Show source-provided references
3. Pulsatile interaction between the macro-vasculature and micro-vasculature: Proof-of-concept among patients with type 2 diabetes
10.1007/s00421-018-3972-2 ↗5. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves
10.1002/ccd.28039 ↗6. Pledget-Armed Sutures Affect the Haemodynamic Performance of Biologic Aortic Valve Substitutes: A Preliminary Experimental and Computational Study
10.1007/s13239-016-0284-8 ↗10. Truly stentless molded autologous pericardial aortic valve prosthesis with single point attached commissures in a sheep model
10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.044 ↗14. In Vivo Quantification of Helical Blood Flow in Human Aorta by Time-Resolved Three-Dimensional Cine Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10.1007/s10439-008-9609-6 ↗15. Mechanistic insight into the physiological relevance of helical blood flow in the human aorta: An in vivo study
10.1007/s10237-010-0238-2 ↗16. Physiological Significance of Helical Flow in the Arterial System and its Potential Clinical Applications
10.1007/s10439-014-1097-2 ↗17. A rational approach to defining principal axes of multidirectional wall shear stress in realistic vascular geometries, with application to the study of the influence of helical flow on wall shear stress directionality in aorta
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.027 ↗20. Quantification of Hemodynamic Wall Shear Stress in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Phase-Contrast MRI
10.1007/s10439-009-9854-3 ↗21. Assessment of Hemodynamic Conditions in the Aorta Following Root Replacement with Composite Valve-Conduit Graft
10.1007/s10439-015-1453-x ↗22. Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after TAVI compared to surgical aortic valve replacement
10.1007/s10554-015-0792-x ↗23. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with increased wall and turbulence shear stress levels compared to trileaflet aortic valves
10.1007/s10237-014-0623-3 ↗24. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics—Assessment of aortic hemodynamics in a spectrum of aortic valve pathologies
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.040 ↗26. Khalili, F., Gamage, P., Sandler, R., and Mansy, H. (2018). Adverse Hemodynamic Conditions Associated with Mechanical Heart Valve Leaflet Immobility. Bioengineering, 5.
10.3390/bioengineering5030074 ↗30. Patient-Specific Multi-Scale Model Analysis of Hemodynamics Following the Hybrid Norwood Procedure for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Effects of Reverse Blalock–Taussig Shunt Diameter
10.1007/s13239-018-00396-w ↗31. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries
32. Reduction of aberrant aortic haemodynamics following aortic root replacement with a mechanical valved conduit†
10.1093/icvts/ivw173 ↗34. Study of vortex in flow fields induced by surface dielectric barrier discharge actuator at low pressure based on Q criterion
10.1088/2058-6272/aa8e95 ↗37. Flow–Structure Interaction Simulations of the Aortic Heart Valve at Physiologic Conditions: The Role of Tissue Constitutive Model
10.1115/1.4038885 ↗39. Fully-coupled fluid-structure interaction simulation of the aortic and mitral valves in a realistic 3D left ventricle model
10.1371/journal.pone.0184729 ↗40. Dynamic and fluid? structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models
10.1007/s00466-015-1166-x ↗42. On the Modeling of Patient-Specific Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Fluid–Structure Interaction Approach
10.1007/s13239-019-00427-0 ↗46. A coupled fluid-structure finite element model of the aortic valve and root
47. Fluid–structure interaction of an aortic heart valve prosthesis driven by an animated anatomic left ventricle
10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.036 ↗52. Fluid–Structure Interaction Model of a Percutaneous Aortic Valve: Comparison with an In Vitro Test and Feasibility Study in a Patient-Specific Case
10.1007/s10439-015-1429-x ↗53. Fluid–Structure Interaction Models of Bicuspid Aortic Valves: The Effects of Nonfused Cusp Angles
10.1115/1.4038329 ↗54. Kamensky, D.M. (2016). Immersogeometric Fluid—Structure Interaction Analysis of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves. [Doctoral Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin].
