Correction of Point Load Strength on Irregular Carbonaceous Slate in the Luang Prabang Suture Zone and the Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength
Source abstract
Abstract
Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) testing requires high-quality core samples, which is a difficult task for weak, highly fractured, thinly bedded, foliated, and weathered rocks. In addition, it is time-consuming and expensive. Because of the good relationship between rock point load strength (PLS) and UCS, the PLS could be used to estimate rock UCS quickly. The lump structure and layer structure of carbonaceous slate are revealed in the tunnels of the China–Laos Railway in the Laos Luang Prabang Suture Zone as one of the important factors leading to tunnel squeezing deformation and support structures. To reveal the relationship between the PLS and UCS of carbonaceous slate in the Luang Prabang Suture Zone, PLS tests and UCS tests of lump-structure carbonaceous slate (lamina plane inconspicuous) and layer-structure carbonaceous slate (lamina plane conspicuous) were performed. Results show that the Is(50) of lump-structure carbonaceous slate ranged from 0.06 MPa to 0.30 Mpa, the Is(50) of layer-structure carbonaceous slates which were loaded perpendicular to the lamina plane ranged from 0.64 MPa to 1.25 MPa, the Is(50) of layer-structure carbonaceous slates which were loaded parallel to the lamina plane ranged from 0.49 MPa to 0.71 MPa, and the correction power index m ranged from 0.42 to 0.51 with an average value of 0.47. Four correlation expressions of carbonaceous slate relationships between PLS and UCS were fitted by zero-intercept linear expression, nonzero intercept linear expression, power expression, and logarithmic expression, and the calculation results were compared with results calculated by the International Society of Rock Mechanics (ISRM) correlation equation. It is concluded that the correlation equation between UCS and PLS recommended by ISRM specifications easily causes soft rock strength overestimation, which affects the correct evaluation of the surrounding rock property and the structural design safety of tunnels and underground projects. The zero-intercept linear equation UCS = 18.45Is(50) has better goodness of fit and higher accuracy in predicting the UCS of the carbonaceous slate in the Luang Prabang Suture Zone.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Drilling and Well Engineering · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sinohydro Bureau 3Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710024, China
China Railway Economic and Planning Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100038, China
Key Laboratory for Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Parallel Tethyan sutures in mainland Southeast Asia: New insights for Paleo-Tethys closure and implications for the Indosinian orogeny10.1016/j.crte.2007.09.008 ↗
2. The division of tectonic units and tectonic evolution in Laos and its adjacent regions
3. Geochronological and geochemical constraints on the mafic rocks along the Luang Prabang zone: Carboniferous back-arc setting in northwest Laos10.1016/j.lithos.2015.07.019 ↗
4. The point-load strength test10.1016/0148-9062(72)90030-7 ↗
5. Point Load Strength Index of Half Cut Core Specimens and Correlation with Uniaxial Compressive Strength10.1007/s00603-020-02137-9 ↗
6. Assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of extremely hard cryptocrystalline flint10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.12.002 ↗
7. Point load strength index of granitic irregular lumps: Size correction and correlation with uniaxial compressive strength10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.011 ↗
8. Utilizing the strength conversion factor in the estimation of uniaxial compressive strength from the point load index10.1007/s10064-015-0721-1 ↗
9. Prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of soft rocks: A PSO-based ANN approach10.1007/s10064-014-0638-0 ↗
10. Predicting the Uniaxial Compressive and Tensile Strengths of Gypsum Rock by Point Load Testing10.1007/s00603-011-0196-8 ↗
11. Relationship between point load strength index and uniaxial compressive strength of hydrothermally altered soft rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.011 ↗
12. Use of the block punch test to predict the compressive and tensile strengths of rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.016 ↗
13. Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength from point load strength, Schmidt hardness and P-wave velocity10.1007/s10064-008-0158-x ↗
14. Estimation of strength and deformation properties of Quaternary caliche deposits10.1007/s10064-008-0146-1 ↗
15. A comparative evaluation of indirect methods to estimate the compressive strength of rocks10.1007/s00603-005-0061-8 ↗
16. Considerations on strength of intact sedimentary rocks10.1016/j.enggeo.2003.10.001 ↗
17. Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00039-9 ↗
18. A fractal approach to indentation size effect10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.020 ↗
19. Uniaxial compressive strength and point load index of volcanic irregular lumps10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.02.010 ↗
20. The determination of uniaxial compressive strength from point load strength for pyroclastic rocks10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.12.009 ↗
21. Study on uniaxial compressive strength, point load strength index, dynamic and physical properties of serpentinites from Central Greece: Test results and empirical relations10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.07.002 ↗
22. Field methods for characterizing weak rock for engineering10.2113/12.1.1 ↗
23. Core testes with diametral point loads
24. Stress analysis of cylindrical rock discs subjected to axial double point load10.1016/0148-9062(76)90426-5 ↗
25. An equivalent area method for evaluating the point load strength of irregular soft phyllite
26. On the statistical analysis of data and strength determination in point load tests of rock
27. Suggested method for determining point load strength10.1016/0148-9062(85)92327-7 ↗
28. Size and shape effects in point load tests of irregular rock fragments10.1007/BF01040515 ↗
29. Venkatesh, A. Correlation between point load index and uniaxial compressive Strength for different rock types10.1007/s00603-011-0192-z ↗
30. Soft, stiff and servo-controlled testing machines10.1016/0013-7952(72)90001-4 ↗
31. Experimental study on correlation between compressive strength of rocks and sample size
32. Relation between point load index and uniaxial compressive strength for igneous rock