journal article·2023-05-19Open access

New Challenges in Nuclear Fusion Reactors: From Data Analysis to Materials and Manufacturing

Emmanuele Peluso, Ekaterina Pakhomova, Michela Gelfusa

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 10

Abstract

The construction and operation of the first generation of magnetically controlled nuclear fusion power plants require the development of proper physics and the engineering bases. The analysis of data, recently collected by the actual largest and most important tokamak in the world JET, that has successfully completed his second deuterium and tritium campaign in 2021 (DTE2) with a full ITER like wall main chamber, has provided an important consolidation of the ITER physics basis. Thermonuclear plasmas are highly nonlinear systems characterized by the need of numerous diagnostics to measure physical quantities to guide, through proper control schemes, external actuators. Both modelling and machine learning approaches are required to maximize the physical understanding of plasma dynamics and at the same time, engineering challenges have to be faced. Fusion experiments are indeed extremely hostile environments for plasma facing materials (PFM) and plasma-facing components (PFC), both in terms of neutron, thermal loads and mechanical stresses that the components have to face during either steady operation or off-normal events. Efforts are therefore spent by the community to reach the ultimate goal ahead: turning on the first nuclear fusion power plant, DEMO, by 2050. This editorial is dedicated at reviewing some aspects touched in recent studies developed in this dynamic, challenging project, collected by the special issue titled “New Challenges in Nuclear Fusion Reactors: From Data Analysis to Materials and Manufacturing”.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy

Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy

Funding

Italian Ministry of Research

References (80)

