journal article·2020-08-07Open access

Robust Phase Estimation of Gaussian States in the Presence of Outlier Quantum States

Yukito Mototake, Jun Suzuki

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 16

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the problem of estimating the phase of a coherent state in the presence of unavoidable noisy quantum states. These unwarranted quantum states are represented by outlier quantum states in this study. We first present a statistical framework of robust statistics in a quantum system to handle outlier quantum states. We then apply the method of M-estimators to suppress untrusted measurement outcomes due to outlier quantum states. Our proposal has the advantage over the classical methods in being systematic, easy to implement, and robust against occurrence of noisy states.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Information and Cryptography · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu-shi, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Self-consistent quantum process tomography10.1103/PhysRevA.87.062119 ↗
2. Self-guided quantum tomography10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.190404 ↗
3. Sugiyama, T., Imori, S., and Tanaka, F. (2018). Reliable characterization of super-accurate quantum operations. arXiv.
4. Huber, P.J. (2004). Robust Statistics, John Wiley & Sons.
5. Andrews, D., and Hampel, F. (2015). Robust Estimates of Location: Survey and Advances, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400867011 ↗
6. Wilcox, R.R. (2011). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-386983-8.00001-9 ↗
7. Hampel, F.R., Ronchetti, E.M., Rousseeuw, P.J., and Stahel, W.A. (2011). Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions, John Wiley & Sons.
8. Maronna, R.A., Martin, R.D., Yohai, V.J., and Salibián-Barrera, M. (2019). Robust Statistics: Theory and Methods (with R), John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119214656 ↗
9. The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108 ↗
10. Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 201510.1038/s41562-018-0399-z ↗
11. Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913 ↗
12. Quantum information with continuous variables10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513 ↗
13. Quantum information with Gaussian states10.1016/j.physrep.2007.04.005 ↗
14. Serafini, A. (2017). Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods, CRC Press.10.1201/9781315118727 ↗
15. Robust parameter estimation with a small bias against heavy contamination10.1016/j.jmva.2008.02.004 ↗
16. The minimum variance of estimates in quantum signal detection10.1109/TIT.1968.1054108 ↗
17. Quantum detection and estimation theory10.1007/BF01007479 ↗
18. Noncommuting observables in quantum detection and estimation theory10.1109/TIT.1974.1055173 ↗
19. Multiple-parameter quantum estimation and measurement of nonselfadjoint observables10.1109/TIT.1973.1055103 ↗
20. Helstrom, C.W. (1976). Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, Academic Press.
21. Holevo, A.S. (2011). Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory, Edizioni della Normale.10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9 ↗
22. An estimation theoretical characterization of coherent states10.1063/1.532962 ↗
23. Parameter estimation in quantum optics10.1103/PhysRevA.62.023815 ↗
24. Paris, M.G.A., and Řeháček, J.E. (2004). Quantum State Estimation, Springer.10.1007/b98673 ↗
25. Hayashi, M. (2017). Quantum Information Theory. Graduate Texts in Physics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-49725-8 ↗
26. Nuisance parameter problem in quantum estimation theory: Tradeoff relation and qubit examples10.1088/1751-8121/ab8672 ↗
27. Suzuki, J., Yang, Y., and Hayashi, M. (2020). Quantum state estimation with nuisance parameters. J. Phys. A Math. Theor.10.1088/1751-8121/ab8b78 ↗
28. Phase estimation for thermal Gaussian states10.1103/PhysRevA.79.033834 ↗
29. Quantum parameter estimation using general single-mode Gaussian states10.1103/PhysRevA.88.040102 ↗
30. Ultimate precision of joint quadrature parameter estimation with a Gaussian probe10.1103/PhysRevA.97.012106 ↗
31. Optimal Gaussian measurements for phase estimation in single-mode Gaussian metrology10.1038/s41534-019-0124-4 ↗
32. Using states with a large photon number variance to increase quantum Fisher information in single-mode phase estimation10.1088/2399-6528/ab524a ↗
33. Arnhem, M., Karpov, E., and Cerf, N.J. (2019). Optimal Estimation of Parameters Encoded in Quantum Coherent State Quadratures. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9204264 ↗
34. Optimal distributed quantum sensing using Gaussian states10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023030 ↗
35. Accessible precisions for estimating two conjugate parameters using Gaussian probes10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023182 ↗
36. Donoho, D.L., and Huber, P.J. (1983). The notion of breakdown point. A Festschrift for Erich L. Lehmann, CRC Press.
37. Finite sample breakdown of M-and P-estimators10.1214/aos/1176346396 ↗