Hierarchy Establishment from Nonlinear Social Interactions and Metabolic Costs: An Application to Harpegnathos saltator
Source abstract
Abstract
Social hierarchies are ubiquitous in social groups such as human societies and social insect colonies; however, the factors that maintain these hierarchies are less clear. Motivated by the shared reproductive hierarchy of the ant species Harpegnathos saltator, we have developed simple compartmental nonlinear differential equations to explore how key life-history and metabolic rate parameters may impact and determine its colony size and the length of its shared hierarchy. Our modeling approach incorporates nonlinear social interactions and metabolic theory. The results from the proposed model, which were linked with limited data, show that: (1) the proportion of reproductive individuals decreases over colony growth; (2) an increase in mortality rates can diminish colony size but may also increase the proportion of reproductive individuals; and (3) the metabolic rates have a major impact in the colony size and structure of a shared hierarchy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Plant and animal studies · Animal Behavior and Reproduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Liberal Arts and Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
School of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
College of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA
School of Science, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China
Funding
National Science Foundation · James S. McDonnell Foundation · Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China · Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province of China
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Scaling of work and energy use in social insect colonies10.1007/s00265-016-2097-z ↗
2. Sidanius, J., and Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139175043 ↗
3. Individual differences versus social dynamics in the formation of animal dominance hierarchies10.1073/pnas.082104199 ↗
4. A unified model of dominance hierarchy formation and maintenance10.1016/S0022-5193(02)93109-7 ↗
5. Hickey, J., and Davidsen, J. (2019). Self-organization and time-stability of social hierarchies. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0211403 ↗
6. Self-Structuring Properties of Dominance Hierarchies: A New Perspective10.1016/B978-0-12-380858-5.00001-0 ↗
7. A Simple Behavioral Model Predicts the Emergence of Complex Animal Hierarchies10.1086/686259 ↗
8. The social hierarchy in albino mice10.1037/h0056350 ↗
9. Social behaviour in confined populations of the Allegheny woodrat, Neotoma floridana magister10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80112-1 ↗
10. A quantitative study of the social behavior of tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus10.2307/1565046 ↗
11. Harcourt, A.H., and De Waal, F.B.M. (1992). Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals, Oxford University Press.
12. Tests of reproductive-skew models in social insects10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.347 ↗
13. Reproductive cooperation between queens and their mated workers: The complex life history of an ant with a valuable nest10.1073/pnas.92.24.10977 ↗
14. Caste and reproduction in ants: Not all mated egg-layers are “queens”10.1155/1988/52368 ↗
15. Reproduction versus work in queenless ants: When to join a hierarchy of hopeful reproductives?10.1007/s002650050637 ↗
16. Helping effort in a dominance hierarchy10.1093/beheco/ari051 ↗
17. Modelling dominance hierarchy formation as a multi-player game10.1006/jtbi.2002.3137 ↗
18. Relative importance of initial individual differences, agonistic experience, and assessment accuracy during hierarchy formation: A simulation study10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00046-6 ↗
19. Quantifying social synergy in insect and human societies10.1007/s00265-010-1059-0 ↗
20. Allometric scaling of metabolism, growth, and activity in whole colonies of the seed-harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus10.1086/656266 ↗
21. Towards a general life-history model of the superorganism: Predicting the survival, growth and reproduction of ant societies10.1098/rsbl.2012.0463 ↗
22. Allometry of behavior10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.005 ↗
23. Ant colony size and the scaling of reproductive effort10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01428.x ↗
24. Larger laboratory colonies consume proportionally less energy and have lower per capita brood production in Temnothorax ants10.1007/s00040-012-0256-4 ↗
25. Colony size and reproduction in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis10.1007/PL00001711 ↗
26. Juvenile hormone induces queen development in late-stage larvae of the ant Harpegnathos saltator10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.10.004 ↗
27. Chemosensory sensitivity reflects reproductive status in the ant Harpegnathos saltator10.1038/s41598-017-03964-7 ↗
28. Sexual reproduction by both queens and workers in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos saltator10.1007/PL00001724 ↗
29. Queen lifespan and colony longevity in the ant Harpegnathos saltator10.1111/j.1365-2311.2004.00583.x ↗
30. Mayoral, A. (2017). Analysis of Egg-Laying Rates of Harpegnathos saltator through Different Methods of Observation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Arizona State University].
31. Reversible plasticity in brain size, behaviour and physiology characterizes caste transitions in a socially flexible ant (Harpegnathos saltator)10.1098/rspb.2021.0141 ↗
32. Liebig, J. (1998). Eusociality, Female Caste Specialization, and Regulation of Reproduction in the Ponerine ant Harpegnathos Saltator Jerdon, Wiss.-und-Technik.
33. Are ant workers capable of colony foundation?10.1007/s001140050470 ↗
34. Differentiating causality and correlation in allometric scaling: Ant colony size drives metabolic hypometry
35. Scaling of insect metabolic rate is inconsistent with the nutrient supply network model10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01245.x ↗
36. Worker reproduction in the higher eusocial Hymenoptera10.1086/415930 ↗
37. Conflicts, social economics and life history strategies in ants10.1007/BF00180301 ↗
38. Stephens, D.W., and Krebs, J.R. (1986). Foraging Theory, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691206790 ↗
39. Poethke, H.J., and Liebig, J. (2008). Risk-sensitive foraging and the evolution of cooperative breeding and reproductive skew. BMC Ecol., 8.10.1186/1472-6785-8-2 ↗
40. Worker policing limits the number of reproductives in a ponerine ant10.1098/rspb.1999.0858 ↗
41. Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E.O. (2009). The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies, WW Norton & Company.