journal article·2021-02-22Open access

Functional Evaluation of a Novel Multi-Axial Alveolar Distractor—Preliminary In Vivo Animal Study

Cheng-Hsien Wu, Kun-Chun Chen, Yang-Sung Lin, Yuan-Chih Liu, Chun-Li Lin

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 4

Abstract

This study evaluates the biomechanical performance of a new multi-axial alveolar distractor using an animal study. The multi-axial alveolar distractor is designed with a ball and socket joint mechanism that can rotate up to 60° toward the buccal/lingual and mesial/distal sides intra-operatively to achieve vector control. The transport segment can be moved through activating the transport screw with 0.25 pitch, allowing 13 mm in distraction height. This distractor was fixed at the right angulus mandibular of experimental rabbits and adjusted 15° toward the mesial side and 25° toward the buccal side as Group TMB (toward mesial-buccal) (n = 3), and 15° toward the mesial side as Group TM (toward mesial) (n = 3). Group TC (control) was the control group. The distractors were activated 1 mm/day for 13 days. Living bone growth was observed at various periods. The total bone growth length at the angulus region and buccal side distraction thickness after distraction were calculated. The variations in bone growth geometric shape at the mandible angulus were also recorded. Fracture testing was performed to understand the variations in the mechanical strength between the distracted and intact bone specimens. The digital radiography results showed that the osteotomy areas at the mandible angulus were healed and the bone growth completed after surgery. The average bone growth length of Group TMB was 17.68 mm. This was greater than that of Group TM at 14.79 mm. The corresponding buccal side distractor thicknesses for Group TMB and TM after distraction were 5.12 ± 0.52 mm and 3.32 ± 0.37 mm, respectively. The tensile strengths of the bone specimens after distraction of Groups TMB, TM and TC were 172.13 N, 119.27 N and 304.24 N, respectively, and the percentage of distraction bone tensile strength to normal bone was 57% and 39% for Groups TMB and TM, respectively. This study concluded that this new multi-axial alveolar bone distractor can drive bones to grow in accordance with the direction/angle of the distraction plan. The bone growth healed gradually and presented insufficient mechanical strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments · Cleft Lip and Palate Research · Airway Management and Intubation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan

Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Comparison between interpositional bone grafting and osteogenic alveolar distraction in alveolar bone reconstruction10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.073 ↗
2. Combined orthodontic temporary anchorage devices and surgical management of the alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.023 ↗
3. Maintaining vector control during alveolar distraction osteogenesis: A technical note
4. Distraction-resisting force during tibial diaphyseal lengthening and consolidation—A study on a rabbit model10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.001 ↗
5. Alternative method to reposition the dislocated transport segment during vertical alveolar distraction10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.026 ↗
6. The tension–stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part I. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction10.1097/00003086-198901000-00038 ↗
7. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation
8. Posterior maxillary alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis by bi-directional distractor10.1016/S1348-8643(13)00003-7 ↗
9. Vertical Alveolar Ridge Augmentation by Distraction Osteogenesis
10. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis10.1054/ijom.2001.0134 ↗
11. Evaluation of osseous regeneration in alveolar distraction osteogenesis with histological and radiological aspects10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.057 ↗
12. Evaluation of the mechanical environment during distraction osteogenesis10.1097/00003086-199804000-00028 ↗
13. Distraction osteogenesis for the cranio-maxillofacial region (III): A compendium of devices for the dentoalveolus10.1016/j.ajoms.2012.08.017 ↗
14. Vector of device placement and trajectory of mandibular distraction10.1097/00001665-199711000-00009 ↗
15. Vertical alveolar ridge distraction with prosthetic treatable distractors: A clinical investigation
16. Experimental and clinical experience with distraction osteogenesis10.1597/1545-1569_1994_031_0473_eacewd_2.3.co_2 ↗
17. Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: Review of five cases10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90303-1 ↗
18. Novel multi-axial alveolar distractor-Part I: Design, manufacture, and mechanical/functional tests10.1016/j.jcms.2019.02.008 ↗
19. Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible. Part III: Laboratory studies of sagittal (anteroposterior) and horizontal (mediolateral) movements10.1097/00001665-200011020-00004 ↗
20. Minor complications arising in alveolar distraction osteogenesis10.1053/joms.2002.31844 ↗
21. Effects of local simvastatin on periosteal distraction osteogenesis in rabbits10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.01.006 ↗
22. Bi-directional distraction osteogenesis of the alveolar bone using an extra osseous device10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01185.x ↗
23. Computer-simulated bi-directional alveolar distraction osteogenesis10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01579.x ↗
24. Detection of alkaline and acid phosphatases around titanium implants: A light microscopical and histochemical study in rabbits10.1016/0142-9612(95)91049-5 ↗
25. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis: A systematic review10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.020 ↗