journal article·2021-11-24Open access

Effects of Strong Ground Motion with Identical Response Spectra and Different Duration on Pile Support Mechanism and Seismic Resistance of Spherical Gas Holders on Soft Ground

Mio Kobayashi, Toshihiro Noda, Kentaro Nakai, Toshihiro Takaine, Akira Asaoka

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 23

Abstract

Safety measures are required for spherical gas holders to prevent them from malfunctioning even after a large earthquake. In this study, considering the strong nonlinearity of the ground and damage to the pile during an earthquake, a three-dimensional seismic response analysis of the holder–pile–ground interaction system was conducted for an actual gas holder on the soft ground consisting of alternating layers of sand and clay. In the analysis, the seismic response of the structure to strong ground motions of different durations with the same acceleration response spectrum was verified. The results show that the piles were relatively effective in controlling the settlement when the duration of the earthquake motion was long. This is because the axial force acting on the pile increased due to the redistribution of the holder load caused by the lowering of the effective confining pressure of the sand and clay layers during the earthquake, which increased the bearing capacity of the pile. In contrast, when the duration of the seismic motion was short, the piles had little effect on the reduction in the settlement because the maximum acceleration was higher than that in the former case, and the piles immediately lost their support function.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd., 1-5-20 Kaigan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8527, Japan

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

GEOASIA Research Society, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

Association for the Development of Earthquake Prediction, 1-5-18 Sarugaku-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0064, Japan

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Tokyo Metropolitan Government (2016). Tokyo Metropolitan Land Resilience Regional Plan, (In Japanese).
2. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2021). White Paper on Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism in Japan, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. (In Japanese).
3. Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750) ↗
4. Turner, B.J., Brandenberg, S.J., and Stewart, J.P. (2017). Influence of Kinematic SSI on Foundation Input Motions for Bridges on Deep Foundations, University of California. PEER Report of Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center No.2017/08.
5. Nonlinear soil-pile interaction model for dynamic lateral motion10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:1(89) ↗
6. Miyamoto, Y. (2001, January 6–8). Pile response during earthquake and performance evaluation of pile foundation. Proceedings of the 2nd U.S.-Japan Workshop on Soil-Structure Interaction, Tsukuba, Japan. Paper No. B-6.
7. Seismic evaluations of pile foundations with three different methods based on three-dimensional elasto-plastic finite element analysis10.3208/sandf.40.5_113 ↗
8. Dynamic collapse mechanism and ultimate strength for circular tube pile based on centrifuge tests of superstructure-pile-liquefied soil system10.3130/aijs.81.2079 ↗
9. The flexural strength and deformation characteristics of precast concrete piles for estimation of seismic performance against severe earthquakes10.3130/aijt.21.95 ↗
10. Tombari, A., Dezi, F., and El Naggar, M.H. (2012, January 24–28). Soil-pile-structure interaction under seismic loads: Influence of ground motion intensity, duration and non-linearity. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal. Paper No.5271.
11. Soil-water coupled finite deformation analysis based on a rate-type equation of motion incorporating the SYS Cam-clay model10.3208/sandf.48.771 ↗
12. An elasto-plastic description of two distinct volume change mechanisms of soils10.3208/sandf.42.5_47 ↗
13. D seismic response analysis of a spherical gas holder on a sandy ground considering a serious scenario by the greatest possible earthquake
14. Kobayashi, M., and Takaine, T. (2019, January 14–18). Earthquake resistance evaluation of a spherical gas holder considering its ultimate state due to liquefaction-induced differential settlement of sandy ground. Proceedings of the 16th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
15. Japan Gas Association (2014). Seismic Design Guidelines for Manufacturing Equipment, Japan Gas Association. (In Japanese).
16. Analytical study on soil liquefaction due to long duration earthquakes with low acceleration
17. Japanese Geotechnical Society (2014, January 14–15). Report of the ground deformation research committee. Proceedings of the JGS Special Symposium–Overcoming the Great East Japan Earthquake, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese).
18. Development of vibration control for boiler structure of coal-fired power plant with earthquake having long period component and long duration
19. Zama, S. (2004, January 25–29). Liquid Sloshing of Oil Storage Tanks and Long-Period Strong Ground Motions in the 2003 Tokachi-Oki Earthquake. Proceedings of the ASME/JSME 2004 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Storage Tank Integrity and Materials Evaluation, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1115/PVP2004-3076 ↗
20. Lessons from the 2003 Tokachi-oki, Japan, earthquake for prediction of long-period strong ground motions and sloshing damage to oil storage tanks10.1007/s10950-007-9066-y ↗
21. Spencer, B.F., and Hu, Y.X. (2001). Earthquake damage and countermeasure of industrial lifeline and equipment. Earthquake Engineering Frontiers in the New Millennium, Routledge. [1st ed.].
22. Co-seismic and post-seismic behavior of an alternately layered sand-clay ground and embankment system accompanied by soil disturbance10.3208/sandf.49.739 ↗
23. Some bearing capacity characteristics of a structured naturally deposited clay soil10.3208/sandf.47.285 ↗
24. Ground improvement of intermediate reclaimed land by compaction through cavity expansion of sand piles10.3208/sandf.48.653 ↗
25. Schnabel, P.B., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H.B. (1972). SHAKE—A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites, University of California. Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. EERC 72-12.
26. Effects of changes in geometry on the linear elastic consolidation deformation10.3208/sandf.37.29 ↗
27. 3-dimensional effective stress analysis of a damaged group-pile foundation adjacent to a quay wall10.5610/jaee.2.2_1 ↗
28. Toyo Asano Concrete Industry, Co., Ltd. (1970). Design Materials (PHC Pile/PC Pile), Toyo Asano Concrete Industry Co., Ltd.. (In Japanese).
29. (2021, October 03). Strong-Motion Earthquake Observation in Japanese Ports. Available online: http://www.mlit.go.jp/kowan/kyosin/eq.htm.
30. Public Works Research Institute (1995). Acceleration Strong-Motion Records in Civil Engineering Structures (No. 21), Public Works Research Institute. (In Japanese).
31. Bolt, B.A. (1973, January 25–29). Duration of strong ground motion. Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Italy.
32. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion
33. A statistical analysis of duration and its related parameters with emphasis on soil conditions
34. Finite dynamic model for infinite media10.1061/JMCEA3.0001144 ↗
35. Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes
36. Okada, T., Oniki, K., Kono, T., and Hoshikuma, J. (2015, January 7–8). Positive and negative alternating load test using pre-built RC pile foundation models. Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on Seismic Design of Bridges based on Performance, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese).
37. Research trends on the evaluation of seismic performance of existing bridges and seismic retrofitting