Show source-provided references
1. Romanelli, F. (2020). Fusion energy. EPJ Web Conf., 246.10.1051/epjconf/202024600013 ↗
2. On the optimal mix of renewable energy sources, electrical energy storage and thermoelectric generation for the de-carbonization of the Italian electrical system10.1140/epjp/s13360-019-00036-9 ↗
3. Kembleton, R. (2019). Managing Global Warming, Academic Press.
4. (2022, February 09). Announcement of the Joint European Torus (JET) Deuterium-Tritium Results. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H99hvPlC4is.
5. Federici, G., Bachmann, C., Barucca, L., Baylard, C., Biel, W., Boccaccini, L.V., Bustreo, C., Ciattaglia, S., Cismondi, F., and Corato, V. (2019). Overview of the DEMO staged design approach in Europe. Nucl. Fusion, 59.10.1088/1741-4326/ab1178 ↗
6. Igochine, V. (2015). Active Control of Magneto-Hydrodynamic Instabilities in Hot Plasmas, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-44222-7 ↗
7. Ambrosino, R. (2021). DTT—Divertor Tokamak Test facility: A testbed for DEMO. Fusion Eng. Des., 167.10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112330 ↗
8. Wan, B., Liang, Y., Gong, X., Xiang, N., Xu, G., Sun, Y., Wang, L., Qian, J., Liu, H., and Zeng, L. (2019). Recent advances in EAST physics experiments in support of steady-state operation for ITER and CFETR. Nucl. Fusion, 59.10.1088/1741-4326/ab0396 ↗
9. Progress of the KSTAR Research Program Exploring the Advanced High Performance and Steady-State Plasma Operations10.3938/jkps.73.712 ↗
10. Shirai, H., Barabaschi, P., Kamada, Y., and The JT-60SA Team (2017). Recent progress of the JT-60SA project. Nucl. Fusion, 57.10.1088/1741-4326/aa5d01 ↗
11. De Vries, P., Johnson, M., Alper, B., Buratti, P., Hender, T., Koslowski, H., and Riccardo, V. (2011). Survey of disruption causes at JET. Nucl. Fusion, 51.10.1088/0029-5515/51/5/053018 ↗
12. De Vries, P., Pautasso, G., Nardon, E., Cahyna, P., Gerasimov, S., Havlicek, J., Hender, T., Huijsmans, G., Lehnen, M., and Maraschek, M. (2015). Scaling of the MHD perturbation amplitude required to trigger a disruption and predictions for ITER. Nucl. Fusion, 56.10.1088/0029-5515/56/2/026007 ↗
13. Disruption prediction with artificial intelligence techniques in tokamak plasmas10.1038/s41567-022-01602-2 ↗
14. Rattá, G., Vega, J., Murari, A., Gadariya, D., and Contributors, J. (2021). PHAD: A phase-oriented disruption prediction strategy for avoidance, prevention, and mitigation in JET. Nucl. Fusion, 61.10.1088/1741-4326/ac2637 ↗
15. Aymerich, E., Cannas, B., Pisano, F., Sias, G., Sozzi, C., Stuart, C., Carvalho, P., Fanni, A., and Contributors, T.J. (2023). Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Disruption Predictors at JET. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13032006 ↗
16. Pucella, G., Buratti, P., Giovannozzi, E., Alessi, E., Auriemma, F., Brunetti, D., Ferreira, D.R., Baruzzo, M., Frigione, D., and Garzotti, L. (2021). Onset of tearing modes in plasma termination on JET: The role of temperature hollowing and edge cooling. Nucl. Fusion, 61.10.1088/1741-4326/abe3c7 ↗
17. Ruiz, M., Nieto, J., Costa, V., Craciunescu, T., Peluso, E., Vega, J., Murari, A., and Contributors, J. (2022). Acceleration of an Algorithm Based on the Maximum Likelihood Bolometric Tomography for the Determination of Uncertainties in the Radiation Emission on JET Using Heterogeneous Platforms. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136798 ↗
18. Craciunescu, T., Peluso, E., Murari, A., Gelfusa, M., and JET Contributors (2018). Maximum likelihood bolometric tomography for the determination of the uncertainties in the radiation emission on JET TOKAMAK. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 89.10.1063/1.5027880 ↗
19. Craciunescu, T., Peluso, E., Murari, A., Bernert, M., Gelfusa, M., Rossi, R., Spolladore, L., Wyss, I., David, P., and Henderson, S. Submitted to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.
20. Coppi, B., Leotta, G.G., Pfirsch, D., Pozzoli, R., and Sindoni, E. (1980). An Empirical Approach to Tokamak Transport, Physics of Plasmas Close to Thermonuclear Conditions, CEC.
21. Goldston, R.J., Reinke, M.L., and Schwartz, J.A. (2017). A new scaling for divertor detachment. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 59.10.1088/1361-6587/aa5e6e ↗
22. Impurity screening in Ohmic and high confinement (H-mode) plasmas in the Alcator C-Mod tokamak10.1063/1.872365 ↗
23. A general comparison between tokamak and stellarator plasmas10.1016/j.mre.2016.07.001 ↗
24. Demonstration of reduced neoclassical energy transport in Wendelstein 7-X10.1038/s41586-021-03687-w ↗
25. Murari, A., Peluso, E., Spolladore, L., Vega, J., and Gelfusa, M. (2022). Considerations on Stellarator’s Optimization from the Perspective of the Energy Confinement Time Scaling Laws. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12062862 ↗
26. Assessment of Global Stellarator Confinement: Status of the International Stellarator Confinement Database10.13182/FST07-A1281 ↗
27. Edge localized modes (ELMs)10.1088/0741-3335/38/2/001 ↗
28. E3LM frequency control by continuous small pellet injection in ASDEX Upgrade10.1088/0029-5515/43/10/012 ↗
