021). Examples of Multi-Sensor Determination of Eruptive Source Parameters of Explosive Events at Mount Etna. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13112097 ↗
7. Cigna, F., Tapete, D., and Lu, Z. (2020). Remote Sensing of Volcanic Processes and Risk. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12162567 ↗
8. Batubara, M., and Yamamoto, M.y. (2020). Infrasound Observations of Atmospheric Disturbances Due to a Sequence of Explosive Eruptions at Mt. Shinmoedake in Japan on March 2018. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12040728 ↗
9. De Angelis, S., Diaz-Moreno, A., and Zuccarello, L. (2019). Recent Developments and Applications of Acoustic Infrasound to Monitor Volcanic Emissions. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11111302 ↗
10. Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., and Hauchecorne, A. (2010). Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4020-9508-5 ↗
11. Automatic detection of debris flows and debris floods based on a combination of infrasound and seismic signals10.1007/s10346-015-0640-z ↗
12. A Bayesian framework for infrasound location10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04499.x ↗
13. Improved Bayesian Infrasonic Source Localization for regional infrasound10.1093/gji/ggv387 ↗
14. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals
15. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models
16. On sensitivity estimation for nonlinear mathematical models
17. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6 ↗
18. Zhuang, Y., Luo, S., Easa, S.M., Zhang, M., and Wang, C. (2022). Mechanical Performance of Curved Link-Slab of Simply Supported Bridge Beam. Appl. Sci., 12.10.20944/preprints202202.0324.v1 ↗
19. Evans, M., and Swartz, T. (2000). Approximating Integrals via Monte Carlo and Deterministic Methods, OUP Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198502784.001.0001 ↗
20. Description and quantification of uncertainty in outdoor sound propagation calculations10.1121/1.4890644 ↗
21. Prikaziuk, E., and van der Tol, C. (2019). Global Sensitivity Analysis of the SCOPE Model in Sentinel-3 Bands: Thermal Domain Focus. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11202424 ↗
22. Morcillo-Pallarés, P., Rivera-Caicedo, J.P., Belda, S., De Grave, C., Burriel, H., Moreno, J., and Verrelst, J. (2019). Quantifying the Robustness of Vegetation Indices through Global Sensitivity Analysis of Homogeneous and Forest Leaf-Canopy Radiative Transfer Models. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11202418 ↗
23. Uncertainty Quantification and Global Sensitivity Analysis for Transient Wave Propagation in Pressurized Pipes10.1029/2020WR028975 ↗
24. Sensitivity analysis of two inverse methods: Conventional beamforming and Bayesian focusing10.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.002 ↗
25. Traveltimes for infrasonic waves propagating in a stratified atmosphere10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00618.x ↗
26. Jones, R.M., Gu, E.S., and Bedard, A. (2021, May 10). Infrasonic Atmospheric Propagation Studies Using a 3-D Ray Trace Model. In Preprints, 22nd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, USA, Meteor. Soc. P. Citeseer. Available online: https://cires1.colorado.edu/events/rendezvous/2007/posters/I3B.pdf.
27. Modelling waveforms of infrasound arrivals from impulsive sources using weakly non-linear ray theory10.1093/gji/ggu479 ↗
28. The temporal morphology of infrasound propagation10.1007/s00024-010-0080-6 ↗
29. Regional monitoring of infrasound events using multiple arrays: Application to Utah and Washington State10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03912.x ↗
30. Infrasonic source altitude localization based on an infrasound ray tracing propagation model10.1121/1.5110712 ↗
31. Landau, L., and Lifshitz, E. (1951). The Classical Theory of Fields, Addison-Wesley.
32. A Bayesian approach to sound source reconstruction: Optimal basis, regularization, and focusing10.1121/1.3685484 ↗
33. Bayesian source localization with uncertain Green’s function in an uncertain shallow water ocean10.1121/1.4941997 ↗
34. Wang, R., Yi, X., Yu, L., Zhang, C., Wang, T., and Zhang, X. (2022). Infrasound Source Localization of Distributed Stations Using Sparse Bayesian Learning and Bayesian Information Fusion. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14133181 ↗
35. Characterization of absorption and non-linear effects in infrasound propagation using an augmented Burgers’ equation10.1093/gji/ggw350 ↗
36. Three-dimensional direct numerical simulation of infrasound propagation in the Earth’s atmosphere10.1017/jfm.2018.816 ↗