Comparative Study of Dynamic Stall between an Aircraft Airfoil and a Wind Turbine Airfoil in an Air–Particle Flow
Source abstract
Abstract
Dynamic stall in clean air flow has been well studied, but its exploration in air–particle (air–raindrop or air–sand) flow is still lacking. The aerodynamic performance loss of aircraft (NACA0012) and wind turbine (S809) airfoils and their differences during the hysteresis loop at different pitching parameters are also poorly understood. As shown in this paper, the reduced frequency has little effect on the value of the maximum lift coefficient increment caused by particles, but a larger one can enhance the hysteresis effect and drag the angle of attack, at which the maximum increment is obtained, from the up stroke to the down stroke. The large lift coefficient increments of two airfoils and their difference also have a similar change trend with the reduced frequency. Compared to that of NACA0012 airfoil, the increments of S809 airfoil are obviously greater at three mean angles of attack, especially at 8°, which is the commonly used operating angle. In addition, the angle of attack, at which the maximum lift coefficient is obtained, can be significantly changed by particles in two regions: one is under the effect of deep stall, the other is under the effect of light stall at a low, reduced frequency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Wind Energy Research and Development
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing 210016, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Torsional Oscillation of Helicopter Blades Due to Stall10.2514/3.43728 ↗
2. Angle-of Attack Distribution of a High-Speed Helicopter Rotor10.4050/JAHS.12.2.41 ↗
3. An Analysis of the Stall Flutter Instability of Helicopter Rotor Blades10.4050/JAHS.12.4.1 ↗
4. Stall Flutter of Helicopter Rotor Blades: A Special Case of the Dynamic Stall Phenomenon10.4050/JAHS.12.19 ↗
5. Dynamic Stall Considerations in Helicopter Rotors10.4050/JAHS.13.49 ↗
6. Dynamic Stall Experiments on Oscillating Airfoils10.2514/3.61332 ↗
7. An Experimental Study of Dynamic Stall on Advanced Airfoil Section. Volume 2: Pressure and Force Data
8. A Semi-Empirical Model for Dynamic Stall
9. Theoretical and Numerical Studies of Oscillating Airfoils10.2514/3.25260 ↗
10. Investigation of the Unsteady Flow Velocity Field above an Airfoil Pitching under Deep Dynamic Stall Conditions10.1007/BF00193856 ↗
11. Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Dynamic Stall on a Pitching NACA 0012 Airfoil10.2514/3.13177 ↗
12. Investigation of Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall Using Computational Fluid Dynamics10.2514/1.8830 ↗
13. Dynamic Response of Vortex Breakdown Flows to a Pitching Double-Delta Wing10.1016/j.ast.2017.10.008 ↗
14. Correlations of Unsteady Vortex Burst Point and Dynamic Stability over a Pitching Double-delta Wing10.1016/j.ast.2020.106256 ↗
15. Dynamic Lift Characteristics of Nonslender Delta Wing in Large-amplitude-pitching10.1016/j.ast.2020.105937 ↗
16. Hu, T., Zhao, Y., Liu, P., Qu, Q., Guo, H., and Akkermans, R.A. (2021). Investigation on Lift Characteristics of a Double-delta Wing Pitching in Various Reduced Frequencies. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part. G J. Aerosp. Eng.10.1177/0954410021992201 ↗
17. Butterfield, C.P., Simms, D., Scott, G., and Hansen, A.C. (1991, January 1). Dynamic Stall on Wind Turbine Blades. Proceedings of the American Wind Energy Association Conference: Windpower ‘91, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
18. Shipley, D.E., Miller, M.S., and Robinson, M.C. (1995). Dynamic Stall Occurrence on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports.
19. Ramsay, R.F., Hoffman, M.J., and Gregorek, G.M. (1995). Effects of Grit Roughness and Pitch Oscillations on the S809 Airfoil, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports.10.2172/205563 ↗
20. Computational Prediction of Airfoil Dynamic Stall10.1016/S0376-0421(97)00012-2 ↗
21. Dynamic Stall Model for Wind Turbine Airfoils10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.02.005 ↗
22. A Modified Dynamic Stall Model for Low Mach Numbers
23. Leading-Edge Flow Structure of a Dynamically Pitching NACA 0012 Airfoil10.2514/1.J051673 ↗
24. An Improved Dynamic Stall Model and Its Effect on Wind Turbine Fatigue Load Prediction10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.040 ↗
25. Numerical Simulation of the Dynamic Stall of a NACA 0012 Airfoil Using DES and Advanced OES/URANS modelling10.1007/978-3-540-77815-8_28 ↗
26. Turbulence Modelling of the Flow Past a Pitching NACA0012 Airfoil at Formula Not Shown and Formula Not Shown Reynolds Numbers10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.08.002 ↗
27. Guntur, S., Schreck, S., Sorensen, N.N., Schreck, S., and Bergami, L. (2015). Modeling Dynamic Stall on Wind Turbine Blades Under Rotationally Augmented Flow Fields, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Technical Report.10.2172/1215179 ↗
28. Zhu, C., Wang, T., and Zhong, W. (2019). Combined Effect of Rotational Augmentation and Dynamic Stall on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12081434 ↗
29. Experimental Investigation of Dynamic Stall Flow Control for Wind Turbine Airfoils Using a Plasma Actuator10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.017 ↗
30. Large Eddy Simulation of Dynamic Stall Flow Control for Wind Turbine Airfoil Using Plasma Actuator10.1016/j.energy.2020.118753 ↗
31. Dynamic Stall Control of the Wind Turbine Airfoil via Single-row and Double-row Passive Vortex Generators10.1016/j.energy.2019.116272 ↗
32. Dynamic Stall of the Wind Turbine Airfoil and Blade Undergoing Pitch Oscillations: A Comparative Study10.1016/j.energy.2021.120004 ↗
33. He, T. (2017). Study the Dynamic Stall Characteristics of Wind Turbine Airfoil under Sand-wind Environment, Lanzhou University of Technology.
34. Guo, T., Jin, J., Lu, Z., Zhou, D., and Wang, T. (2019). Aerodynamic Sensitivity Analysis for a Wind Turbine Airfoil in an Air-Particle Two-Phase Flow. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183909 ↗
35. Two-equation Eddy-viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
36. A Correlation-Based Transition Model Using Local Variables-Part I: Model Formulation10.1115/1.2184352 ↗
37. Comparative Study of Dynamic Stall under Pitch Oscillation and Oscillating Freestream on Wind Turbine Airfoil and Blade10.3390/app8081242 ↗
38. ANSYS Inc. (2015). FLUENT Theory Guide, Release 16.0, ANSYS Inc.
39. An Investigation of Particle Trajectories in Two-Phase Flow Systems10.1017/S0022112072001806 ↗
40. Hand, M.M., Simms, D.A., Fingersh, L.J., Jager, D.W., Cotrell, J.R., Schreck, S., and Larwood, S.M. (2001). Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase VI: Wind Tunnel Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.10.2172/15000240 ↗
41. Somers, D.M. (1997). Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.10.2172/437668 ↗
42. Experimental Study of Flow Characteristics in the Near Field of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Circular Cylinder Wakes