Copyright Protection of 3D Digitized Artistic Sculptures by Adding Unique Local Inconspicuous Errors by Sculptors
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, digitization of cultural heritage objects, for the purpose of creating virtual museums, is becoming increasingly popular. Moreover, cultural institutions use modern digitization methods to create three-dimensional (3D) models of objects of historical significance to form digital libraries and archives. This research aims to suggest a method for protecting these 3D models from abuse while making them available on the Internet. The proposed method was applied to a sculpture, an object of cultural heritage. It is based on the digitization of the sculpture altered by adding local clay details proposed by the sculptor and on sharing on the Internet a 3D model obtained by digitizing the sculpture with a built-in error. The clay details embedded in the sculpture are asymmetrical and discreet to be unnoticeable to an average observer. The original sculpture was also digitized and its 3D model created. The obtained 3D models were compared and the geometry deviation was measured to determine that the embedded error was invisible to an average observer and that the watermark can be extracted. The proposed method simultaneously protects the digitized image of the artwork while preserving its visual experience. Other methods cannot guarantee this.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Conservation Techniques and Studies · Archaeological Research and Protection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Beograd, Serbia
Gallery of Matica Srpska, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
References (86)
Show source-provided references
1. Djuric, I., Stojakovic, V., Misic, S., Kekeljevic, I., Vasiljevic, I., Obradovic, M., and Obradovic, R. (2019, January 11–13). Church Heritage Multimedia Presentation-Case study of the iconostasis as the characteristic art and architectural element of the Christian Orthodox churches. Architecture in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution. Proceedings of the 37th eCAADe and 23rd SIGraDi Conference, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.10.5151/proceedings-ecaadesigradi2019_421 ↗
2. Koller, D. (2008, January 2–6). Protected sharing of 3D models of cultural heritage and archaeological artifacts. Proceedings of the 36th CAA Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
3. Obradović, R., Stojaković, V., Đurić, I., Vasiljević, I., Kekeljević, I., and Obradović, M. (2019). 3D Digitalization and AR Presentation of the Iconostasis of the Church of St. Procopius the Great Martyr in Srpska Crnja. Exhibition Catalogue Đura Jakšić. Between Myth and Reality, Gallery of Matica Srpska. Available online: http://www.racunarska-grafika.com/srpska-crnja/.
4. Obradović, R., Stojaković, V., Đurić, I., Vasiljević, I., Kekeljević, I., and Obradović, M. (2021, April 03). In the Exhibition Catalogue Kračun. Available online: http://racunarska-grafika.com/mitrovica/.
5. Obradović, R., Stojaković, V., Đurić, I., Vasiljević, I., Kekeljević, I., and Obradović, M. (2021, April 03). In the Exhibition Catalogue Kračun. Available online: http://racunarska-grafika.com/karlovci/.
6. Stojaković, V., Obradović, R., Đurić, I., Vasiljević, I., Obradović, M., and Kićanović, J. (2020). Strategy Development for Standardization of Creation of Photogrammetric 3D Digital Objects of Cultural Heritage—Phase, I. Project Report, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad. Available online: http://www.muzejvojvodine.org.rs/images/Rimsko%20nasledje%20u%203D/index.html.
7. Obradović, M., Vasiljević, I., Đurić, I., Kićanović, J., Stojaković, V., and Obradović, R. (2020). Virtual Reality Models Based on Photogrammetric Surveys—A Case Study of the Iconostasis of the Serbian Orthodox Cathedral Church of Saint Nicholas in Sremski Karlovci (Serbia). Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10082743 ↗
8. Liu, Q., Safavi-Naini, R., and Sheppard, N.P. (2003, January 1). Digital rights management for content distribution. Proceedings of the Australasian Information Security Workshop Conference on ACSW Frontiers 2003, Adelaide, Australia.10.1007/3-540-45067-X ↗
9. Challenges of digital preservation for cultural heritage institutions
10. Fruehauf, J.D., Hartle, F.X., and Al-Khalifa, F. (2021, January 3–6). 3D printing: The future crime of the present. Proceedings of the Conference on Information Systems Applied Research, Washington, DC, USA.
11. Cultural heritage digitization and related intellectual property issues10.1016/j.culher.2018.04.023 ↗
12. Intellectual Property Management in Digitization and Digital Preservation of Cultural Heritage10.21125/edulearn.2019.1468 ↗
13. Ethical issues in digitization of cultural heritage
14. Watermarking three-dimensional polygonal models through geometric and topological modifications10.1109/49.668977 ↗
15. Ohbuchi, R., Masuda, H., and Aono, M. (1997). Embedding data in 3D models. International Workshop on Interactive Distributed Multimedia Systems and Telecommunication Services, Springer.10.1007/BFb0000334 ↗
16. Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models10.1145/1658346.1658347 ↗
17. Levoy, M., Pulli, K., Curless, B., Rusinkiewicz, S., Koller, D., Pereira, L., Ginzton, M., Anderson, S., Davis, J., and Ginsberg, J. (2000, January 23–28). The digital Michelangelo project. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1145/344779.344849 ↗
18. Koller, D., Trimble, J., Najbjerg, T., Gelfand, N., and Levoy, M. (2006, January 20–23). Fragments of the city: Stanford’s digital forma urbisromae project. Proceedings of the Third Williams Symposium on Classical Architecture, Rome, Italy.
