Preliminary Design and Testing of a Resetting Combination Anchor, Antenna, and Tether Mechanism for a Spherical Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
Source abstract
Abstract
This article details the preliminary design and testing of a Resetting Anchor/Antenna Tether Mechanism (RAATM) for an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV). The proposed mechanism is intended to enable an AUV to secure itself to the seabed, ascend, descend, transmit and receive signals via the tether, retract the anchor, and re-anchor again as required. The ability of an AUV to passively loiter on station for extended periods preserves power and may otherwise expand mission capabilities for a variety of underwater vehicles. If they are capable of communication through electromagnetic transmission, AUVs equipped with such technology may be utilized to form mobile networks that may, in turn, receive external communications from above the surface. Spherical AUV (SAUV) capabilities may be especially enhanced through the integration of the proposed mechanism. The RAATM was designed for integration with the Wreck Interior Exploration Vehicle (WIEVLE), a small SAUV designed for operations in entanglement-prone, extreme environments, but the RAATM may be used in any suitably-sized underwater vehicle capable of safely contacting the ocean floor. A prototype of the anchoring portion of the mechanism was constructed, and anchoring strength was tested repeatedly in three types of sediment, under varied configurations and loading angles, with promising results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems · Underwater Acoustics Research · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, USA
Funding
Naval Research Program (NRP)
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. A one-armed anchor of c. 400 BCE from the Ma’agan Michael vessel, Israel. A preliminary report10.1111/j.1095-9270.1991.tb00315.x ↗
2. Between tide and wave marks: A unifying model of physical zonation on littoral shores10.7717/peerj.154 ↗
3. Williams, D.L. (2002). Loitering Behaviors of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, Naval Postgraduate School. Technical Report.
4. Eldred, R., Lussier, J., and Pollman, A. (2021). Design and Testing of a Spherical Autonomous Underwater Vehicle for Shipwreck Interior Exploration. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9030320 ↗
5. Richmond, K., Gulati, S., Flesher, C., Hogan, B.P., and Stone, W.C. (2009, January 23–26). Navigation, control, and recovery of the ENDURANCE under-ice hovering AUV. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology (UUST), Durham, NH, USA.
6. Gary, M., Fairfield, N., Stone, W.C., Wettergreen, D., Kantor, G., and Sharp, J.M. (2008). 3D mapping and characterization of Sistema Zacatón from DEPTHX (DE ep P hreatic TH ermal e X plorer). Sinkholes and the Engineering and Environmental Impacts of Karst, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
7. Milosevic, Z., Fernandez, R.A.S., Dominguez, S., and Rossi, C. (2020). Guidance for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles in Confined Semistructured Environments. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20247237 ↗
8. Hinz, E.R. (1994). The Complete Book of Anchoring and Mooring, Cornell Maritime Press/Tidewater Publishers.
9. Rousmaniere, J. (1999). The Annapolis Book of Seamanship: Completely Revised, Expanded and Updated, Simon and Schuster.
10. House, D. (2007). Ship Handling, Routledge.10.4324/9780080550107 ↗
11. Pyo, J., Yu, S.C., Park, J.C., and Park, S.C. (2012, January 21–24). Development of a robotic anchoring system for underwater vehicle under water current. Proceedings of the 2012 Oceans, Yeosu, Korea.10.1109/OCEANS-Yeosu.2012.6263395 ↗
12. McCarter, B., Briggs, R., Portner, S., Stilwell, D., Neu, W., Coe, R., Duelley, R., Malley, D., and Mims, J. (2012, January 14–19). Design and testing of a self-mooring AUV. Proceedings of the 2012 Oceans, Hampton Roads, VA, USA.10.1109/OCEANS.2012.6405053 ↗
13. Bin-Karim, S., Muglia, M., Mazzoleni, A., and Vermillion, C. (2018, January 27–29). Control of a relocatable energy-harvesting autonomous underwater vehicle in a spatiotemporally-varying gulf stream resource. Proceedings of the 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, USA.10.23919/ACC.2018.8431318 ↗
14. Modeling and dynamic analysis of a mobile underwater turbine system for harvesting marine hydrokinetic energy10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.051 ↗
15. Bin-Karim, S., Muglia, M., and Vermillion, C. (2019, January 19–21). Centralized position optimization of multiple agents in spatiotemporally-varying environment: A case study with relocatable energy-harvesting autonomous underwater vehicles in the gulf stream. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), Hong Kong, China.10.1109/CCTA.2019.8920645 ↗
16. Reed, J., Daniels, J., Siddiqui, A., Cobb, M., and Vermillion, C. (2020, January 1–3). Optimal exploration and charging for an autonomous underwater vehicle with energy-harvesting kite. Proceedings of the 2020 American Control Conference (ACC), Denver, CO, USA.10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147746 ↗
17. Brizard, T. (2016). Jet-pump-based autonomous underwater vehicle and method for coupling to ocean bottom during marine seismic survey. (9381986B2), U.S. Patent.
18. Underwater digital communication utilising parametric sonar with M-ary DPSK modulation10.1049/ip-rsn:19990497 ↗
19. An overview of sonar and electromagnetic waves for underwater communication10.4103/0256-4602.101312 ↗
20. Li, Y., Yin, H., Ji, X., and Wu, B. (2018, January 6–9). Design and implementation of underwater wireless optical communication system with high-speed and full-duplex using blue/green light. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), Chengdu, China.10.1109/ICCSN.2018.8488232 ↗
21. Gough, P.T., and Hawkins, D.W. (1998, January 6–10). A short history of synthetic aperture sonar. Proceedings of the IGARSS’98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. (Cat. No. 98CH36174), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/IGARSS.1998.699529 ↗
22. The role of blue/green laser systems in strategic submarine communications10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094858 ↗
23. Propagation of laser beams through air-sea turbulence channels
24. Inácio, S.I., Pereira, M.R., Santos, H.M., Pessoa, L.M., Teixeira, F.B., Lopes, M.J., Aboderin, O., and Salgado, H. (2016, January 10–13). Antenna design for underwater radio communications. Proceedings of the Oceans 2016, Shanghai, China.10.1109/OCEANSAP.2016.7485705 ↗
25. Kelley, B., and Naishadham, K. (2013, January 20–23). RF multicarrier signaling and antenna systems for low SNR broadband underwater communications. Proceedings of the IEEE Topical Conference on Power Amplifiers for Wireless and Radio Applications, Austin, TX, USA.10.1109/PAWR.2013.6490225 ↗
26. Smolyaninov, I., Balzano, Q., and Young, D. (2020). Development of broadband underwater radio communication for application in unmanned underwater vehicles. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.20944/preprints202003.0468.v1 ↗
27. Rogers, R.L., and Buhl, D.P. (2002). Clandestine ELOS/OTH RF Communications for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles, Applied Research Laboratories, University of Texas. Technical Report.
28. Aboderin, O., Pessoa, L.M., and Salgado, H.M. (2017, January 29–31). Performance evaluation of antennas for underwater applications. Proceedings of the Wireless Days, Porto, Portugal.10.1109/WD.2017.7918142 ↗
29. Development of a trailing-wire E-field submarine antenna for extremely low frequency (ELF) reception10.1109/TCOM.1974.1092234 ↗
30. Palmeiro, A., Martin, M., Crowther, I., and Rhodes, M. (2011, January 6–9). Underwater radio frequency communications. Proceedings of the Oceans 2011 IEEE, Santander, Spain.10.1109/Oceans-Spain.2011.6003580 ↗
31. Potter, J., Alves, J., Green, D., Zappa, G., Nissen, I., and McCoy, K. (2014, January 3–5). The JANUS underwater communications standard. Proceedings of the 2014 Underwater Communications and Networking (UComms), Sestri Levante, Italy.10.1109/UComms.2014.7017134 ↗
32. Alves, J., Furfaro, T., LePage, K., Munafò, A., Pelekanakis, K., Petroccia, R., and Zappa, G. (2016, January 19–23). Moving JANUS forward: A look into the future of underwater communications interoperability. Proceedings of the Oceans 2016 MTS/IEEE, Monterey, CA, USA.10.1109/OCEANS.2016.7761094 ↗
33. SDRT: A reliable data transport protocol for underwater sensor networks10.1016/j.adhoc.2010.02.003 ↗
34. Luo, Y., Pu, L., Peng, Z., Zhou, Z., and Cui, J.H. (2012, January 5–6). CT-MAC: A MAC protocol for underwater MIMO based network uplink communications. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Underwater Networks and Systems, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1145/2398936.2398966 ↗
35. Akyildiz, I.F., Pompili, D., and Melodia, T. (2006, January 25). State-of-the-art in protocol research for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1145/1161039.1161043 ↗
36. AURP: An AUV-aided underwater routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks10.3390/s120201827 ↗
37. Silt: 2–62 μm, 9–4φ10.1016/S0012-8252(98)00035-X ↗
38. Definition of clay and clay mineral: Joint report of the AIPEA nomenclature and CMS nomenclature committees10.1346/CCMN.1995.0430213 ↗