29. Garzotti, L., Lang, P.T., Alonso, A., Alper, B., Belonohy, E., Boboc, A., Devaux, S., Eich, T., Frigione, D., and Gál, K. (2010, January 21–25). Investigating pellet ELM triggering physics using the new small size pellet launcher at JET. Proceedings of the 37th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, Dublin, Ireland.
30. Baylor, L.R., Jernigan, T.C., Commaux, N., Combs, S.K., Foust, C.R., Parks, P.B., Evans, T.E., Fenstermacher, M.E., Moyer, R.A., and Osborne, T.H. (2008, January 9–13). ELMs Triggered from Deuterium Pellets Injected into DIII-D and Extrapolation to ITER. Proceedings of the 35th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, Hersonissos, Greece.
31. Mansfield, D., Roquemore, A., Carroll, T., Sun, Z., Hu, J., Zhang, L., Liang, Y., Gong, X., Li, J., and Guo, H. (2013). First observations of ELM triggering by injected lithium granules in EAST. Nucl. Fusion, 53.10.1088/0029-5515/53/11/113023 ↗
32. Huysmans, G.T.A., Pamela, S., Van Der Plas, E., and Ramet, P. (2009). Non-linear MHD simulations of edge localized modes (ELMs). Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 51.10.1088/0741-3335/51/12/124012 ↗
33. Rossi, R., Cesaroni, S., Bombarda, F., Gaudio, P., Gelfusa, M., Marinelli, M., Rinati, G.V., Peluso, E., and Contributors, J. (2022). An Unsupervised Spectrogram Cross-Correlation Method to Assess ELM Triggering Efficiency by Pellets. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12073681 ↗
34. Bombarda, F., Angelone, M., Apruzzese, G., Centioli, C., Cesaroni, S., Gabellieri, L., Grosso, A., Marinelli, M., Milani, E., and Palomba, S. (2021). CVD diamond detectors for fast VUV and SX-ray diagnostics on FTU. Nucl. Fusion, 61.10.1088/1741-4326/ac233a ↗
35. Futatani, S., Pamela, S., Garzotti, L., Huijsmans, G., Hoelzl, M., Frigione, D., Lennholm, M., The JOREK Team, and JET Contributors (2019). Non-linear magnetohydrodynamic simulations of pellet triggered edge-localized modes in JET. Nucl. Fusion, 60.10.1088/1741-4326/ab56c7 ↗
36. Application of tungsten for plasma limiters in TEXTOR10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00119-7 ↗
37. Conclusions about the use of tungsten in the divertor of ASDEX Upgrade10.1016/S0022-3115(98)00890-3 ↗
38. Kubkowska, M., Skladnik-Sadowska, E., Kwiatkowski, R., Malinowski, K., Kowalska-Strzęciwilk, E., Paduch, M., Sadowski, M.J., Pisarczyk, T., Chodukowski, T., and Kalinowska, Z. (2014). Investigation of interactions of intense plasma streams with tungsten and carbon fibre composite targets in the PF-1000 facility. Phys. Scr., T161.10.1088/0031-8949/2014/T161/014038 ↗
39. Ouaras, K., Delacqua, L.C., Quirós, C., Lombardi, G., Redolfi, M., Vrel, D., Hassouni, K., and Bonnin, X. (2015). Experimental studies of the interactions between a hydrogen plasma and a carbon or tungsten wall. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 591.10.1088/1742-6596/591/1/012029 ↗
40. Manufacturing of a full scale baffle prototype for ITER with a CFC and W plasma spray armour10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00386-0 ↗
41. Failure behaviors of vacuum plasma sprayed tungsten coatings for plasma facing application10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.216 ↗
42. Investigation of laser interaction with tungsten target by means of time-resolved optical spectroscopy10.1080/10420150701780912 ↗
43. Linke, J., Loewenhoff, T., Massaut, V., Pintsuk, G., Ritz, G., Rödig, M., Schmidt, A., Thomser, C., Uytdenhouwen, I., and Vasechko, V. (2011). Performance of different tungsten grades under transient thermal loads. Nucl. Fusion, 51.10.1088/0029-5515/51/7/073017 ↗
44. Effects of repeated short heat pulses on tungsten10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.123 ↗
45. High heat flux testing of tungsten plasma facing materials10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.04.006 ↗
46. Farid, N., Harilal, S., El-Atwani, O., Ding, H., and Hassanein, A. (2013). Experimental simulation of materials degradation of plasma-facing components using lasers. Nucl. Fusion, 54.10.1088/0029-5515/54/1/012002 ↗
47. Huber, A., Arakcheev, A., Sergienko, G., Steudel, I., Wirtz, M., Burdakov, A.V., Coenen, J.W., Kreter, A., Linke, J., and Mertens, P. (2014). Investigation of the impact of transient heat loads applied by laser irradiation on ITER-grade tungsten. Phys. Scr., T159.10.1088/0031-8949/2014/T159/014005 ↗
48. Laser Pulse Simulation of High Energy Transient Thermal Loads on Bulk and Plasma Sprayed W for NFR10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.879.1576 ↗
49. Zhu, D., Li, C., Ding, R., Wang, B.G., Chen, J., Gao, B., Gu, Y., Gong, X., and Team, E. (2019). Characterization of the in situ leading-edge-induced melting on the ITER-like tungsten divertor in EAST. Nucl. Fusion, 60.10.1088/1741-4326/ab561e ↗
50. Zhu, D., Li, C., Gao, B., Ding, R., Wang, B., Guo, Z., Xuan, C., Yu, B., Lei, Y., and Chen, J. (2022). In situ leading-edge-induced damages of melting and cracking W/Cu monoblocks as divertor target during long-term operations in EAST. Nucl. Fusion, 62.10.1088/1741-4326/ac3f48 ↗
51. Li, C., Zhu, D., Ding, R., Wang, B., Chen, J., Gao, B., and Lei, Y. (2020). Characterization on the melting failure of CuCrZr cooling tube of W/Cu monoblocks during plasma operations in EAST. Nucl. Mater. Energy, 25.10.1016/j.nme.2020.100847 ↗
