journal article·2022-08-29Open access

Long-Term Prosthetic Aftercare of Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture

Eran Zenziper, Ofir Rosner, Oded Ghelfan, Joseph Nissan, Sigalit Blumer, Gil Ben-Izhack, Hagay Slutzky, Isabelle Meinster, Liat Chaushu, Sarit Naishlos

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 17

Abstract

Background: Two of the most popular resilient attachment systems for mandibular implant-supported overdenture (MISOD) are locator and ball attachments. The purpose of the present retrospective cohort study was to assess the long-term prosthetic aftercare and oral hygiene status in edentulous patients rehabilitated with MISOD. Materials and Methods: Forty-five consecutive patients were included (22, group A- ball vs. 23, group B- locator attachments). Attachment incorporation into the MISOD was conducted in a direct (chair-side) intraoral technique at the time of denture insertion. Routine follow-up included yearly visits. The number of visits requiring prosthetic aftercare, either during the follow-up or during the additional visit, was recorded. Outcome parameters included—prosthetic aftercare—the number of aftercare (primary outcome parameter) visits, and dental treatment received (pressure sores relief, liner changes due to loss of retention, loss of retention due to debris accumulation, denture repair—secondary outcome parameters); oral hygiene—gingival index (primary outcome parameter). Results: The mean follow-up of the entire study population was 84 ± 21 months, range 39–120 months. Statistical analysis revealed a lower need for prosthetic aftercare interventions in group A (p < 0.001). The mean number of visits dedicated to pressure sores relief (6.09 ± 1.04 vs. 3.03 ± 0.77, p < 0.001) and liner exchange due to loss of retention (5.6 ± 1.03 vs. 2.09 ± 1.04, p < 0.001), were significantly lower in group A. Debris (food/calculus) accumulation inside the attachment was noted only for the locator’s group (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences between the groups were noted for denture repair (p = 0.318). Oral hygiene also exhibited statistically significant differences in favor of group A (2.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.03 ± 0.2, p < 0.001). Conclusions: It can be concluded that using ball attachments for MISOD yields less need for aftercare treatments and improved oral hygiene status over the years.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthodontics, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv 69978, Israel

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv 69978, Israel

Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv 69978, Israel

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Population prevalence of edentulism and its association with depression and self-rated health10.1038/srep37083 ↗
2. Food selections and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses to complete denture wearers10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130313.x ↗
3. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24–25, 2002
4. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures
5. Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: Patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance
6. Prosthetic maintenance of different mandibular implant overdentures: A systematic review10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.037 ↗
7. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws
8. Payne, G.T., and Zarb, G. (2013). Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients: Complete Dentures and Implant-Supported Prostheses, Elsevier.
9. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00369.x ↗
10. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants. 10 year results from a cross-over trial comparing ball- socket and clip-attachments
11. Marginal Bone Level Changes and Prosthetic Maintenance of Mandibular Overdentures Supported by 2 Implants: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00143.x ↗
12. Splinted and unsplinted overdenture attachment systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/joor.12651 ↗
13. Liu, W., Cai, H., Zhang, J., Wang, J., and Sui, L. (2021). Effects of immediate and delayed loading protocols on marginal bone loss around implants in unsplinted mandibular implant-retained overdentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health, 21.10.1186/s12903-021-01486-3 ↗
14. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: A crossover clinical trial
15. Mandibular two implant overdentures: Three years prosthodontic maintenance using the locator attachment system
16. Five years follow-up of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on locator or ball abutments: Implant results, patient-related outcome, and prosthetic aftercare10.1111/cid.12840 ↗
17. Five-year clinical trial using three attachment systems for implant overdentures
18. Brandt, S., Lauer, H.-C., Fehrenz, M., Güth, J.-F., Romanos, G., and Winter, A. (2021). Ball versus locator attachments: A retrospective study on prosthetic maintenance and effect on oral-health- related quality of life. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14041051 ↗
19. Computed tomography evaluation of jaw atrophies before and after surgical bone augmentation
20. A classification of the edentulous jaws10.1016/S0901-5027(88)80047-X ↗
21. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity10.3109/00016356309011240 ↗
22. Microbiological evaluation of Locator® legacy attachments: A cross-sectional clinical study10.1002/cre2.209 ↗
23. Retention of implant supported overdentures at different implant angulations: Comparing locator and ball attachments10.1111/clr.13003 ↗
24. Five-year study of mandibular overdentures on Stud abutments: Clinical outcome, patient satisfaction and prosthetic maintenance—Influence of bone resorption and implant position10.1111/clr.13501 ↗
25. Long-term prosthetic aftercare of direct vs. indirect attachment incorporation techniques to mandibular implant-supported overdenture10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02026.x ↗
26. Retrospective analysis of implant overdenture treatment in the advanced prosthodontic clinic at the university of illinois at chicago10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00089 ↗
27. Rosner, O., Zenziper, E., Heller, H., Nissan, J., Matalon, S., Melamed, G., Har-Ness, S., and Glickman, A. (2021). Long-Term Prosthetic Aftercare of Two-Vs. Four-Ball Attachment Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11198974 ↗
28. Oral mucosa pressure caused by mandibular implant overdenture with different types of attachments
29. Di Spirito, F., Schiavo, L., Pilone, V., Lanza, A., Sbordone, L., and D’Ambrosio, F. (2021). Periodontal and peri-implant diseases and systemically administered statins: A systematic review. Dent. J., 9.10.3390/dj9090100 ↗
30. Obesity and periodontal disease: A narrative review on current evidence and putative molecular links10.2174/1874210601913010526 ↗
31. Evidence-based recommendations on periodontal practice and the management of periodontal patients during and after the COVID-19 era: Challenging infectious diseases spread by airborne transmission10.2174/1874210602115010325 ↗
32. Speranza, A., Massafra, C., Pecchia, S., Di Niccolo, R., Iorio, R., and Ferretti, A. (2022). Metallic versus Non-Metallic Cerclage Cables System in Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Treatment: Single-Institution Experience at a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up. J. Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11061608 ↗
33. Bülhoff, M., Zeifang, F., Welters, C., Renkawitz, T., Schiltenwolf, M., and Tross, A.-K. (2022). Medium- to Long-Term Outcomes after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Standard Long Stem. J. Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11092274 ↗
34. Clinical Results in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty with Cementless Tibial Component in Porous Tantalum: Comparison between Monoblock and Two Pegs vs. Modular and Three Pegs10.3390/prosthesis4020016 ↗