journal article·2021-10-16Open access

Acoustic Impact of Hybrid-Electric DEP Aircraft Configuration at Airport Level

Adolfo Sollazzo, Francesco Petrosino, Luciano De Vivo, Antonio Visingardi, Mattia Barbarino

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 20

Abstract

The Italian research project PROSIB (PROpulsione e Sistemi IBridi per velivoli ad ala fissa e rotante), is a 30-month initiative funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research (MIUR) and coordinated by the Leonardo company. The project is aimed to investigate configurations for regional aircraft and rotary wing platforms and architectures for propulsion systems, and is dedicated to the identification of the best strategy for their use, given different on-board energy sources. The reduced environmental impact is the key for the success of the new hybrid/electric aircraft configurations. This not only considers the chemical pollution introduced in the atmosphere, but also the noise produced on the surrounding area of airports. The present paper describes the acoustic impact assessment resulting from the inclusion of new propulsion technologies and new configurations of regional aircraft (ATR42 pax) in a reference airport area.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CIRA, Italian Aerospace Research Center, Via Maiorise, 81043 Capua, CE, Italy

Funding

Ministry of Education, Universities and Research

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. PROSIB—Capitolato Tecnico ARS01_00297 (2018). Propulsione E Sistemi Ibridi per Velivoli ad Ala Fissa E Rotante, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca.
2. Aversano, R., Bianco, D., De Vivo, L., Sollazzo, A., Barbarino, M., and Federico, L. Acoustical Characterization of the F-35A Joint Strike Fighter: Results and Perspectives of the First Experimental Campaign, Institute of Noise Control Engineering. Available online: http://www.sea-acustica.es/fileadmin/INTERNOISE_2019/Fchrs/Proceedings/2003.pdf.
3. SAE (2012). Procedure for the Calculation of Airplane Noise in the Vicinity of Airports, SAE International. SAE AIR 1845A.
4. (2021, January 11). ICAO Annex 16 Vol. 1 “Aircraft Noise”. Available online: https://store.icao.int/en/annex-16-environmental-protection-volume-i-aircraft-noise.
5. Visingardi, A., D’Alascio, A., Pagano, A., and Renzoni, P. Validation of CIRA’s Rotorcraft Aerodynamic Modelling SYStem with DNW Experimental Data. Proceedings of the 22nd European Rotorcraft Forum, Brighton, UK. Available online: https://dspace-erf.nlr.nl/xmlui/handle/20.500.11881/3171.
6. Visingardi, A., Dummel, A., Falchero, D., Pidd, M., Voutsinas, S.G., and Yin, J. (2006, January 12–14). Aerodynamic interference in full helicopter configurations: Validation using the HeliNOVI database. Proceedings of the 32nd European Rotorcraft Forum, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11881/1080.
7. De Gregorio, F., Visingardi, A., and Iuso, G. (2021). An Experimental-Numerical Investigation of the Wake Structure of a Hovering Rotor by PIV Combined with a G2 Vortex Detection Criterion. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14092613 ↗
8. Numerical Analysis of Airframe Noise Scattering Effects in Tilt Rotor Systems
9. Morino, L. (2021, January 13). A General Theory of Unsteady Compressible Potential Aerodynamics. NASA CR-2464, Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750004821.
10. An advanced time approach for acoustic analogy predictions10.1016/S0022-460X(02)00986-0 ↗
11. Tonal and Broadband Noise Calculations for Aeroacoustic Optimization of a Pusher Propeller
12. Simulation of Helicopter Community Noise in Complex Urban Geometry10.2514/1.J050774 ↗
13. A High-Fidelity Aeroacoustic Simulation of a VTOL Aircraft in an Urban Air Mobility Scenario
14. (2021, January 13). UNI-ISO 9613-2:2006. Acoustics—Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors—Part 2: General Method of Calculation. Available online: http://store.uni.com/catalogo/norme/root-categorie-ics/17/17-140/17-140-01/uni-iso-9613-2-2006.
15. ICAO (2021, January 18). Doc 9501. Environmental Technical Manual: Volume I—Procedures for the Noise Certification of Aircraft. Available online: https://store.icao.int/en/environmental-technical-manual-volume-1-procedures-for-the-noise-certification-of-aircraft-doc-9501-1.
16. SAE (1975). Standard Values of Atmospheric Absorption as a Function of Temperature and Humidity, SAE International.
17. De Vivo, L. (2020). Model for Aircraft Noise Impact Analysis in a Reference Airport, PROSIB Project, Deliverable D3.3.2.
18. (2021, January 18). Legge 26 Ottobre 1995, n. 447 “Legge Quadro sull’Inquinamento Acustico”. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/1995/10/30/095G0477/sg.
19. (2021, January 18). Decreto Ministeriale 31 Ottobre 1997 “Metodologia di Misura del Rumore Aeroportuale”. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/1997/11/15/097A9090/sg.
20. (2021, January 18). Decreto Legislativo 194/2005 “Attuazione Della Direttiva 2002/49/CE Relativa Alla Determinazione e Alla Gestione del Rumore Ambientale”. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2005/10/13/05A09688/sg.
21. Crocker, M.J. (2007). Handbook of Noise and Vibration Control, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470209707 ↗
22. (2020). University of Napoli, Leonardo Divisione Velivoli, PROSIB D2.1.5—Progetto preliminare e MDO velivolo motorizzazione 2, PROSIB project.
23. Pagano, A. (2019). Progetto e Verifica Elica per Velivoli con Ala Convenzionale della Classe ATR42-Ottimizzazione Elica—Design and Verification of Propellers for Conventional Wings of the ATR42 Aircraft Class—Propeller Optimization (in Italian), PROSIB project, deliverable D2.1.2.