journal article·2021-03-04Open access

Robot-Touch Promotes Memory Sensitization

Soheil Keshmiri

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 5

Abstract

Research show that we are more skeptical of the machines than fellow humans. They also find that we are reluctant to change this perception in spite of the possibility for increased efficiency through cooperative engagement with them. However, these findings that primarily focused on algorithmic agents may not readily be attributable to the case of robots. To fill this gap, the present study investigated whether the background information about the level of autonomy of a robot would have any effect on its perception by individuals whom it made a physical contact with. For this purpose, we conducted an experiment in which a robot-arm touched the left arm of thirty young Japanese adults (fifteen females, age: 22 ± 1.64) in two trials. While the robot was autonomous in both trials, we told our participants that in one of their trials the robot was controlled by a human operator while in the other the robot moved autonomously. We observed that the previous findings on soft agents extended to the case of robots in that participants significantly preferred their trial that was supposedly operated by a human. More importantly, we identified a memory sensitization with respect to the trial-order in which participants preferred their first trial, regardless of whether it was a robot- or a supposedly human-controlled scenario. As a type of nondeclarative memory that contributes to nonassociative learning, the observed memory sensitization highlighted participants’ growing perceptual distance to the robot-touch that was primarily triggered by the unconscious learning-component of their physical contact with the robot. The present findings substantiate the necessity for more in-depth and socially situated study and analysis of these new generation of our tools to better comprehend the extent of their (dis)advantages to more effectively introduce them to our society.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Face Recognition and Perception · Action Observation and Synchronization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0237, Japan

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (63)

