journal article·2021-06-01Open access

Learning the Parametric Transfer Function of Unitary Operations for Real-Time Evaluation of Manufacturing Processes Involving Operations Sequencing

Tanguy Loreau, Victor Champaney, Nicolas Hascoët, Philippe Mourgue, Jean-Louis Duval, Francisco Chinesta

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

For better designing manufacturing processes, surrogate models were widely considered in the past, where the effect of different material and process parameters was considered from the use of a parametric solution. The last contains the solution of the model describing the system under study, for any choice of the selected parameters. These surrogate models, also known as meta-models, virtual charts or computational vademecum, in the context of model order reduction, were successfully employed in a variety of industrial applications. However, they remain confronted to a major difficulty when the number of parameters grows exponentially. Thus, processes involving trajectories or sequencing entail a combinatorial exposition (curse of dimensionality) not only due to the number of possible combinations, but due to the number of parameters needed to describe the process. The present paper proposes a promising route for circumventing, or at least alleviating that difficulty. The proposed technique consists of a parametric transfer function that, as soon as it is learned, allows for, from a given state, inferring the new state after the application of a unitary operation, defined as a step in the sequenced process. Thus, any sequencing can be evaluated almost in real time by chaining that unitary transfer function, whose output becomes the input of the next operation. The benefits and potential of such a technique are illustrated on a problem of industrial relevance, the one concerning the induced deformation on a structural part when printing on it a series of stiffeners.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PIMM, CNRS, ENSAM, HESAM, 151 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France

ESI Group Chair CREATE-ID, ENSAM Institute of Technology, 151 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France

ESI Group, 3bis, Rue Saarinen, CEDEX, 94528 Rungis, France

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. FEM prediction of buckling distortion induced by welding in thin plate panel structures10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.01.003 ↗
2. Effect of welding sequence on residual stress and distortion in flat-bar stiffened plates10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.05.002 ↗
3. Wärmefjord, K., Söderberg, R., and Lindkvist, L. (2010, January 12–18). Strategies for optimization of spot welding sequence with respect to geometrical variation in sheet metal assemblies. Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1115/IMECE2010-38471 ↗
4. Design study for wire and arc additive manufacture10.1504/IJPD.2014.060028 ↗
5. Arc-welding based additive manufacturing for body reinforcement in automotive engineering10.1007/s40194-020-00959-3 ↗
6. PGD-based computational vademecum for efficient design, optimization and control10.1007/s11831-013-9080-x ↗
7. Chinesta, F., Keunings, R., and Leygue, A. (2014). The Proper Generalized Decomposition for Advanced Numerical Simulations: A Primer, Springer. Springer briefs in Applied Sciences and Technology.10.1007/978-3-319-02865-1 ↗
8. Stein, E., de Borst, R., and Hughes, T. (2015). Model Order Reduction. Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. [2nd ed.].
9. Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of nonlinear problems using neural networks10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.037 ↗
10. Pulch, R., and Youssef, M. (2020). Machine learning for trajectories of parametric nonlinear dynamical systems. J. Mach. Learn. Model. Comput., 1.10.1615/JMachLearnModelComput.2020034093 ↗
11. Simple Neural Network Generating an Interactive Memory10.1016/0025-5564(72)90075-2 ↗
12. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data10.1017/S0022112010001217 ↗
13. Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions
14. Singular value decomposition: Application to analysis of experimental data10.1016/0076-6879(92)10010-B ↗
15. Wall, M.E., Rechtsteiner, A., and Rocha, L.M. (2003). Singular value decomposition and principal component analysis. A Practical Approach to Microarray Data Analysis, Springer.10.1007/0-306-47815-3_5 ↗
16. The extraordinary SVD
17. Applications of the dynamic mode decomposition
18. On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications10.3934/jcd.2014.1.391 ↗
19. A data-driven approximation of the koopman operator: Extending dynamic mode decomposition10.1007/s00332-015-9258-5 ↗
20. Dynamic mode decomposition with control10.1137/15M1013857 ↗
21. Data driven governing equations approximation using deep neural networks10.1016/j.jcp.2019.06.042 ↗
22. Medsker, L.R., and Jain, L.C. (2001). Recurrent neural network. Des. Appl., 5.
23. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
24. Bengio, Y., Goodfellow, I., and Courville, A. (2017). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
25. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
26. (2021, May 28). Virtual Performance Solution 2018—Reference Manual. Available online: https://myesi.esi-group.com/downloads/software-documentation/virtual-performance-solution-2018-reference-manual-online.
27. Dynamic mode decomposition with control10.1023/A:1026083619097 ↗
28. Rifkin, R.M., and Lippert, R.A. (2021, May 28). Notes on Regularized Least Squares. Available online: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/37318.
29. (2021, May 28). Scikit-Learn MLPRegressor—Reference Manual. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.neural_network.MLPRegressor.html?highlight=mlpregressor#sklearn.neural_network.MLPRegressor.