journal article·2022-08-19Open access

Correlation between Bladder Neck Preservation, Positive Surgical Margins, and Biochemical Recurrence in Laparoscopic and Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study

Boris M. Kajmakovic, Milos Petrovic, Petar Bulat, Uros Bumbasirevic, Bogomir Milojevic, Zoran Bukumiric, Djordje Cvijanovic, Daniel Skrijelj, Aleksandar Jovanovic, Adi Hadzibegovic, Sanja Ratkovic, Zoran Dzamic

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 16

Abstract

Background: Bladder neck preservation (BNP) has been adopted in open (ORP), laparoscopic (LRP), and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, there are concerns that this technique can compromise oncological outcome and increase positive surgical margins (PSM). The aim was to evaluate the outcome of BNP, focusing on surgical and pathological outcomes, as well as biochemical recurrence (BCR). Methods: We prospectively collected demographic and clinical data from 170 consecutive patients who underwent ORP and LRP between 2014 and 2020. ORP was performed in 63 patients, and the rest underwent LRP. BNP was performed in 85 patients. Results: PSM were found in 24.7% of patients. Of patients with BNP, 22.4% had PSM. There was no significant statistical difference between patients with or without BNP in the form of PSM. Base-positive margins were detected in 9.4% of patients with BNP and in 5.9% of patients without BNP with no statistical significance. Bioptic Gleason score, clinical stage, and preoperative PSA were statistically significantly correlated with PSM. BCR was more common in patients without BNP (23.5%) vs. non-BNP (21.2%). The only statistically significant predictor of BCR was PSM. Conclusion: This study suggests that BNP in RP is not associated with an increased level of PSM. Preoperative PSA, bioptic Gleason score, and clinical T stage of disease were identified as predictors of PSM occurrence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Urological Disorders and Treatments · Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Clinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11221 Belgrade, Serbia

Institute for Medical Statistic and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11221 Belgrade, Serbia

Center for Anesthesia and Resuscitation, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Cancer Statistics, 201710.3322/caac.21387 ↗
2. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003 ↗
3. Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review10.1159/000435861 ↗
4. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Reporting Oncologic Outcome after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047 ↗
5. Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy10.1007/s11934-017-0745-0 ↗
6. Early Continence after Radical Prostatectomy10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36519-9 ↗
7. Impact of Complete Bladder Neck Preservation on Urinary Continence, Quality of Life and Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Single Blind Trial10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.082 ↗
8. Complete bladder neck preservation promotes long-term post-prostatectomy continence without compromising midterm oncological outcome: Analysis of a randomised controlled cohort10.1007/s00345-017-2134-1 ↗
9. Urinary Continence and Pathological Outcome after Bladder Neck Preservation during Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Prospective Trial10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66534-2 ↗
10. Positive Surgical Margins in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Impact of Apical Dissection, Bladder Neck Remodeling and Nerve Preservation10.1097/01.ju.0000065822.15012.b7 ↗
11. Patterns of spread of adenocarcinoma in the prostate as related to cancer volume10.1002/pros.1117 ↗
12. The handling and sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens for reporting and research: The Oxford approach10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200923 ↗
13. Radical prostatectomy: Bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing—Effects on continence and positive margins10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01956-8 ↗
14. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.025 ↗
15. The male urethral sphincter complex revisited: An anatomical concept and its physiological correlate10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.010 ↗
16. Bladder neck sparing (BNS) robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): Does it improve continence?10.1016/S1569-9056(16)61188-0 ↗
17. Bladder Neck Sparing in Radical Prostatectomy10.4103/0970-1591.120118 ↗
18. Bladder Neck Preservation Improves Time to Continence after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.18632/oncotarget.11997 ↗
19. Stepwise Description and Outcomes of Bladder Neck Sparing during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.045 ↗
20. Prospective Non-Randomized Evaluation of Four Mediators of the Systemic Response after Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic and Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06849.x ↗
21. Surgical Margin Status of Open versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
22. Bladder Neck Preservation during Classic Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy—Point of Technique and Preliminary Results
23. Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with Bladder Neck Preservation: Positive Surgical Margin and Urinary Continence Status10.5114/wiitm.2014.45085 ↗
24. Update on Bladder Neck Preservation during Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Impact on Pathologic Outcome, Anastomotic Strictures, and Continence10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00463-9 ↗
25. Radical Prostatectomy with Bladder Neck Preservation: Impact of a Positive Margin10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00103-9 ↗
26. Anatomic Bladder Neck Preservation during Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Description of Technique and Outcomes10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.017 ↗
27. Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Patients with Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.3389/fonc.2020.539592 ↗
28. Positive Surgical Margins at Radical Prostatectomy Predict Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.017 ↗
29. The Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality Following Radical Prostatectomy during the Prostate Specific Antigen Era10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.039 ↗
30. The Importance of Surgical Margins in Prostate Cancer10.1002/jso.24109 ↗
31. Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease risk group10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.132 ↗