journal article·2021-08-09Open access

A Variation Reduction in the Tele-Abrasive System: A Study of Human Movement

Ranon Jientrakul, Chumpol Yuangyai, Supapan Chaiprapat

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 16

Abstract

In a tele-abrasive task, it is principally human arm movements that cause variation in the position of the abrasive nozzle, thereby resulting in high operating costs and low productivity. It is difficult to design a system that can minimize the variation that accrues from operators behaving differently, which is difficult to predict. Although skilled operators can reduce this variation, becoming a skillful operator requires a lengthy training period. In this work, a two-stage variation streaming technique was used to extract variation sources in a tele-abrasive system. Furthermore, we propose an integrated human–computer approach to control variation in these systems—an approach that applies an innovative human arm movement pattern incorporated with a Kalman filter into a standard system. A virtual tele-abrasive system was used to validate our approach. Furthermore, compared with conventional systems, the proposed approach will help operators to perform abrasive tasks more comfortably and require a shorter training period.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques · Iterative Learning Control Systems · Teleoperation and Haptic Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand

Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, Hat-Yai 90110, Thailand

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Development of a robotic bridge maintenance system10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00040-0 ↗
2. Human–robot–environment interaction interface for robotic grit-blasting of complex steel bridges10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.014 ↗
3. Sitti, M., and Hashimoto, H. (1998, January 17). Telenanorobotics using atomic force microscope. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, BC, Canada.
4. Penin, L. (, January December). Teleoperation with time delay: A survey and its issue in space robotics. Proceedings of the 6th ESA Workshop Advanced Space Technology for Robotics Automation, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
5. Hirche, S., Stanczyk, B., and Buss, M. (, 2003). Transparent Exploration of Remote Environments by Internet Telepresence. Proceedings of the International Workshop on High-Fidelity Telepresence and Teleaction jointly with the conference HUMANOIDS, Munich, Germany. Available online: https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1168880?show_id=1188608.
6. Kron, A., Schmidt, G., Petzold, B., Zah, M.F., Hinterseer, P., and Steinbach, E. (May, January 26). Disposal of explosive ordinances by use of a bimanual haptic telepresence system. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Orleans, LA, USA.
7. Task performance evaluation of asymmetric semiautonomous teleoperation of mobile twin-arm robotic manipulators10.1109/TOH.2013.23 ↗
8. Projection-based force-reflection algorithms with frequency separation for bilateral teleoperation10.1109/TMECH.2014.2307334 ↗
9. Machine-vision-based teleoperation aid10.1016/S0736-5853(05)80062-0 ↗
10. Chang, Y., Yang, C., and Lin, H. (2018, January 13–17). Adaptive control for bilateral teleoperation systems with time-varying delays. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention, Chiba, Japan.10.1109/ICASI.2018.8394475 ↗
11. Robot calibration using a portable photogrammetry system10.1016/j.rcim.2017.05.004 ↗
12. Control of human arm movement in machine-human cooperative welding process10.1016/j.conengprac.2014.08.003 ↗
13. Jientrakul, R., and Yuangyai, C. (2016, January 19–22). Minimizing multi-stage system variation using Kalman filter for a tele-sandblasting system. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT), Bangkok, Thailand.10.1109/ICMIT.2016.7605021 ↗
14. Investigating multiple human performance measures in teleoperation task: A translation task in a tele-sandblasting maintenance system
15. Model study on the traceability of the accuracy of an industrial manipulator to an external measurement system based on the Banach fixed-point theorem10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.04.004 ↗
16. Machine assisted manual torch operation: System design, response modeling, and speed control10.1007/s10845-015-1047-3 ↗
17. Jientrakul, R., and Chotiprayanakul, P. (2017, January 23–25). Accuracy Improvement in Two-Dimensional Coordinate Mapping: A Parallel Robot for Engineering Laboratory. Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Multimedia and Communication Technology, Ayutthaya, Thailand.
18. Effect of handle design on movement dynamics and muscle co-activation in a wrist flexion task10.1016/j.ergon.2016.10.001 ↗
19. Variation modeling for a sheet stretch forming manufacturing system10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63211-9 ↗
20. Huang, W., Zhou, N., and Shi, J. (2000, January 5–10). Stream of variation modeling and diagnosis of multi-station machining processes. Proceedings of the 2000 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1115/IMECE2000-1793 ↗
21. Linear state space modeling of dimensional machining errors
22. State space modeling of dimensional variation propagation in multistage machining process using differential motion vectors10.1109/TRA.2003.808852 ↗
23. Yield improvement for lost mould rapid infiltration forming process by a multistage fractional factorial split plot design10.1504/IJNM.2009.027501 ↗
24. Understanding multistage experiments10.1504/IJEDPO.2013.059652 ↗
25. Shi, J. (2007). Stream of Variation Modeling and Analysis for Multistage Manufacturing Process, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420003901 ↗
26. Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S., and Wu, Y. (2005). Part III: Quality Loss Function Taguchi’s Quality Engineering Handbook, John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9780470258354 ↗
27. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems, Transaction of the ASME10.1115/1.3662552 ↗
28. Jientrakul, R., Limnararat, S., Yuangyai, C., Srisuebsai, W., and Chotiprayanakul, P. (2015, January 8–11). Investigating of human-robot collaboration in a mixed-reality tele-sandblasting maintenance system. Proceedings of the 16th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
29. Huang, J., Kosaka, S., Imamura, Y., and Yabuta, T. (2007, January 22–26). Measurement of distance error in reaching movement of the human hand without using vision. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France.10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353430 ↗
30. Kalman filter with both adaptivity and robustness10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.12.017 ↗
31. An advanced Kalman filter for gaze tracking signal10.1016/j.bspc.2015.11.009 ↗
32. Characterizing efficiency of human robot interaction: A case study of shared-control teleoperation
33. A policy-blending formalism for shared control10.1177/0278364913490324 ↗
34. Continuous-Time Norm-Constrainted Kalman Filtering10.1016/j.automatica.2014.08.007 ↗
35. Prediction-based data aggregation in wireless sensor networks: Combining grey model and Kalman Filter10.1016/j.comcom.2010.10.003 ↗
36. Passive Position Location Estimation Using the Extended Kalman Filter10.1109/TAES.1987.310889 ↗
37. UAV Position Estimation and Collision Avoidance Using the Extended Kalman Filter10.1109/TVT.2013.2243480 ↗