Stochastic Generator of Earthquakes for Mainland France
Source abstract
Abstract
Mainland France is characterized by low-to-moderate seismic activity, yet it is known that major earthquakes could strike this territory (e.g., Liguria in 1887 or Basel in 1356). Assessing this French seismic hazard is thus necessary in order to support building codes and to lead prevention actions towards the population. The Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA) is the classical approach used to estimate the seismic hazard. One way to apply PSHA is to generate synthetic earthquakes by propagating information from past seismicity and building various seismic scenarios. In this paper, we present an implementation of a stochastic generator of earthquakes and discuss its relevance to mimic the seismicity of low-to-moderate seismic areas. The proposed stochastic generator produces independent events (main shocks) and their correlated seismicity (only aftershocks). Main shocks are simulated first in time and magnitude considering all available data in the area, and then localized in space with the use of a probability map and regionalization. Aftershocks are simulated around main shocks by considering both the seismic moment ratio and distribution of the aftershock’s proportion. The generator is tested with mainland France data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: earthquake and tectonic studies · Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
GeoRessources, ASGA, CNRS, Université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France
Caisse Centrale de Réassurance, R&D Modélisation, 75008 Paris, France
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Rey, J., and Tinard, P. (2017). Partenariat CCR-BRGM 2014-2019, Travaux Menés en 2017 dans le cadre du Programme Commun sur le Risque Sismique, Technical Report BRGM/RP-68082-FR.
2. Rey, J., and Tinard, P. (December, January 30). Estimation financière du risque sismique à l’échelle départementale: À l’interface entre sismologie et réassurance, travaux communs CCR-BRGM (2014–2019). Proceedings of the 9ème Colloque de l’AFPS: AFPS15, Anticiper, Limiter, Gérer les Effets des Séismes Dans Les Territoires, Marne-La-Vallée, France.
3. Rey, J., and Tinard, P. (2016). Partenariat CCR-BRGM 2014-2019, Travaux Menés en 2016 dans le Cadre du Programme Commun sur le Risque Sismique, Technical Report BRGM/RP-66473-FR.
4. Mouroux, P., Le Brun, B., Depinois, S., Bertrand, E., and Masure, P. (2004). Projet Européen RISK-UE: Application à la Ville de Nice, Technical Report BRGM/RP-53202-FR.
5. Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis10.1785/BSSA0580051583 ↗
6. Determination of Design Earthquakes in Seismic Hazard Analysis Through Monte Carlo Simulation10.1080/13632469909350355 ↗
7. Probabilistic Tsunami Loss Estimation Methodology: Stochastic Earthquake Scenario Approach10.1193/012617eqs019m ↗
8. The Quientessence of 25 Years of Our Contributions to Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering10.1007/s40098-020-00465-9 ↗
9. Probabilistic investigation of the seismic displacement of earth slopes under stochastic ground motion: A rotational sliding block analysis10.1139/cgj-2020-0252 ↗
10. Updated seismotectonic zoning scheme of Metropolitan France, with reference to geologic and seismotectonic data10.2113/gssgfbull.184.3.225 ↗
11. Jacob, K., Armbruster, J., Barstow, N., and Horton, S. (1994, January 10–14). Probabilistic Ground Motion Estimates for New York: Comparison with Design Ground Motions in National and Local Codes. Proceedings of the 5th USA National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Chicago, IL, USA.
12. Kernel Estimation Methods for Seismic Hazard Area Source Modeling10.1785/BSSA0860020353 ↗
13. Toward Physics-Based Nonergodic PSHA: A Prototype Fully Deterministic Seismic Hazard Model for Southern California10.1785/0120200216 ↗
14. Challenges in Assessing Seismic Hazard in Intraplate Europe10.1144/SP432.7 ↗
15. A New Paradigm for Large Earthquakes in Stable Continental Plate Interiors: LARGE EARTHQUAKES IN SCRs10.1002/2016GL070815 ↗
16. Processes and Deformation Rates Generating Seismicity in Metropolitan France and Conterminous Western Europe
17. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for South-Eastern France10.1007/s10518-017-0249-9 ↗
18. Guyonnet-Benaize, C. (2011). Modélisation 3D Multi-Échelle Des Structures Géologiques de La Région de La Faille de La Moyenne Durance (SE France). [Ph.D. Thesis, Aix–Marseille 1].
