Automated Detection and Classification of Defective and Abnormal Dies in Wafer Images
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents an automated vision-based algorithm for the die-scale inspection of wafer images captured using scanning acoustic tomography (SAT). This algorithm can find defective and abnormal die-scale patterns, and produce a wafer map to visualize the distribution of defects and anomalies on the wafer. The main procedures include standard template extraction, die detection through template matching, pattern candidate prediction through clustering, and pattern classification through deep learning. To conduct the template matching, we first introduce a two-step method to obtain a standard template from the original SAT image. Subsequently, a majority of the die patterns are detected through template matching. Thereafter, the columns and rows arranged from the detected dies are predicted using a clustering method; thus, an initial wafer map is produced. This map is composed of detected die patterns and predicted pattern candidates. In the final phase of the proposed algorithm, we implement a deep learning-based model to determine defective and abnormal patterns in the wafer map. The experimental results verified the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed algorithm. In conclusion, the proposed method performs well in identifying defective and abnormal die patterns, and produces a wafer map that presents important information for solving wafer fabrication issues.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, National United University, Miaoli 36063, Taiwan
Funding
National United University
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Automated visual inspection in the semiconductor industry: A survey10.1016/j.compind.2014.10.006 ↗
2. Defect detection on semiconductor wafer surfaces10.1016/j.mee.2004.12.003 ↗
3. Schulze, M.A., Hunt, M.A., Voelkl, E., Hickson, J.D., Usry, W., Smith, R.G., Bryant, R., and Thomas, C.E. (2003, January 27–28). Semiconductor wafer defect detection using digital holography. Proceedings of the SPIE 5041, Process and Materials Characterization and Diagnostics in IC Manufacturing, Santa Clara, CA, USA.10.1117/12.485237 ↗
4. Automatic defect detection from SEM images of wafers using component tree10.5573/JSTS.2017.17.1.086 ↗
5. A wavelet-based approach in detecting visual defects on semiconductor wafer dies10.1109/TSM.2010.2046108 ↗
6. A novel defect inspection method for semiconductor wafer based on magneto-optic imaging10.1007/s10909-012-0671-y ↗
7. Ross, R.J. (2011). Acoustic Microscopy of Semiconductor Packages. Microelectronics Failure Analysis: Desk Reference, ASM International. [6th ed.].
8. Sakai, K., Kikuchi, O., Kitami, K., Umeda, M., and Ohno, S. (2016, January 18–21). Defect detection method using statistical image processing of scanning acoustic tomography. Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, Singapore.10.1109/IPFA.2016.7564303 ↗
9. Kitami, K., Takada, M., Kikuchi, O., and Ohno, S. (2013, January 15–19). Development of high resolution scanning aeoustie tomograph for advanced LSI packages. Proceedings of the IEEE 20th International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, Suzhou, China.10.1109/IPFA.2013.6599215 ↗
10. Sakai, K., Kikuchi, O., Takada, M., Sugaya, N., and Ohno, S. (July, January 29). Image improvement using image processing for scanning acoustic tomograph images. Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
11. Brunelli, R. (2009). Template Matching as Testing. Template Matching Techniques in Computer Vision: Theory and Practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. [1st ed.].10.1002/9780470744055 ↗
12. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
13. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–8). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2012, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA.
14. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (July, January 26). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
15. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2015, January 7–12). Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2015, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
16. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (July, January 26). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
17. Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., and Alemi, A.A. (2017, January 4–10). Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 ↗
18. Howard, A.G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., and Adam, H. (2017). Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv.
19. Wafer map defect pattern classification and image retrieval using convolutional neural network10.1109/TSM.2018.2795466 ↗
20. Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation
21. Cross-validation of regression model10.1080/01621459.1984.10478083 ↗
22. ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗
23. Benchmark analysis of representative deep neural network architectures10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877890 ↗