journal article·2021-07-25Open access

Arthroscope Localization in 3D Ultrasound Volumes Using Weakly Supervised Deep Learning

Jeroen M. A. van der Burgt, Saskia M. Camps, Maria Antico, Gustavo Carneiro, Davide Fontanarosa

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 15

Abstract

This work presents an algorithm based on weak supervision to automatically localize an arthroscope on 3D ultrasound (US). The ultimate goal of this application is to combine 3D US with the 2D arthroscope view during knee arthroscopy, to provide the surgeon with a comprehensive view of the surgical site. The implemented algorithm consisted of a weakly supervised neural network, which was trained on 2D US images of different phantoms mimicking the imaging conditions during knee arthroscopy. Image-based classification was performed and the resulting class activation maps were used to localize the arthroscope. The localization performance was evaluated visually by three expert reviewers and by the calculation of objective metrics. Finally, the algorithm was also tested on a human cadaver knee. The algorithm achieved an average classification accuracy of 88.6% on phantom data and 83.3% on cadaver data. The localization of the arthroscope based on the class activation maps was correct in 92–100% of all true positive classifications for both phantom and cadaver data. These results are relevant because they show feasibility of automatic arthroscope localization in 3D US volumes, which is paramount to combining multiple image modalities that are available during knee arthroscopies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Iabsis Sarl, 1218 Geneva, Switzerland

EBAMed SA, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland

Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Australian Institute for Machine Learning, School of Computer Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Funding

