Herbst Appliance Reinforced with an Hybrid Hyrax Expander and Two Miniscrews in the Lower Arch: Case Report
Source abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Class II growing patients can be successfully treated with the Herbst appliance, nevertheless this therapy generally produces side effects, such as upper incisors retroclination and lower incisors proclination, which eventually could reduce mandibular forward advancement. Treatment objectives: The purpose of this article is to show a treatment of class II malocclusion with crowding in both arches by a skeletally reinforced Herbst appliance. Treatment description: Two miniscrews were applied in the lower arch to control lower incisors proclination and in the upper arch an Hybrid palatal expander was used. Results: the correction of the severe class II malocclusion was obtained with mandibular advancement, avoiding lower incisors proclination with control also of the upper incisors. Upper crowding with lack of space for upper canine alignment was corrected. Conclusions: Upper and lower miniscrews worked successfully as anchorage for the entire treatment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · dental development and anomalies · Cleft Lip and Palate Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genova University, 16132 Genoa, Italy
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: Estimates from the NHANES-III survey
2. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.010 ↗
3. McNamara, J.A., and Brudon, W.L. (2001). Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Needham Press Inc.
4. The effects of Twin Blocks: A prospective controlled study10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70282-3 ↗
5. Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance10.1093/ejo/25.3.301 ↗
6. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance: A cephalometric investigation10.1016/0002-9416(79)90227-6 ↗
7. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes
8. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects10.1093/ejo/cji116 ↗
9. Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment10.1093/ejo/10.1.149 ↗
10. Effect of the MARA appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion10.1007/s00056-007-0656-7 ↗
11. Analysis of Class II patients, successfully treated with the straight-wire and Forsus appliances, based on cervical vertebral maturation status10.2319/102513-780.1 ↗
12. Comparison between an acrylic splint Herbst and an acrylic splint miniscrew-Herbst for mandibular incisors proclination control10.1155/2014/173187 ↗
13. Herbst appliance anchored to miniscrews with 2 types of ligation: Effectiveness in skeletal Class II treatment10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.029 ↗
14. Herbst appliance anchored to miniscrews in the upper and lower arches vs standard Herbst: A pilot study10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.11.015 ↗
15. Influence of incisor position control on the mandibular response in growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.014 ↗
16. Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion10.2319/051314-345.1 ↗
17. Treatment outcomes of Class II malocclusion cases treated with miniscrew-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial10.2319/032717-214.1 ↗
18. Anchorage loss due to Herbst mechanism-preventable through miniscrews?10.1093/ejo/cju058 ↗
19. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.020 ↗
20. Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types: A pilot study10.1007/s00056-016-0020-x ↗
21. Three-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment10.1111/ocr.12154 ↗
22. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: A cephalometric and tomographic investigation10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.030 ↗
23. Mini-implants and the efficiency of Herbst treatment: A preliminary study10.1186/2196-1042-14-21 ↗
24. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial10.1186/s13063-017-2297-5 ↗
25. Palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs): What to know and how to do?10.1111/ocr.12451 ↗