journal article·2021-07-17Open access

RETRACTED: Accuracy Assessment of Implant Placement in a Newly Developed Dynamic Navigation System: A Pilot Study

Tomoyuki Setoguchi, Yoichiro Ogino, Riichi Ouchida, Akira Takahashi, Yasunori Ayukawa, Kiyoshi Koyano

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 14
This record is marked as retracted by the source. Review the publisher’s notice before using its findings.

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the accuracy of a newly developed dynamic navigation system and to compare the accuracy between flapless and open-flap surgery, and between surgeons. The subjects were patients who were scheduled to receive implants of the same size using the newly developed dynamic navigation system. The study’s procedures included cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) filming with fiducials, virtual planning of implant placement and the use of motion tracking technology for calibration and practical implant placement. The accuracy was evaluated using preoperative (virtual implant) and postoperative (actual implant) CBCT images based on angular, apical, coronal and vertical deviations. The differences of deviations between flapless and open-flap surgery, and between two surgeons, were statistically compared. In total, 66 implants were placed in 39 patients. The median and interquartile range of angular, apical, coronal and vertical deviations were 3.07° (2.52–3.54°), 0.96 mm (0.75–1.42 mm), 0.76 mm (0.57–1.37 mm) and 0.71 mm (0.61–0.88 mm), respectively. These deviations were similar to those found in previous studies. Flapless surgery resulted in a more accurate placement with respect to apical and coronal deviations, and the differences between the two surgeons were limited. The newly developed dynamic navigation system is considered to be eligible for clinical use.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Section of Fixed Prosthodontics, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan

Division of Advanced Dental Devices and Therapeutics, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan

Funding

Sugiyama chemical & industrial laboratory

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022 ↗
2. Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation10.11607/jomi.5004 ↗
3. Accuracy of Implant Placement with a Navigation System, a Laboratory Guide, and Freehand Drilling10.11607/jomi.6585 ↗
4. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review10.1016/j.aanat.2019.04.005 ↗
5. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery10.1016/j.coms.2019.08.001 ↗
6. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial10.1111/clr.13435 ↗
7. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025 ↗
8. Mediavilla Guzmán, A., Riad Deglow, E., Zubizarreta-Macho, Á., Agustín-Panadero, R., and Hernández Montero, S. (2019). Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study. J. Clin. Med., 8.10.3390/jcm8122123 ↗
9. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice10.11607/jomi.6966 ↗
10. Sun, T.M., Lee, H.E., and Lan, T.H. (2020). Comparing Accuracy of Implant Installation with a Navigation System (NS), a Laboratory Guide (LG), NS with LG, and Freehand Drilling. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17062107 ↗
11. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial10.1111/clr.13563 ↗
12. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement10.1186/s40729-020-00272-0 ↗
13. Edelmann, C., Wetzel, M., Knipper, A., Luthardt, R.G., and Schnutenhaus, S. (2021). Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation in Implant Placement with a Fully Digital Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10091808 ↗
14. Fully Guided Versus Half-Guided and Freehand Implant Placement: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis10.11607/jomi.7942 ↗
15. Is Digital Guided Implant Surgery Accurate and Reliable?10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.006 ↗
16. Cristache, C.M., Burlibasa, M., Tudor, I., Totu, E.E., Di Francesco, F., and Moraru, L. (2021). Accuracy, Labor-Time and Patient-Reported Outcomes with Partially versus Fully Digital Workflow for Flapless Guided Dental Implants Insertion-A Randomized Clinical Trial with One-Year Follow-Up. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10051102 ↗
17. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery10.1111/cid.12705 ↗
18. Does flap opening or not influence the accuracy of semi-guided implant placement in partially edentulous sites?10.1111/cid.12847 ↗
19. Influence of bone condition on implant placement accuracy with computer-guided surgery10.1186/s40729-020-00249-z ↗
20. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery10.1111/clr.13520 ↗
21. Sun, T.M., Lee, H.E., and Lan, T.H. (2019). The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system. BMC Oral Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0914-2 ↗
22. Technique for identifying keratinized gingival tissue and soft tissue morphology on 3-dimensional implant-planning software images10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.031 ↗
23. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: A systematic review10.1902/jop.2013.120688 ↗
24. Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies10.11607/jomi.5556 ↗
25. Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/clr.13719 ↗
26. Schnutenhaus, S., Edelmann, C., Knipper, A., and Luthardt, R.G. (2021). Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10040704 ↗
27. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8 ↗
28. Medical navigation system for otologic surgery based on hybrid registration and virtual intraoperative computed tomography10.1109/TBME.2008.2008168 ↗
29. Cochlear implantation assisted by noninvasive image guidance10.1097/MAO.0b013e318268d1e9 ↗
30. A preregistered STAMP method for image-guided temporal bone surgery10.1007/s11548-013-0916-5 ↗
31. Implant Placement Is More Accurate Using Dynamic Navigation10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.026 ↗
32. Exploring training dental implant placement using computer-guided implant navigation system for predoctoral students: A pilot study10.1111/eje.12447 ↗
33. Pellegrino, G., Bellini, P., Cavallini, P.F., Ferri, A., Zacchino, A., Taraschi, V., Marchetti, C., and Consolo, U. (2020). Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology: The Influence of Surgical Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy and Operating Time. An in Vitro Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17062153 ↗