55. Fluid–Structure Interaction Study of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Dynamics Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
10.1007/s13239-016-0285-7 ↗56. Fluid structure interaction modeling of aortic valve stenosis at different heart rates
57. Numerical simulation of patient-specific left ventricular model with both mitral and aortic valves by FSI approach
10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.11.009 ↗58. Comparative Fluid–Structure Interaction Analysis of Polymeric Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves’ Hemodynamics and Structural Mechanics
10.1115/1.4040600 ↗63. Chen, H.Y., and Kassab, G.S. (2010). Computational Modeling in Biomechanics, Springer.
64. Fluid–structure interaction, immersed boundary-finite element method simulations of bio-prosthetic heart valves
10.1016/j.cma.2013.01.010 ↗68. De Nisco, G., Zhang, P., Gallo, D., Liu, X., Deng, X., Ponzini, R., Rizzo, G., and Morbiducci, U. (2016, January 20–22). On the Impact of Modeling Assumptions in Subject-Specific Hemodynamic Simulations of Low-Density Lipoproteins Transport in Aorta. Proceedings of the GNB2016, Naples, Italy.
69. Flow in a mechanical bileaflet heart valve at laminar and near-peak systole flow rates: CFD simulations and experiments
10.1115/1.1993665 ↗73. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress
75. Flow patterns and velocity distributions in the human vertebrobasilar arterial system. Laboratory investigation
10.3171/2010.1.JNS09575 ↗76. Chen, L. (2005). Hemodynamics in the Cerebral Circulation: Numerical Studies and Experimetal Investigation. [Doctoral Thesis, Nanyang Technological University].
77. An experimental investigation of the hemodynamic variations due to aplastic vessels within three-dimensional phantom models of the circle of Willis
10.1007/s10439-013-0905-4 ↗80. Inflow boundary conditions for image-based computational hemodynamics: Impact of idealized versus measured velocity profiles in the human aorta
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.10.012 ↗81. Youssefi, P., Gomez, A., Arthurs, C., Sharma, R., Jahangiri, M., and Alberto Figueroa, C. (2018). Impact of Patient-Specific Inflow Velocity Profile on Hemodynamics of the Thoracic Aorta. J. Biomech. Eng., 140.
10.1115/1.4037857 ↗82. On the Use of In Vivo Measured Flow Rates as Boundary Conditions for Image-Based Hemodynamic Models of the Human Aorta: Implications for Indicators of Abnormal Flow
10.1007/s10439-011-0431-1 ↗83. The impact of the aortic valve impairment on the distant coronary arteries hemodynamics: A fluid–structure interaction study
10.1007/s11517-017-1636-8 ↗85. Computational study of aortic hemodynamics for patients with an abnormal aortic valve: The importance of secondary flow at the ascending aorta inlet
10.1063/1.5011960 ↗87. Computational Fluid Dynamics Assessment Associated with Transcatheter Heart Valve Prostheses: A Position Paper of the ISO Working Group
10.1007/s13239-018-0349-y ↗88. Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.056 ↗89. Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping
10.1002/jmri.21082 ↗91. A numerical study on the flow of blood and the transport of LDL in the human aorta: The physiological significance of the helical flow in the aortic arch
10.1152/ajpheart.00266.2009 ↗93. Effect of swirling flow on platelet concentration distribution in small-caliber artificial grafts and end-to-end anastomoses
10.1007/s10409-011-0486-0 ↗94. A new imaging method for assessment of aortic dissection using four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging
10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.005 ↗95. Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping
10.1161/01.CIR.88.5.2235 ↗96. Oechtering, T.H., Sieren, M.M., Hunold, P., Hennemuth, A., Huellebrand, M., Scharfschwerdt, M., Richardt, D., Sievers, H.-H., Barkhausen, J., and Frydrychowicz, A. (2019). Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) reveals altered blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta of patients with valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.127 ↗97. Hemodynamic Evaluation of a Biological and Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis Using Patient-Specific MRI-Based CFD
10.1111/aor.12955 ↗