Australia-India Strategic Research Fund · Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Orthopaedic Surgeon Attitudes towards Current Limitations and the Potential for Robotic and Technological Innovation in Arthroscopic Surgery10.1177/2309499016684993 ↗
2. Major Vascular Injuries Complicating Knee Arthroscopy10.5114/wiitm.2015.52559 ↗
3. Cartilage Injuries: A Review of 31,516 Knee Arthroscopies10.1016/S0749-8063(97)90124-9 ↗
4. Complications in Knee Arthroscopy10.1007/s00167-005-0694-x ↗
5. Ultrasound Guidance in Minimally Invasive Robotic Procedures10.1016/j.media.2019.01.002 ↗
6. Abedin-Nasab, M.H. (2020). 29–Robotic and Image-Guided Knee Arthroscopy. Handbook of Robotic and Image-Guided Surgery, Elsevier.
7. Aboofazeli, M., Abolmaesumi, P., Mousavi, P., and Fichtinger, G. (July, January 28). A New Scheme for Curved Needle Segmentation in Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Images. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193240 ↗
8. Cao, K., Mills, D., and Patwardhan, K. (2013, January 7–11). Automated Catheter Detection in Volumetric Ultrasound. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2013.6556406 ↗
9. Parallel Integral Projection Transform for Straight Electrode Localization in 3-D Ultrasound Images10.1109/TUFFC.2008.833 ↗
10. Zhou, H., Qiu, W., Ding, M., and Zhang, S. (2008, January 17). Automatic Needle Segmentation in 3D Ultrasound Images Using 3D Improved Hough Transform. Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging Parallel Process Images, Optimization Technique MIPPR, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1117/12.749339 ↗
11. A Real-Time Biopsy Needle Segmentation Technique Using Hough Transform10.1118/1.1591192 ↗
12. Pourtaherian, A., Zinger, S., With, P., Korsten, H., and Mihajlovic, N. (2015, January 18). Benchmarking of State-of-the-Art Needle Detection Algorithms in 3D Ultrasound Data Volumes. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2015: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.2081800 ↗
13. Frangi, R., Niessen, W.J., Vincken, K., and Viergever, M. (2000). Multiscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer.
14. Line Filtering for Surgical Tool Localization in 3D Ultrasound Images10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.09.020 ↗
15. Pourtaherian, A., Scholten, H., Kusters, L., Zinger, S., Mihajlovic, N., Kolen, A., Zou, F., Ng, G., Korsten, H., and With, P. (2017). Medical Instrument Detection in 3-Dimensional Ultrasound Data Volumes. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging.10.1109/TMI.2017.2692302 ↗
16. Pourtaherian, A., Ghazvinian Zanjani, F., Zinger, S., Mihajlovic, N., Ng, G., Korsten, H., and With, P. (2018). Robust and Semantic Needle Detection in 3D Ultrasound Using Orthogonal-Plane Convolutional Neural Networks. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., 13.10.1007/s11548-018-1798-3 ↗
17. Yang, H., Shan, C., Kolen, A., and With, P. (2018, January 7–10). Catheter Detection in 3D Ultrasound Using Triplanar-Based Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Athens, Greece.10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451586 ↗
18. Deep Learning-Based Digitization of Prostate Brachytherapy Needles in Ultrasound Images10.1002/mp.14508 ↗
19. Multi-Needle Localization with Attention U-Net in US-Guided HDR Prostate Brachytherapy10.1002/mp.14128 ↗
20. Yang, H., Shan, C., Kolen, A., and With, P. (2020). Medical Instrument Detection in Ultrasound-Guided Interventions: A Review. arXiv.
21. Robust Real-Time Needle Tracking in 2-D Ultrasound Images Using Statistical Filtering10.1109/TCST.2016.2587733 ↗
22. Alsbeih, D., Douad, M.I., Al-Tamimi, A.-K., and Al-Jarrah, M.A. (2020, January 27–29). A Dynamic System for Tracking Biopsy Needle in Two Dimensional Ultrasound Images. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 5th Middle East and Africa Conference on Biomedical Engineering (MECBME), Amman, Jordan.10.1109/MECBME47393.2020.9265166 ↗
23. Desai, P., and Hacihaliloglu, I. (2019). Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound. J. Imaging, 5.10.3390/jimaging5040043 ↗
24. Ultrasound Imaging and Segmentation of Bone Surfaces: A Review10.1142/S2339547817300049 ↗
25. A Brief Introduction to Weakly Supervised Learning10.1093/nsr/nwx106 ↗
26. Weakly Supervised Learning of Placental Ultrasound Images with Residual Networks
27. Going to Extremes: Weakly Supervised Medical Image Segmentation10.3390/make3020026 ↗
28. Shin, S., Lee, S., Yun, I., and Lee, K. (2017). Joint Weakly and Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Localization and Classification of Masses in Breast Ultrasound Images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging.
29. An Interpretable Classifier for High-Resolution Breast Cancer Screening Images Utilizing Weakly Supervised Localization10.1016/j.media.2020.101908 ↗
30. van Sloun, R., and Demi, L. (2019). Localizing B-Lines in Lung Ultrasonography by Weakly-Supervised Deep Learning, in-Vivo Results. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.10.1109/JBHI.2019.2936151 ↗
31. Weakly-Supervised Learning for Lung Carcinoma Classification Using Deep Learning10.1038/s41598-020-66333-x ↗
32. Weakly Supervised Object Detection with 2D and 3D Regression Neural Networks10.1016/j.media.2020.101767 ↗
33. Demiray, B., Rackerseder, J., Bozhinoski, S., and Navab, N. (2019). Weakly-Supervised White and Grey Matter Segmentation in 3D Brain Ultrasound. arXiv.
34. Huang, G., Liu, Z., van der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K. (2017). Densely Connected Convolutional Networks. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
35. Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, À., Oliva, A., and Torralba, A. (July, January 26). Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
36. Gottschalk, S., Manocha, D., and Lin, M.C. (2000). Collision Queries Using Oriented Bounding Boxes, University of North Carolina.
37. A Novel Phantom for Teaching and Learning Ultrasound-Guided Needle Manipulation10.1016/j.jmu.2013.08.001 ↗
38. A Simple Phantom for Training in Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy Using the Freehand Technique10.7863/jum.1989.8.12.701 ↗
39. Low Cost, Environment-Friendly Ultrasound Phantom for Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: A Novel Model10.5005/jp-journals-10082-02209 ↗
40. 1285: The Feasibility Study of a Low Cost Sono-Guided Phantom Module: Jelly Curd Phantom10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.06.669 ↗
41. Optimization by Simulated Annealing10.1126/science.220.4598.671 ↗
42. Camps, S., Houben, T., Carneiro, G., Edwards, C., Antico, M., Dunnhofer, M., Martens, E.G.H.J., Baeza, J., Vanneste, B., and Van Limbergen, E. (2019). Automatic Quality Assessment of Transperineal Ultrasound Images of the Male Pelvic Region, Using Deep Learning. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 46.10.1109/ULTSYM.2018.8579839 ↗
43. Kingma, D., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv.