Numerical Investigation on the Spudcan Penetration into Sand Overlying Clay Considering the Strain Effects
Source abstract
Abstract
A numerical model with a Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian (CEL) approach is proposed for spudcan penetration into sand overlying clay. Both stress-dependence and strain-softening effects are incorporated into the M–C model to describe the sand, whereas the Tresca model with softening effect is used to describe the clay. Effects of the critical state strain threshold in the strain-softening model of sand and the clay sensitivity in the strain-softening model for clay are investigated. The model is verified against different soil conditions: uniform sand, loose sand overlying clay, and dense sand overlying clay. It is found that the stress-dependence effect dominates shallow penetration, whereas the strain-softening effect dominates deep penetration. The assumption of a constant peak friction angle for the accumulated deviatoric plastic strain less than the threshold of peak friction angle leads to an overestimation of the resistance in loose sand. Furthermore, the fit parameter obtained from triaxial tests tends to underestimate the peak resistance in dense sand. The proposed model should provide a valuable tool for geotechnical engineering analysis in sand.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617, China
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Dezhou University, Dezhou 253023, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of China · Open Project Program of Beijing Key Laboratory of Pipeline Critical Technology and Equipment for Deepwater Oil & Gas Development
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Advances in the prediction of spudcan punch-through in double-layered soils10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103038 ↗
2. A comparison of jack-up spudcan penetration predictions and recorded field data10.1016/j.apor.2021.102713 ↗
3. Dembicki, E., and Odrobinski, W. (1973, January 6). A contribution to the tests on the bearing capacity of stratified subsoil under the foundation. Proceedings of the 8th International Conferences on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, Russia.
4. Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Footings on Sand Layer Overlying Clay10.1139/t74-018 ↗
5. Analytical and model studies of reinforcement of a layer of granular fill on a soft clay subgrade10.1139/t87-075 ↗
6. The bearing capacity of footings on a sand layer overlying soft clay10.1680/geot.1997.47.2.339 ↗
7. Deep penetration of spud-can foundations on sand and clay10.1680/geot.1990.40.4.541 ↗
8. Centrifuge Model Tests on Bearing Capacity And Deformation of Sand Layer Overlying Clay10.3208/sandf.37.73 ↗
9. Centrifuge model study of spudcan penetration in sand overlying clay10.1680/geot.8.P.077 ↗
10. Bearing capacity on sand overlying clay soils: Experimental and finite-element investigation of potential punch-through failure10.1680/geot.12.P.175 ↗
11. Predicting the resistance profile of a spudcan penetrating sand overlying clay10.1139/cgj-2013-0374 ↗
12. Predicting Peak Resistance of Spudcan Penetrating Sand Overlying Clay10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001016 ↗
13. Bearing capacity on sand overlying clay soils: A simplified conceptual model10.1680/geot.12.P.176 ↗
14. Field experimental investigation of punch-through for different operational conditions during the jack-up rig spudcan penetration in sand overlying clay10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107823 ↗
15. Improved Prediction of Peak Resistance for Spudcan Penetration in Sand Layer Overlying Clay10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002697 ↗
16. Improved Prediction of Spudcan Penetration Resistance by an Observation-Optimized Model10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002343 ↗
17. Measured and calculated spudcan penetration profiles for case histories in sand-over-clay10.1016/j.apor.2018.10.027 ↗
18. Numerical study of spudcan penetration in loose sand overlying clay10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.05.012 ↗
19. Eulerian Finite-Element Technique for Analysis of Jack-Up Spudcan Penetration10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000111 ↗
20. Controlled installation of spudcan foundations on loose sand overlying weak clay10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.06.005 ↗
21. Predicting jack-up spudcan installation in sand overlying stiff clay10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.09.046 ↗
22. A finite element approach for predicting the full resistance profile of a spudcan deeply penetrating in dense sand overlying clay10.1016/j.apor.2019.03.026 ↗
23. Large deformation finite element analyses in geotechnical engineering10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.005 ↗
24. Numerical investigation of bearing capacity due to spudcan penetration in sand overlying clay10.1139/t2012-085 ↗
25. A smooth hyperbolic approximation to the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion10.1016/0045-7949(94)00339-5 ↗
26. von A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199607)1:3<251::AID-CFM13>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
27. Viscous behaviour of soil under oedometric conditions10.1139/t96-031 ↗
28. Combining upper bound and strain path methods for evaluating penetration resistance10.1002/nme.1350 ↗
29. Application of a Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach on geomechanical problems involving large deformations10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.09.002 ↗
30. Lateral boundary effects in centrifuge foundation tests
31. Ullah, S.N., and Hu, Y. (2012, January 10–15). A numerical investigation into the bottom boundary effect for spudcan penetration on sand overlying clay in centrifuge test. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering—OMAE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1115/OMAE2012-84246 ↗
32. 3D Numerical simulations of elastomeric bearings for bridges10.1007/s41062-016-0045-4 ↗
33. Mina, D., and Forcellini, D. (2020). Soil–structure interaction assessment of the 23 november 1980 irpinia-basilicata earthquake. Geosci., 10.10.3390/geosciences10040152 ↗
34. Castelli, F., Grasso, S., Lentini, V., and Sammito, M.S.V. (2021). Effects of soil-foundation-interaction on the seismic response of a cooling tower by 3d-fem analysis. Geosci., 11.10.3390/geosciences11050200 ↗
35. SNAME (2008). Guidelines for Site Specific Assessment of Mobile Jack-Up Units, T&R Bulletin 5-5 and 5-5A., SNAME.
36. The strength and dilatancy of sands10.1680/geot.1986.36.1.65 ↗
37. Progressive failure analysis of shallow foundations on soils with strain-softening behaviour10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.07.002 ↗
38. A prediction method for anchor penetration depth in clays10.1080/17445302.2015.1116244 ↗
39. Gao, P., Liu, Z., Shi, D., Fu, X., and Yan, K. (2020). Mitigation effect of perforation drilling on the sliding risk during spudcan installation close to footprints. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8020118 ↗
40. A comparison of the bearing capacity of flat and conical circular foundations on sand10.1680/geot.2008.3781 ↗