Closed-Form Sum-Rate Analysis of Interference Alignment with Limited Feedback Based on Scalar Quantization and Random Vector Quantization
Source abstract
Abstract
Interference alignment (IA) is a promising interference management technique to achieve the theoretical optimal degree of freedom (DoF) performance in multi-user cooperation scenarios. However, the effective achievable sum-rate performance of IA is largely affected by the feedback overhead and accuracy of channel state information (CSI) and decoding information (DI). Therefore, it is critical to establish the exact relationship between feedback overhead and the achievable sum-rate of IA to obtain the optimal effective performance. Most existing IA performance analysis approaches focus on the vector quantization (VQ)-based feedback strategy, but the implementation complexity of VQ will be excessive when more quantization bits are required to achieve the expected quantization accuracy for larger-sized matrices or higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regimes. Moreover, the obtained achievable sum-rate formulas are too complicated for quick performance evaluation. In this paper, a new sum-rate performance analysis method for IA under different quantization and feedback strategies is proposed to achieve a trade-off between accuracy and complexity, and the closed-form achievable sum-rate expressions are derived. First, in the IA case with random vector quantization (RVQ)-based CSI feedback, the quantization error of RVQ is transformed into the equivalent VQ error of the Gaussian channel error, based on which the achievable sum-rate formula is obtained. Second, in the IA case with scalar quantization (SQ)-based CSI feedback, the relationship between the effective sum-rate and SQ bits is established. Third, in the IA case with SQ-based CSI feedback and RVQ-based DI feedback, the achievable sum-rate formula is derived by combining these two kinds of quantization errors. Finally, the simulation results confirm that the theoretical results are accurate enough, which can help to determine the optimal CSI feedback overhead in practical channel conditions. Moreover, the theoretical and simulation results demonstrate that RVQ may be more applicable to IA scenarios with fewer receiving antennas and low SNR regimes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization · Cooperative Communication and Network Coding · Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Integrated Service Networks, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
Guangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Guangzhou 510555, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Interference alignment: A new look at signal dimensions in a communication network
2. Adaptive Strategy of General Centralized Feedback Model for Interference Alignment in Asymmetric Interference Networks10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2883331 ↗
3. The practical challenges of interference alignment10.1109/MWC.2013.6472197 ↗
4. On the Overhead of Interference Alignment: Training, Feedback, and Cooperation10.1109/TWC.2012.092412120588 ↗
5. Quantization10.1109/18.720541 ↗
6. A Novel MIMO Channel State Feedback Scheme and Overhead Calculation
7. On Achievable Rate of User Selection for MIMO Broadcast Channels With Limited Feedback
8. Evolution of Limited-Feedback CoMP Systems from 4G to 5G: CoMP Features and Limited-Feedback Approaches10.1109/MVT.2014.2334451 ↗
9. Özbek, B., and Le Ruyet, D. (2014). Feedback Strategies for Wireless Communication, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7741-9 ↗
10. Asplund, H., Astely, D., von Butovitsch, P., Chapman, T., Frenne, M., Ghasemzadeh, F., Hagström, M., Hogan, B., Jongren, G., and Karlsson, J. (2020). Advanced Antenna Systems for 5G Network Deployments: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-820046-9.00014-9 ↗
11. MIMO Broadcast Channels With Finite-Rate Feedback10.1109/TIT.2006.883550 ↗
12. Thukral, J., and Bolcskei, H. (July, January 28). Interference alignment with limited feedback. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Seoul, Korea.10.1109/ISIT.2009.5205266 ↗
13. Interference Alignment Under Limited Feedback for MIMO Interference Channels10.1109/TSP.2013.2264055 ↗
14. Xie, B., Li, Y., Minn, H., and Nosratinia, A. (2011, January 5–9). Interference Alignment under Training and Feedback Constraints. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference—GLOBECOM 2011, Houston, TX, USA.
15. Performance Analysis and Optimization for Interference Alignment Over MIMO Interference Channels With Limited Feedback10.1109/TSP.2014.2304926 ↗
16. Throughput Analysis of Interference Alignment for a General Centralized Limited Feedback Model10.1109/TVT.2015.2509501 ↗
17. Interference Alignment for Uplink Cellular Systems with Limited Feedback10.1109/LCOMM.2012.050112.120316 ↗
18. Limited Feedback Design for Interference Alignment on Two-Cell Interfering MIMO-MAC10.1109/TVT.2014.2366470 ↗
19. Grouping-Based Interference Alignment with IA-Cell Assignment in Multi-Cell MIMO MAC Under Limited Feedback10.1109/TSP.2015.2496356 ↗
20. Interference Alignment for Downlink Multi-Cell LTE-Advanced Systems With Limited Feedback10.1109/TWC.2016.2612628 ↗
21. Tresch, R., and Guillaud, M. (2009, January 14–18). Cellular Interference Alignment with Imperfect Channel Knowledge. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, Dresden, Germany.10.1109/ICCW.2009.5208018 ↗
22. Performance Analysis of Interference Alignment Under CSI Mismatch10.1109/TVT.2014.2316166 ↗
23. Retrospective Interference Alignment for the K -User M × N MIMO Interference Channel10.1109/TWC.2016.2614276 ↗
24. Performance Analysis of Rate Splitting in K-User Interference Channel Under Imperfect CSIT: Average Sum Rate, Outage Probability and SER10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3011144 ↗
25. Grassmannian Differential Limited Feedback for Interference Alignment10.1109/TSP.2012.2218238 ↗
26. Precoder Feedback Schemes for Robust Interference Alignment With Bounded CSI Uncertainty10.1109/TSIPN.2020.2995964 ↗
27. Peng, S., Lu, W., Zhong, L., and Kong, Z. (2020, January 25–28). Spatial Interference Alignment Relying on Limited Precoding Matrix Feedback Indices. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring), Antwerp, Belgium.10.1109/VTC2020-Spring48590.2020.9129168 ↗
28. Novel Codebook Design for Channel State Information Quantization in MIMO Rician Fading Channels With Limited Feedback10.1109/TSP.2021.3077807 ↗
29. Time-Varying Downlink Channel Tracking for Quantized Massive MIMO Networks10.1109/TWC.2020.3004887 ↗
30. A Distributed Numerical Approach to Interference Alignment and Applications to Wireless Interference Networks10.1109/TIT.2011.2142270 ↗
31. Hunger, R. (2005). Floating Point Operations in Matrix-Vector Calculus, Munich University of Technology, Inst. for Circuit Theory and Signal Processing.
32. Neutrosophic Rayleigh Model With Some Basic Characteristics and Engineering Applications10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3078150 ↗
33. Sampling Plan Using Process Loss Index Using Multiple Dependent State Sampling Under Neutrosophic Statistics10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906408 ↗
34. Design of Sampling Plan for Exponential Distribution Under Neutrosophic Statistical Interval Method10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877923 ↗
35. Analyzing wind power data using analysis of means under neutrosophic statistics10.1007/s00500-021-05661-0 ↗