19. Three-dimensional structural modeling of an active fault zone based on complex outcrop and subsurface data: The Middle Durance Fault Zone inherited from polyphase Meso-Cenozoic tectonics (southeastern France)10.1002/2014TC003749 ↗
20. Previously Unknown Fault Shakes New Zealand’s South Island10.1029/2010EO490001 ↗
21. 2000 Years of Migrating Earthquakes in North China: How Earthquakes in Midcontinents Differ from Those at Plate Boundaries10.1130/L129.1 ↗
22. Surface Rupture and Shallow Fault Reactivation during the 2019 Mw 4.9 Le Teil Earthquake, France10.1038/s43247-020-0012-z ↗
23. Quigley, M., King, T., and Clark, D. (2020, January 4–8). The 2016 Mw 6.1 Petermann Ranges earthquake rupture, Australia: Another “one-off” stable continental region earthquake. Proceedings of the EGU 2020, Vienna, Austria.10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-12723 ↗
24. New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement10.1785/BSSA0840040974 ↗
25. Self-Consistent Earthquake Fault-Scaling Relations: Update and Extension to Stable Continental Strike-Slip Faults10.1785/0120140087 ↗
26. Aftershocks’ Effect on Structural Design Actions in Italy
27. Statistical Models for Earthquake Occurrences and Residual Analysis for Point Processes10.1080/01621459.1988.10478560 ↗
28. Richter, C.F. (1958). Elementaty Seismology. Publisher: W.F. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, and Bailey Bros, Swinfen Ltd.
29. Lateral Inhomogeneities of the Upper Mantle10.1016/0040-1951(65)90003-X ↗
30. Seismic Moment Ratio of Aftershocks with Respect to Main Shocks: Seismic Moment Ratio of Aftershocks10.1002/2013JB010191 ↗
31. The SHARE Consortium. The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: Key components and results10.1007/s10518-015-9795-1 ↗
32. Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe10.1007/s10950-012-9281-z ↗
33. The French Seismic CATalogue (FCAT-17)10.1007/s10518-017-0236-1 ↗
34. A Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map for the Metropolitan France10.1007/s10518-020-00790-7 ↗
35. SI-Hex: A New Catalogue of Instrumental Seismicity for Metropolitan France10.2113/gssgfbull.186.1.3 ↗
36. Completeness analysis of a seismic catalog
37. An improved method for the analysis of the completeness of a seismic catalogue10.1007/BF02739471 ↗
38. Frequency of Earthquakes in California10.1785/BSSA0340040185 ↗
39. Is Sequence of Earthquakes in Southern California, with Aftershocks Removed, Poissonian?10.1785/BSSA0640051363 ↗
40. Grünthal, G. (1985, January 17–22). The Up-Dated Earthquake Catalogue for the German Democratic Republic and Adjacent Areas–Statistical Data Characteristics and Conclusions for Hazard Assessment. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Analysis of Seismicity and Seismic Risk, Prague, Czechoslovakia.
41. Cornell, A., and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1969, January 13–18). The Major Influences on Seismic Risk. Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
42. A Moment Magnitude Scale10.1029/JB084iB05p02348 ↗
43. The Influence of Source-and Ground-Motion Model Choices on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Levels at 6 Sites in France10.1007/s10518-020-00879-z ↗
44. Ameri, G., Baumont, D., Gomes, C., Le Dortz, K., Le, B., Martin, C., Secanell, R., and Vanmarcke, E.H. (December, January 30). On the Choice of Maximum Earthquake Magnitude for Seismic Hazard Assessment in Metropolitan France–Insight from the Bayesian Approach. Proceedings of the 9ème Colloque National de l’AFPS: AFPS15, Anticiper, Limiter, gérer les Effets des Séismes Dans les Territoires, Marne-La-Vallée, France.
45. Zentner, I. (2018). Bayesian Estimation of the Maximum Magnitude Mmax Based on the Statistics of Extremes, SIGMA. Technical Report SIGMA-2-2018-D5-004.
46. Helmstetter, A., and Sornette, D. (2003). Importance of Direct and Indirect Triggered Seismicity in the ETAS Model of Seismicity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30.10.1029/2003GL017670 ↗
47. Aftershocks and Earthquake Statistics(1): Some Parameters Which Characterize an Aftershock Sequence and Their Interrelations
48. Probabilistic seismic hazard estimation in low-seismicity regions considering non-Poissonian seismic occurrence10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02863.x ↗
49. Vannucci, G., Imprescia, P., and Gasperini, P. (2009, January 19–24). Earthquake Mechanisms of the Mediterranean Area (EMMA) Version 3: An Improved Tool for Characterizing the Tectonic Deformation Styles in the Mediterranean. Proceedings of the EGU 2009, Vienna, Austria.
50. Heidbach, O., Barth, A., Müller, B., Reinecker, J., Stephansson, O., Tingay, M., and Zang, A. (2016). WSM Quality Ranking Scheme, Database Description and Analysis Guidelines for Stress Indicator, World Stress Map. Technical Report 16-01.