Leading-Edge Vortex Characteristics of Low-Aspect-Ratio Sweptback Plates at Low Reynolds Number
Source abstract
Abstract
A sweptback angle can directly regulate a leading-edge vortex on various aerodynamic devices as well as on the wings of biological flyers, but the effect of a sweptback angle has not yet been sufficiently investigated. Here, we thoroughly investigated the effect of the sweptback angle on aerodynamic characteristics of low-aspect-ratio flat plates at a Reynolds number of 2.85 × 104. Direct force/moment measurements and surface oil-flow visualizations were conducted in the wind-tunnel B at the Technical University of Munich. It was found that while the maximum lift at an aspect ratio of 2.03 remains unchanged, two other aspect ratios of 3.13 and 4.50 show a gradual increment in the maximum lift with an increasing sweptback angle. The largest leading-edge vortex contribution was found at the aspect ratio of 3.13, resulting in a superior lift production at a sufficient sweptback angle. This is similar to that of a revolving/flapping wing, where an aspect ratio around three shows a superior lift production. In the oil-flow patterns, it was observed that while the leading-edge vortices at aspect ratios of 2.03 and 3.13 fully covered the surfaces, the vortex at an aspect ratio of 4.50 only covered up the surface approximately three times the chord, similar to that of a revolving/flapping wing. Based on the pattern at the aspect ratio of 4.50, a critical length of the leading-edge vortex of a sweptback plate was measured as ~3.1 times the chord.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Low aspect ratio aerodynamics at low Reynolds numbers10.2514/1.439 ↗
2. Predictions of vortex-lift characteristics by a leading-edge suctionanalogy10.2514/3.44254 ↗
3. Effects of sideslip on the aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio low-Reynolds-number wings10.2514/1.J051151 ↗
4. Measured aerodynamic characteristics of wings at low Reynolds numbers10.1016/j.ast.2014.11.016 ↗
5. Three-dimensional flows around low-aspect-ratio flat-plate wings at low Reynolds numbers10.1017/S0022112008005314 ↗
6. On the mechanism of high-incidence lift generation for steadily translating low-aspect-ratio wings10.1017/jfm.2016.849 ↗
7. On the formation of three-dimensional separated flows over wings under tip effects10.1017/jfm.2020.248 ↗
8. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight10.1038/384626a0 ↗
9. Biofluiddynamic scaling of flapping, spinning and translating fins and wings10.1242/jeb.022251 ↗
10. Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings10.1242/jeb.022269 ↗
11. Aspect ratio studies on insect wings10.1063/1.5129191 ↗
12. The role of advance ratio and aspect ratio in determining leading-edge vortex stability for flapping flight10.1017/jfm.2014.262 ↗
13. The advance ratio effect on the lift augmentations of an insect-like flapping wing in forward flight10.1017/jfm.2016.629 ↗
14. Coriolis effect and the attachment of the leading edge vortex10.1017/jfm.2017.222 ↗
15. Power reduction and the radial limit of stall delay in revolving wings of different aspect ratio10.1098/rsif.2015.0051 ↗
16. Vortices behavior depending on the aspect ratio of an insect-like flapping wing in hover10.1007/s00348-015-2049-9 ↗
17. Aspect ratio effects on revolving wings with Rossby number consideration10.1088/1748-3190/11/5/056013 ↗
18. On the lift-optimal aspect ratio of a revolving wing at low Reynolds number10.1098/rsif.2017.0933 ↗
19. Unsteady flow phenomena associated with leading-edge vortices10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.10.002 ↗
20. The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight10.1242/jeb.200.21.2705 ↗
21. Wing and body kinematics of forward flight in drone-flies10.1088/1748-3190/11/5/056002 ↗
22. Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight10.1242/jeb.005686 ↗
23. Measurement of unsteady fluid dynamic forces for a mechanical dragonfly model10.2514/1.15899 ↗
24. Han, J.-S., Chang, J.W., Kang, I.-M., and Kim, S.-T. (2010, January 4–7). Flow visualization and force measurement of an insect-based flapping wing. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, USA. AIAA paper 2010-66.10.2514/6.2010-66 ↗
25. Turbulent and transitional flow around the AVT-183 diamond wing10.1016/j.ast.2019.06.025 ↗
26. Anderson, J.D. (2007). Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, McGraw–Hill.
27. The ultra-low Reynolds number airfoil wake10.1007/s00348-009-0713-7 ↗
28. Low Reynolds number aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio, thin/flat/cambered-plate wings10.2514/2.2676 ↗
29. Sectional lift coefficient of a flapping wing in hovering motion10.1063/1.3471593 ↗
30. Flow patterns and aerodynamic performance of unswept and swept-back wings10.1115/1.4000260 ↗
31. Dual leading-edge vortices on flapping wings10.1242/jeb.02614 ↗
32. Gordnier, R., and Visbal, M. (2003, January 6–9). Higher-Order Compact Difference Scheme Applied to Low Sweep Delta Wing Flow. Proceedings of the 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. AIAA paper 2003-620.10.2514/6.2003-620 ↗
33. Buffeting flows over a low-sweep delta wing10.2514/1.5391 ↗
34. How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings10.1038/nature05733 ↗
35. Chellapurath, M., Noble, S., and Sreejalekshmi, K.G. (2020). Design and kinematic analysis of flapping wing mechanism for common swift inspired micro aerial vehicle. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C, 0954406220974046.10.1177/0954406220974046 ↗