Performance Analysis and Parameter Optimization of the Optimal Fixed-Point Quantum Search
Source abstract
Abstract
The optimal fixed-point quantum search (OFPQS) algorithm [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 210501 (2014)] achieves both the fixed-point property and quadratic speedup over classical algorithms, which gives a sufficient condition on the number of iterations to ensure the success probability is no less than a given lower bound (denoted by 1 − δ 2 ). However, this condition is approximate and not exact. In this paper, we derive the sufficient and necessary condition on the number of feasible iterations, based on which the exact least number of iterations can be obtained. For example, when δ = 0 . 8 , iterations can be saved by almost 25%. Moreover, to find a target item certainly, setting directly 1 − δ 2 = 100 % , the quadratic advantage of the OFPQS algorithm will be lost, then, applying the OFPQS algorithm with 1 − δ 2 < 100 % requires multiple executions, which leads to a natural problem of choosing the optimal parameter δ . For this, we analyze the extreme and minimum properties of the success probability and further analytically derive the optimal δ which minimizes the query complexity. Our study can be a guideline for both the theoretical and application research on the fixed-point quantum search algorithms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science, College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2121, USA
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks, Center of Quantum Information Sensing and Processing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Funding
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Grover, L.K. (1996). A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM.10.1145/237814.237866 ↗
2. Quantum computers can search arbitrarily large databases by a single query10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4709 ↗
3. Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing10.1137/S0097539796300933 ↗
4. Tight bounds on quantum searching10.1002/(SICI)1521-3978(199806)46:4/5<493::AID-PROP493>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
5. Grover’s quantum searching algorithm is optimal10.1103/PhysRevA.60.2746 ↗
6. Grover, L.K., and Radhakrishnan, J. (2005). Is partial quantum search of a database any easier?. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, ACM.10.1145/1073970.1073997 ↗
7. Searching a quantum phone book10.1126/science.275.5300.627 ↗
8. Nielsen, M.A., and Chuang, I.L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press.
9. Brassard, G., and Høyer, P. (1997). An exact quantum polynomial-time algorithm for Simon’s problem. Proceedings of the Fifth Israel Symposium on the Theory of Computing Systems, IEEE Computer Society.10.1109/ISTCS.1997.595153 ↗
10. Quantum computers can search rapidly by using almost any transformation10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4329 ↗
11. Larsen, K.G., Skyum, S., and Winskel, G. (1998). Quantum counting. International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, Springer.10.1007/BFb0055035 ↗
12. Lomonaco, S.J., and Brandt, H.E. (2002). Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. Quantum Computation and Information, AMS.10.1090/conm/305 ↗
13. Phase matching in quantum searching10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00631-3 ↗
14. Arbitrary phases in quantum amplitude amplification10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052304 ↗
15. Phase matching condition for quantum search with a generalized initial state10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00055-5 ↗
16. Phase matching in Grover’s algorithm10.1016/j.physleta.2007.02.029 ↗
17. Fixed-point quantum search10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.150501 ↗
18. Chakraborty, S., Radhakrishnan, J., and Raghunathan, N. (2005). Bounds for error reduction with few quantum queries. Approximation, Randomization and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques, Springer.10.1007/11538462_21 ↗
19. A new algorithm for fixed point quantum search
20. Fixed-point quantum search with an optimal number of queries10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.210501 ↗
21. Multiphase matching in the Grover algorithm10.1103/PhysRevA.77.042324 ↗
22. Matched-multiphase Grover algorithm for a small number of marked states10.1103/PhysRevA.79.014301 ↗
23. Mason, J., and Handscomb, D. (2002). Chebyshev Polynomials, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420036114 ↗
24. Zwillinger, D. (2011). CRC Standard Mathematical Tables and Formulae, CRC Press.10.1201/b10980 ↗