52. Lei, Y., Zhu, D., Li, C., Gao, B., Wang, B., Ding, R., Chen, J., Yu, B., and Xuan, C. (2021). Result and discussion on the evolution of in-situ leading edge-induced melting on W divertor targets in EAST. Nucl. Mater. Energy, 27.10.1016/j.nme.2021.100997 ↗
53. Xi, Y., He, G., Zan, X., Wang, K., Zhu, D., Luo, L., Ding, R., and Wu, Y. (2023). Characterization of the Crack and Recrystallization of W/Cu Monoblocks of the Upper Divertor in EAST. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13020745 ↗
54. Riccardi, B., Pizzuto, A., Bertamini, L., Diotalevi, M., and Viedier, G. (1997, January 6–10). Development of tungsten coatings for ITER divertor components. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering, San Diego, CA, USA.
55. Tungsten thick coatings for plasma facing components
56. Investigation of tungsten alloys as plasma facing materials for the ITER divertor10.1016/S0920-3796(02)00113-8 ↗
57. Materials for the plasma-facing components of fusion reactors10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.005 ↗
58. The use of copper alloy CuCrZr as a structural material for actively cooled plasma facing and in vessel components10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.056 ↗
59. Influence of recrystallization on thermal shock resistance of various tungsten grades10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.146 ↗
60. Effect of Oxidation Behavior on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Plasma Sprayed Tungsten Coatings10.1007/s11666-008-9190-4 ↗
61. Vacuum annealing enhances the properties of a tungsten coating deposited on copper by atmospheric plasma spray10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.017 ↗
62. Effect of annealing with pressure on tungsten film properties fabricated by atmospheric plasma spray10.1007/s12540-014-6006-6 ↗
63. Characterisation of plasma sprayed W coatings on a CuCrZr alloy for nuclear fusion reactor applications10.1016/S0167-577X(01)00375-5 ↗
64. Residual stresses in tungsten deposited by plasma spraying: Effect of substrate and processing methods
65. Vacuum plasma spraying of functionally graded tungsten/EUROFER97 coatings for fusion applications10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.06.006 ↗
66. Development of W-coating with functionally graded W/EUROFER-layers for protection of First-Wall materials10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.01.047 ↗
67. Residual stresses in the graded interlayer between W and CuCrZr alloy10.1007/s10853-021-06631-5 ↗
68. Atmospheric plasma spraying of functionally graded steel/tungsten layers for the first wall of future fusion reactors10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.017 ↗
69. Dose, G., Roccella, S., and Romanelli, F. (2022). Engineering of a FGM Interlayer to Reduce the Thermal Stresses Inside the PFCs. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122010215 ↗
70. Noce, S., Flammini, D., Gaudio, P., Gelfusa, M., Mazzone, G., Moro, F., Romanelli, F., Villari, R., and You, J.-H. (2023). Neutronics Assessment of the Spatial Distributions of the Nuclear Loads on the DEMO Divertor ITER-like Targets: Comparison between the WCLL and HCPB Blanket. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031715 ↗
71. Rieth, M., Schirra, M., Falkenstein, A., Graf, P., Heger, S., Kempe, H., Lindau, R., and Zimmermann, H. (2003). EUROFER 97 Tensile, Charpy, Creep and Structural Tests, Forschungzentrum Karlsruhe g.m.b.h.. Eurofusion Programme.
72. Martensitic transformation in Eurofer-97 and ODS-Eurofer steels: A comparative study10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.112 ↗
73. Characterization of Eurofer-97 TIG-welded joints by FIMEC indentation tests10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.173 ↗
74. Present development status of EUROFER and ODS-EUROFER for application in blanket concepts10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.186 ↗
75. Coppola, R., and Klimenkov, M. (2019). Dose Dependence of Micro-Voids Distributions in Low-Temperature Neutron Irradiated Eurofer97 Steel. Metals, 9.10.3390/met9050552 ↗
76. Roldán, M., Fernández, P., Rams, J., Sánchez, F.J., and Gómez-Herrero, A. (2018). Nanoindentation and TEM to Study the Cavity Fate after Post-Irradiation Annealing of He Implanted EUROFER97 and EU-ODS EUROFER. Micromachines, 9.10.3390/mi9120633 ↗
77. Fu, J., Brouwer, J., Hendrikx, R., Richardson, I., and Hermans, M. (2019). Microstructure characterisation and mechanical properties of ODS Eurofer steel subject to designed heat treatments. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 770.10.1016/j.msea.2019.138568 ↗
78. Manufacturing of ODS RAFM Steel: Mechanical and Microstructural Characterization10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.879.1639 ↗
79. De Sanctis, M., Fava, A., Lovicu, G., Montanari, R., Richetta, M., Testani, C., and Varone, A. (2017). Mechanical Characterization of a Nano-ODS Steel Prepared by Low-Energy Mechanical Alloying. Metals, 7.10.3390/met7080283 ↗
80. Stornelli, G., Di Schino, A., Mancini, S., Montanari, R., Testani, C., and Varone, A. (2021). Grain Refinement and Improved Mechanical Properties of EUROFER97 by Thermo-Mechanical Treatments. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112210598 ↗