Show source-provided references
2. ‘Captivity bias’ in animal tool use and its implications for the evolution of hominin technology10.1098/rstb.2012.0421 ↗
3. Kin-based cultural transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees10.1126/sciadv.1602750 ↗
4. Is overimitation a uniquely human phenomenon? Insights from human children as compared to bonobos10.1111/cdev.12857 ↗
5. Byrne, R.W. (2004). The manual skills and cognition that lie behind hominid tool use. The Evolution of Thought: Evolutionary Origins of Great Ape Intelligence, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511542299.005 ↗
6. Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution10.1098/rstb.2011.0099 ↗
7. The neural basis of human tool use10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00310 ↗
8. A review of collective robotic construction10.1126/scirobotics.aau8479 ↗
9. Trends and challenges in robot manipulation
10. Review on space robotics: Toward top-level science through space exploration10.1126/scirobotics.aan5074 ↗
11. Micro/nanorobots for biomedicine: Delivery, surgery, sensing, and detoxification10.1126/scirobotics.aam6431 ↗
12. To integrate and to empower: Robots for rehabilitation and assistance10.1126/scirobotics.aan5593 ↗
13. A more human prosthetic hand10.1126/scirobotics.abd9341 ↗
14. Socially assistive robotics: Human augmentation versus automation10.1126/scirobotics.aam5410 ↗
15. Can social robots help children in healthcare contexts? A scoping review10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000371 ↗
16. Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot10.1126/scirobotics.aat7544 ↗
17. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center10.1073/pnas.0707769104 ↗
18. The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: A randomized controlled trial10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007 ↗
19. Social robots in advanced dementia
20. Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err10.1037/xge0000033 ↗
21. Merritt, T., and McGee, K. (2012, January 5–10). Protecting artificial team-mates: More seems like less. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, TX, USA.10.1145/2207676.2208680 ↗
22. Oudah, M., Babushkin, V., Chenlinangjia, T., and Crandall, J.W. (2015, January 2–5). Learning to interact with a human partner. Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Portland, OR, USA.10.1145/2696454.2696482 ↗
23. Association between clinician computer use and communication with patients in safety-net clinics10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6186 ↗
24. Do patients trust computers?10.1002/bdm.542 ↗
25. Behavioural evidence for a transparency–efficiency tradeoff in human–machine cooperation10.1038/s42256-019-0113-5 ↗
26. Dimensions of mind perception10.1126/science.1134475 ↗
27. Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958 ↗
28. Uchida, T., Takahashi, H., Ban, M., Shimaya, J., Minato, T., Ogawa, K., Yoshikawa, Y., and Ishiguro, H. (2020). Japanese Young Women did not discriminate between robots and humans as listeners for their self-disclosure-pilot study. Multimodal Technol. Interact., 4.10.3390/mti4030035 ↗
29. A robot is not worth another: Exploring children’s mental state attribution to different humanoid robots10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011 ↗
30. Graham, B. (2018, October 05). SOUL MATE Erica the Japanese Robot Is So Lifelike She ‘Has a Soul’ and Can Tell JOKES… Although They Aren’t Very Funny. THE Sun. Available online: https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/5050946/erica-robot-lifelike-soul-jokes/.
31. Cai, F. (2021, March 03). Japanese Scientist Insists His Robot Twin Is Not Creepy Synced, AI Technology & Industry Review. Available online: https://syncedreview.com/2019/11/14/japanese-scientist-insists-his-robot-twin-is-not-creepy/.
32. Zeeberg, A. (2021, March 03). What We Can Learn about Robots from Japan, BBC, 2020. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20191220-what-we-can-learn-about-robots-from-japan.
33. Campeau-Lecours, A., Lamontagne, H., Latour, S., Fauteux, P., Maheu, V., Boucher, F., Deguire, C., and L’Ecuyer, L.J.C. (2019). Kinova modular robot arms for service robotics applications. Rapid Automation: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-8060-7.ch032 ↗
34. Development, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J)10.2132/personality.21.40 ↗
35. An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216 ↗
36. Use of a non-human robot audience to induce stress reactivity in human participants10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.019 ↗
37. Mardia, K., Kent, J., and Bibby, J. (1979). Multivariate analysis. Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Academic Press Inc.
38. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152 ↗
39. How to estimate and interpret various effect sizes10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.473 ↗
40. Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation10.1111/1467-9280.00287 ↗
41. Machine behaviour10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y ↗
42. The grand challenges of Science Robotics10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650 ↗
43. Exploratory Study of Touch zones in college students on two campuses10.32398/cjhp.v6i1.1289 ↗
44. Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans10.1073/pnas.1519231112 ↗
45. Cross-cultural similarity in relationship-specific social touching10.1098/rspb.2019.0467 ↗
46. Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivry, R.B., and Mangun, G.R. (2019). Cognitive Neuroscience. The Biology of the Mind, W.W. Norton & Company. [5th ed.].
47. The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation10.1038/nrn1919 ↗
48. Very long-lasting priming in picture naming10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00446.x ↗
49. Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory10.1038/nrn1825 ↗
50. Neural mechanisms for accepting and rejecting artificial social partners in the uncanny valley10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2956-18.2019 ↗
51. Pollick, F.E. (2009). In search of the uncanny valley. International Conference on User Centric Media, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-12630-7_8 ↗
52. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects10.1038/13217 ↗
53. Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses10.1093/cercor/bhi123 ↗
54. Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley10.1073/pnas.0910063106 ↗
55. Panksepp, J. (2004). Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions, Oxford University Press.
56. Social Cognition in the Age of Human-Robot Interaction10.1016/j.tins.2020.03.013 ↗
57. Interacting minds-a biological basis10.1126/science.286.5445.1692 ↗
58. Dennett, D.C. (1989). The Intentional Stance, MIT Press.10.1017/S0140525X00058611 ↗
59. The social motivation theory of autism10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.007 ↗
60. Theory of mind: A neural prediction problem10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.020 ↗
61. Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.02.013 ↗
62. In our own image? Emotional and neural processing differences when observing human–human vs. human–robot interactions10.1093/scan/nsv043 ↗
63. Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction10.1038/s41583-019-0179-4 ↗