19. A new digital model of the roman forum
20. Pham, G.N., Lee, S.-H., Kwon, O.-H., and Kwon, K.-R. (2018). A Watermarking Method for 3D Printing Based on Menger Curvature and K-Mean Clustering. Symmetry, 10.10.3390/sym10040097 ↗
21. 3D Printing Watermarking Algorithm Based on 2D Slice Mean Distance10.30534/ijatcse/2020/10912020 ↗
22. Praun, E., Hoppe, H., and Finkelstein, A. (1999, January 1). Robust mesh watermarking. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1145/311535.311540 ↗
23. Wu, H.T., and Cheung, Y.M. (2005, January 1–2). A fragile watermarking scheme for 3D meshes. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Multimedia and Security, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/1073170.1073192 ↗
24. Euclidean Distance Distortion Based Robust and Blind Mesh Watermarking
25. Nakazawa, S., Kasahara, S., and Takahashi, S. (2010, January 15–17). A visually enhanced approach to watermarking 3D models. Proceedings of the 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, Darmstadt, Germany.10.1109/IIHMSP.2010.35 ↗
26. An Oblivious Watermarking for 3-D Polygonal Meshes Using Distribution of Vertex Norms10.1109/TSP.2006.882111 ↗
27. Botta, M., Cavagnino, D., Gribaudo, M., and Piazzolla, P. (2020). Fragile Watermarking of 3D Models in a Transformed Domain. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10093244 ↗
28. Cox, I., Miller, M., Bloom, J., Fridrich, J., and Kalker, T. (2007). Digital Watermarking and Steganography, Morgan Kaufmann.10.1016/B978-012372585-1.50015-2 ↗
29. Robust and blind mesh watermarking based on volume moments10.1016/j.cag.2010.09.010 ↗
30. Applying 3D Polygonal Mesh Watermarking for Transmission Security Protection through Sensor Networks
31. A smartphone-based 3D pipeline for the creative industry-the replicate EU project
32. Remondino, F., Del Pizzo, S., Kersten, T.P., and Troisi, S. (2012). Low-cost and open-source solutions for automated image orientation–A critical overview. Euro-Mediterranean Conference, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_5 ↗
33. Schöning, J., and Heidemann, G. (2015). Evaluation of multi-view 3D reconstruction software. International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-23117-4_39 ↗
34. Stathopoulou, E.K., Welponer, M., and Remondino, F. (2019, January 2–3). Open-Source Image-Based 3d Reconstruction Pipelines: Review, Comparison and Evaluation. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop LowCost 3D—Sensors, Algorithms, Applications, Strasbourg, France.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W17-331-2019 ↗
35. Rahaman, H., and Champion, E. (2019). To 3D or Not 3D: Choosing a Photogrammetry Workflow for Cultural Heritage Groups. Heritage, 2.10.3390/heritage2030112 ↗
36. Development of an All-Purpose Free Photogrammetric Tool10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B6-31-2016 ↗
37. Image-based 3D modelling: A review10.1111/j.1477-9730.2006.00383.x ↗
38. Architectural and Cultural Heritage conservation using low-cost cameras
39. Reconstruction of 3D models of cast sculptures using close-range photogrammetry
40. Mara, H., and Portl, J. (2013). Acquisition and documentation of vessels using highresolution3D-scanners. Corpus Vasorum Antuorum, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (VÖAW).
41. Photorealistic 3D Digital Reconstructionof a Clay Pitcher10.12913/22998624/113276 ↗
42. Automatic geometry, metrology, and visualisation techniques for 3D scanned vessels
43. Innovative uses of 3D digital technologies toassist the restoration of a fragmented terracotta statue10.1016/j.culher.2012.06.008 ↗
44. Barsanti, S.G., and Guidi, G. (2013, January 2–6). 3D digitization of museum content within the3dicons project. In ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, RemoteSensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Proceedings of the XXIV International CIPA Symposium, Strasbourg, France.
45. Noncontact restoration of missing parts ofstone Buddha statue based on three-dimensional virtual modelingand assembly simulation10.1186/s40494-020-00450-8 ↗
46. A theatricaldouble-faced mask preserved at the museum of lipari (messina): Study and 3d reconstruction through portable equipment10.4995/var.2021.13916 ↗
47. Documenting mackenzie inuit architecture using 3D laser scanning
48. Virtual and interactivemuseum of archaeological artefacts from Afrasiyab—An ancientcity on the silk road
49. Dell’Unto, N., Leander, A.M., Ferdani, D., Dellepiane, M., Callieri, M., and Lindgren, S. (November, January 28). Digital reconstruction and visualization in archaeology. Case-studydrawn from the work of the Swedish Pompeii Project. Proceedings of the DigitalHeritage International Congress, Marseille, France.
