Bond Characteristics of a Deformed Steel Bar Embedded in Donut-Type Voided Slab
Source abstract
Abstract
In reinforced concrete (RC) structures, bond behavior between concrete and deformed steel bar (rebar) has a great effect on the structural behavior of members including voided slabs. According to previous research, bond behavior of a rebar in voided slabs is different from that in general RC slabs by the concrete inner cover formed between rebar and void. However, the bond characteristics of rebar in voided slabs have not been clearly verified yet. This study investigated the bond characteristics of rebar in the donut-type voided slab. Like other voided slabs, the donut-type void-shaper make concrete inner cover formed between rebar and void, and some part of the donut-type voided slab has smaller inner cover thickness than 2.5 db. Furthermore, inner cover thickness changes along the longitudinal rebar due to the shape of void. These were expected to affect the bond behavior of rebar in the donut-type voided slab. In this study, pull-out tests were performed to find out the effect of bond condition by the region due to voids. To this end, the donut-type voided slab was divided into three regions according to the shape of void, such as ‘Insufficient region’, ‘Transition region’, and ‘Sufficient region’. Main variables were inner cover thickness, embedded length, and bond location, which is affected by void shape. Bond characteristics of rebar in the donut-type voided slab were evaluated through comparison of bond stress–slip relationship, maximum bond strength, and bond stress distribution of each region. Test results showed that the average bond stress was found to be 25~50% lower than that of the general RC slab in the region of the inner cover thickness of 2.5 db, which was not satisfied due to void, and the bond stress–slip relationship and the bond stress distribution of the donut-type voided slab was also different from that of the general RC slab according to the type of bond region and inner cover thickness. In addition, the calculation method of bond strength of rebar in donut-type voided slab was proposed, which indicated that the error range between the estimated value and the experimental value was within 5%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Architectural Engineering, Daejin University, 1007, Hoguk-ro, Pocheon-si 11159, Korea
Department Fire and Disaster Prevention Engineering, Kyungnam University, Changwon 51767, Korea
Funding
Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA)
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 408-03 (2003). Bond and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension (ACI 408R-03), American Concrete Institute.
2. BubbleDeck Technology (2008). BubbleDeck Voided Flat Slab Solutions—Technical Manual & Documents, BubbleDeck UK.
3. Voided Slab Design: Review Paper
4. Flexural capacity and stiffness of monolithic biaxial hollow slabs10.3846/13923730.2014.917122 ↗
5. Experimental and analytical investigation of punching shear capacity of biaxial voided slabs10.1016/j.istruc.2019.03.013 ↗
6. Experimental evaluation on punching shear of two-way void slab-to-column connection with TVS lightweight ball
7. An Analytical Study on the Optimal Hollow Spheres in a Biaxial Hollow Slab
8. Flexural Capacities of One-way hollow slab with Donut type Hollow Sphere
9. One-way Shear Strength of Circular Voided Reinforced Concrete Floor Slabs10.1680/stbu.14.00044 ↗
10. Evaluation of punching shear strength of voided slabs considering the effect of the ratio b0/d10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.085 ↗
11. Two-Way Flexural Behavior of Donut-Type Voided Slabs10.1186/s40069-018-0247-6 ↗
12. Experimental Evaluation of Effective Flexural Ridigity in Reinforced Concrete Beams Considering Tension Stiffening Effect10.4334/JKCI.2005.17.6.1033 ↗
13. Crack Spacing in RC Tension Members Considering Cover Thickness and Concrete Compressive Strength10.5000/EESK.2018.22.3.193 ↗
14. Zuo, J., and Darwin, D. (1998). Bond Strength of High Relative Rib Area Reinforcing Bars, University of Kansas Center for Research. SM Report 46.
15. Influence of Splitting Cracks on Tension Stiffening
16. Avak, R. (2001). Topic: BubbleDeck-A New Type of Hollow-Body Ceiling, Institute of Concrete. Report No. 9919586.
17. Bond Stress-Strain Predict Model with Inner Cover Thickness of Steel Wire Used in Void Deck Plate
18. (2010). Standard Test Method for Comparing Concrete on the Basis of the Bond Developed with Reinforcing Steel (Standard No. KS F 2441).
19. Bond Performance of Reinforcing Bars Embedded in High-Strength Concrete
20. Empirical Study of Bar Development Behavior10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:1(205) ↗
21. Splice Strength of Conventional and High Relative Rib Area Bars in Normal and High-Strength Concrete
22. CEB-FIP (2010). CEB-FIP Model Code 2010 First complete draft, Volume 1, CEB-FIP. fib Bulletin No. 55.
23. Rilem-Fip-Ceb (1973). Bond test for reinforcing steel: 1-Beam test (7-II-28 D). 2-Pullout test (7-II-128): Tentative recommendations. Mater. Struct., 6, 96–105.