50. 3D survey and virtual reconstructionof archeological sites
51. 3D integrated methodologiesfor the documentation and the virtual reconstruction of an archaeologicalsite10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W4-215-2015 ↗
52. Parrinello, S., and Bursich, D. (2017, January 8–10). 3D documentation for the study of the UNESCO site of Masada: Methodologies and applied research for the Analysis of Roman fields. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, CHNT 22, Vienna, Austria.
53. Shining 3D Einscan-Pro, Application and Validation in the Field of Cultural Heritage, from the Chillida-Leku Museum to the Archaeological Museum of Sarno
54. Restitution of Sculptural Groups Using 3D Scanners10.3390/s110908497 ↗
55. Comparative Geometrical Accuracy Investigations of Hand-Held 3D Scanning Systems-an Update10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-487-2018 ↗
56. Bašić, A., Mladineo, M., Peko, I., and Aljinović, A. (2018). 3D Scanning, CAD Optimization and 3D Print Application in Cultural Heritage: An Example on Statue from the Ancient Salona. Mechanical Technologies and Structural Materials, MTSM Conference Proceedings.
57. 3D laser scanners’ techniques overview
58. High-resolution, real-time three-dimensional shape measurement10.1117/1.2402128 ↗
59. An accurate slicing procedure for layered manufacturing
60. Fabrication direction optimization to minimize post-machining in layered manufacturing10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.05.004 ↗
61. Pham, G.N., Lee, S.-H., Kwon, O.-H., and Kwon, K.-R. (2018). A 3D Printing Model Watermarking Algorithm Based on 3D Slicing and Feature Points. Electronics, 7.10.3390/electronics7020023 ↗
62. Hamidi, M., Chetouani, A., El Haziti, M., El Hassouni, M., and Cherifi, H. (2019). Blind Robust 3D Mesh Watermarking Based on Mesh Saliency and Wavelet Transform for Copyright Protection. Information, 10.10.3390/info10020067 ↗
63. Lee, C.H., Varshney, A., and Jacobs, D.W. (August, January 31). Mesh saliency. ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1145/1186822.1073244 ↗
64. Copyright Protections of Digital Content in the Age of 3D Printer: Emerging Issues and Survey10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2864331 ↗
65. Unclonable security features for additive manufacturing
66. Elliott, A.M. (2014). The Effects of Quantum Dot Nanoparticles on Polyjet Direct 3D Printing Process. [Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universit].
67. Digital security: 3D geometry protection of the automatically restituted historical buildings
68. Beugnon, S., Puech, W., and Pedeboy, J.P. (2018, January 23–27). From visual confidentiality to transparent format-compliant selective encryption of 3d objects. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/ICMEW.2018.8551510 ↗
69. (2021, May 11). MeshLab. Available online: https://www.meshlab.net/.
70. (2021, May 11). Cloud Compare. Available online: https://www.danielgm.net/cc/.
71. (2021, May 11). Agisoft Metashape. Available online: https://www.agisoft.com/.
72. (2020, December 28). 3D Scanexpert. Available online: https://3dscanexpert.com/shining-3d-einscan-pro-plus-3d-scanner-review-2/.
73. (2020, December 29). User Manual of Einscan-Pro. Available online: https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/C1HP-UYfCGS.pdf.
74. Polo, M.E., Cuartero, A., and Felicísimo, Á.M. (2019). Study of uncertainty and repeatability in structured-light 3D scanners. arXiv.
75. (2020, December 29). Shining 3D. Available online: https://www.shining3d.com/.
76. Li, Y., Liu, P., Li, H., and Huang, F. (2021). A Comparison Method for 3D Laser Point Clouds in Displacement Change Detection for Arch Dams. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10.10.3390/ijgi10030184 ↗
77. Comparing the performance of point cloud registration methods for landslide monitoring using mobile laser scanning data10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W9-11-2018 ↗
78. Remondino, F., Guarnieri, A., and Vettore, A. (2005). 3D modeling of close-range objects: Photogrammetry or laser scanning. Videometrics VIII Proceedings, International Society for Optics and Photonics.10.1117/12.586294 ↗
79. Heritage documentation using laser scanner and photogrammetry. The case study of Qasr Al-Abidit, Jordan
80. (2021, April 11). Inženjerska Animacija. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iktYWBVdmP4.
81. Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models10.1148/rg.2017160165 ↗
82. Accuracy investigation of 3D printed PLA with various process parameters and different colors10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1246 ↗
83. Influence of 3D printing parameters on the dimensional stability of polypropylene/clay printed parts using laser scanning technique10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.456 ↗
84. Lemu, H.G., and Kurtovic, S. (2011). 3D printing for rapid manufacturing: Study of dimensional and geometrical accuracy. IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-33980-6_51 ↗
85. Chin, S.Y., Dikshit, V., Priyadarshini, B.M., and Zhang, Y. (2020). Powder-Based 3D Printing for the Fabrication of Device with Micro and Mesoscale Features. Micromachines, 11.10.3390/mi11070658 ↗
86. Yuan, J., Tian, J., Chen, C., and Chen, G. (2020). Experimental Investigation of Color Reproduction Quality of Color 3D Printing Based on Colored Layer Features. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25122909 ↗